Returning to Ancestral Soil. A Commentary on IJudOr II 193 (Hierapolis/Phrygia)

Karin Wiedergut
{"title":"Returning to Ancestral Soil. A Commentary on IJudOr II 193 (Hierapolis/Phrygia)","authors":"Karin Wiedergut","doi":"10.54103/1128-8221/19929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The vast and well-preserved necropolis areas in Hierapolis hold several tombs which belonged to members of the local Jewish community. Most of the 27 pertaining epitaphs are perfectly within the scope of local (i.e. pagan) traditions and habits. One text, however, clearly stands out: The sarcophagus inscription of Tatianus and Apphia, Ioudaioi, contains several remarkable features which call for closer consideration. Most of them pertain to the sphere of legal history in the Roman East or, more specifically, to rare peculiarities within the widespread system of tomb protection in Asia Minor: the concession of rights to a sarcophagus from  husband to wife, an oddly phrased prohibition against unwarranted burials, the involvement of both a private individual and a public institution in a tomb’s protection, and a uniquely designed „clause of official recording“. The text’s most striking feature, however, deals with the couple’s transferral into „ancestral soil“ (patrōa gē)—with no further specification given on the stone. The article examines all these highly irregular features one by one in the context of Jewish and pagan epitaphs from Hierapolis and beyond. Special regard is given to the couple’s idea of „ancestral soil“, which, as is shown in detail, may well have been Judaea. The text, thus, may deliver early evidence for the wish of Diaspora Jews to be transferred there after death.","PeriodicalId":259453,"journal":{"name":"Dike - Rivista di Storia del Diritto Greco ed Ellenistico","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dike - Rivista di Storia del Diritto Greco ed Ellenistico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54103/1128-8221/19929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The vast and well-preserved necropolis areas in Hierapolis hold several tombs which belonged to members of the local Jewish community. Most of the 27 pertaining epitaphs are perfectly within the scope of local (i.e. pagan) traditions and habits. One text, however, clearly stands out: The sarcophagus inscription of Tatianus and Apphia, Ioudaioi, contains several remarkable features which call for closer consideration. Most of them pertain to the sphere of legal history in the Roman East or, more specifically, to rare peculiarities within the widespread system of tomb protection in Asia Minor: the concession of rights to a sarcophagus from  husband to wife, an oddly phrased prohibition against unwarranted burials, the involvement of both a private individual and a public institution in a tomb’s protection, and a uniquely designed „clause of official recording“. The text’s most striking feature, however, deals with the couple’s transferral into „ancestral soil“ (patrōa gē)—with no further specification given on the stone. The article examines all these highly irregular features one by one in the context of Jewish and pagan epitaphs from Hierapolis and beyond. Special regard is given to the couple’s idea of „ancestral soil“, which, as is shown in detail, may well have been Judaea. The text, thus, may deliver early evidence for the wish of Diaspora Jews to be transferred there after death.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回归故土。《犹大书》评注193(希拉波利斯/弗里吉亚)
希拉波利斯保存完好的大墓地地区有几座属于当地犹太社区成员的坟墓。27个墓志铭中的大多数都完全符合当地(即异教徒)的传统和习惯。然而,有一段文字非常引人注目:爱荷华州塔提亚努斯和阿菲亚的石棺铭文包含了几个值得进一步研究的显著特征。其中大多数都与罗马东部的法律史有关,或者更具体地说,与小亚细亚普遍存在的墓葬保护制度中的罕见特点有关:石棺的权利从丈夫到妻子的特许,对未经许可的埋葬的奇怪措辞禁止,私人和公共机构都参与墓葬的保护,以及设计独特的“官方记录条款”。然而,碑文最引人注目的特点是关于这对夫妇转移到“祖先的土地”(patrōa g´)的问题,碑文上没有给出进一步的说明。文章检查了所有这些高度不规则的特点一个接一个在犹太和异教徒墓志铭的背景下,从希拉波利斯和超越。特别注意到这对夫妇的“祖先的土地”的想法,如详细所示,很可能是犹太。因此,该文本可能提供了散居犹太人在死后被转移到那里的愿望的早期证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Greek-philosophical impact on Labeo’s definition of the locatio conductio operis Περὶ τῶν συμβολῶν. La question de l’isopoliteia chez Philippe Gauthier Atene, gli alleati e l’impero: symbolai e symbola tra V e IV secolo a.C. 1972-2022 : conception, réception et portée des Symbola de Philippe Gauthier International Symposium „Ancient Greek Law – Vectors of Local Idiosyncrasy and Unity“ – Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, 23.-24. Februar 2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1