Performance Comparison and Energy Consumption Index Between MPC and FuzzyPID in Small-scaled Agarwood Distillation Pot

Nurul Nadia Mohammad, A. A. Azman, Mohd Hezri Marzaki, R. Adnan, M. Tajjudin, Mohd Hezri Fazalul Rahiman, S. N. Tajuddin
{"title":"Performance Comparison and Energy Consumption Index Between MPC and FuzzyPID in Small-scaled Agarwood Distillation Pot","authors":"Nurul Nadia Mohammad, A. A. Azman, Mohd Hezri Marzaki, R. Adnan, M. Tajjudin, Mohd Hezri Fazalul Rahiman, S. N. Tajuddin","doi":"10.1109/ICSGRC.2018.8657575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper highlights a performance comparison and evaluation on energy consumption between Model Predictive Controller (MPC) and self-tuning FuzzyPID. First-Order-Plus-Dead-Time (FOPDT) is developed to model a hydro distillation process behaviour. In this study, the approaches of control strategy is intended to optimise the energy consumption as well as to improve the performance on transient response. Therefore, the best controller will be identified for this hydro distillation system. The analyses result on performance of the transient response and energy consumption are been performed. It was found that, MPC was capable to eliminate overshoot, achieved faster response in settling time and consumed lower energy usage than FuzzyPID.","PeriodicalId":147027,"journal":{"name":"2018 9th IEEE Control and System Graduate Research Colloquium (ICSGRC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 9th IEEE Control and System Graduate Research Colloquium (ICSGRC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSGRC.2018.8657575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This paper highlights a performance comparison and evaluation on energy consumption between Model Predictive Controller (MPC) and self-tuning FuzzyPID. First-Order-Plus-Dead-Time (FOPDT) is developed to model a hydro distillation process behaviour. In this study, the approaches of control strategy is intended to optimise the energy consumption as well as to improve the performance on transient response. Therefore, the best controller will be identified for this hydro distillation system. The analyses result on performance of the transient response and energy consumption are been performed. It was found that, MPC was capable to eliminate overshoot, achieved faster response in settling time and consumed lower energy usage than FuzzyPID.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MPC与模糊pid在小型沉香蒸馏釜中的性能比较及能耗指标
本文着重对模型预测控制器(MPC)和自整定模糊pid的能耗进行了性能比较和评价。一阶加死时间(FOPDT)模型用于模拟水蒸馏过程的行为。在本研究中,控制策略的方法旨在优化能量消耗以及提高瞬态响应的性能。因此,将为该水力蒸馏系统确定最佳控制器。给出了系统的瞬态响应性能和能耗分析结果。结果表明,MPC比FuzzyPID能够消除超调,在稳定时间内获得更快的响应,并且能耗更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Data Store-and-Delivery Approach for Air-Ground Collaborative Wireless Sensor Network Statistical Analysis of Agarwood Oil Compounds based on GC-MS Data Radial Basis Function (RBF) tuned Kernel Parameter of Agarwood Oil Compound for Quality Classification using Support Vector Machine (SVM) Improved Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm for Overcurrent Relays Coordination Optimal Direct Yaw Control for Sport Utility Vehicle Using PSO
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1