Effective Public Service Delivery: Governance to "E-Governance in India"

M. Assadi
{"title":"Effective Public Service Delivery: Governance to \"E-Governance in India\"","authors":"M. Assadi","doi":"10.22140/cpar.v3i3/4.67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issues of governance which received much focus during the decade of 1990s, has further expanded with the inclusion of “e-governance”- the latter has enhanced service delivery, enlarged participation and made the democracy more inclusive. India is not an exception to e- governance initiatives which is apparent in the Declaration of year 2001 as “Year of E-Governance”, earmarking two to three percent of plan budget towards e-governance etc. Crisis of governability, catching up with developed world and current trend towards globalization has made India to implement egovernance. There is no uniformity in the application of e-governance in different states or provinces in India. Some states still are in the “preliminary stage” others in “catching up” stage. Only ten states have made serious efforts. Its success rates are not uniform- it varies between partial success to complete failure, including the fact that there are criticisms leveled against it for the reasons that it is “urban biased”, “one way process” and that it would reduce the importance of bureaucracy, politicians. Despite the weakness one should appreciate the fact that it has reduced the cultural and geographical barriers, shifted the paradigm of “space” and helping in completing the project of incomplete modernity. However what is needed to strengthen e-governance is not only by clubbing Cafeteria and Phase model but also the success stories from other countries.","PeriodicalId":445994,"journal":{"name":"The Chinese Public Administration Review","volume":"139 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Chinese Public Administration Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22140/cpar.v3i3/4.67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The issues of governance which received much focus during the decade of 1990s, has further expanded with the inclusion of “e-governance”- the latter has enhanced service delivery, enlarged participation and made the democracy more inclusive. India is not an exception to e- governance initiatives which is apparent in the Declaration of year 2001 as “Year of E-Governance”, earmarking two to three percent of plan budget towards e-governance etc. Crisis of governability, catching up with developed world and current trend towards globalization has made India to implement egovernance. There is no uniformity in the application of e-governance in different states or provinces in India. Some states still are in the “preliminary stage” others in “catching up” stage. Only ten states have made serious efforts. Its success rates are not uniform- it varies between partial success to complete failure, including the fact that there are criticisms leveled against it for the reasons that it is “urban biased”, “one way process” and that it would reduce the importance of bureaucracy, politicians. Despite the weakness one should appreciate the fact that it has reduced the cultural and geographical barriers, shifted the paradigm of “space” and helping in completing the project of incomplete modernity. However what is needed to strengthen e-governance is not only by clubbing Cafeteria and Phase model but also the success stories from other countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有效的公共服务提供:治理到“印度的电子政务”
在90年代备受关注的治理问题,随着“电子政务”的加入而进一步扩大,后者加强了服务的提供,扩大了参与,使民主更具包容性。印度也不是电子政务倡议的例外,这在2001年的“电子政务年”宣言中很明显,指定2%至3%的计划预算用于电子政务等。治理危机、追赶发达国家和当前全球化趋势促使印度实施电子政务。在印度不同的邦或省,电子政务的应用并不统一。一些州仍处于“初步阶段”,另一些州则处于“追赶”阶段。只有10个州做出了认真的努力。它的成功率并不统一——它在部分成功和完全失败之间变化,包括有人批评它的原因是“城市偏见”,“单向过程”,以及它会降低官僚主义和政治家的重要性。尽管存在不足之处,但它减少了文化和地理上的障碍,改变了“空间”的范式,帮助完成了不完整的现代性项目。然而,加强电子政务不仅需要借鉴自助餐厅和阶段模式,还需要借鉴其他国家的成功经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Politics-Administration Dichotomy in Time of Global Crisis: Neutral Competence or Cadre Organizations Book Review: Daniel A. Bell, The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015. Chinese Public Administration as a Resource for the World Book Review: Jinghan Zeng, The Chinese Community Party's Capacity to Rule: Ideology, Legitimacy, and Cohesion. NY: Palgrave Macillan, 2016. Motivation absorbs Magnitude: An Analysis of Health Care Service of KUMBH MELA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1