ON EDGINGTON’S FORMALIZATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF KNOWABILITY

E. Borisov
{"title":"ON EDGINGTON’S FORMALIZATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF KNOWABILITY","authors":"E. Borisov","doi":"10.47850/rl.2021.2.4.43-51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The formalization of the principle of knowability suggested by Dorothy Edgington is examined. This formalization has been suggested as a solution to the Fitch problem. It is interesting in that it blocks the Fitch argument and, in informal reading, makes a clear and intuitively appealing sense. On the other hand, as is shown in the paper, the semantic theory behind this formalization has two significant gaps: 1) it does not define the interpretation of actuality operator, and 2) it does not define the semantic way of representing the agent’s knowledge. The main outcome of the papers is critical. It is to the effect that unless those gaps are filled, Edgington’s theory cannot count as a solution to the Fitch problem.","PeriodicalId":370810,"journal":{"name":"Respublica literaria","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respublica literaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47850/rl.2021.2.4.43-51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The formalization of the principle of knowability suggested by Dorothy Edgington is examined. This formalization has been suggested as a solution to the Fitch problem. It is interesting in that it blocks the Fitch argument and, in informal reading, makes a clear and intuitively appealing sense. On the other hand, as is shown in the paper, the semantic theory behind this formalization has two significant gaps: 1) it does not define the interpretation of actuality operator, and 2) it does not define the semantic way of representing the agent’s knowledge. The main outcome of the papers is critical. It is to the effect that unless those gaps are filled, Edgington’s theory cannot count as a solution to the Fitch problem.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论爱丁顿对可知性原则的形式化
本文考察了多萝西·爱丁顿提出的可知性原则的形式化。这种形式化被认为是解决惠誉问题的一种方法。有趣的是,它阻碍了惠誉的论点,在非正式的阅读中,它有一种清晰而直观的吸引力。另一方面,正如本文所示,这种形式化背后的语义理论有两个显著的缺陷:1)它没有定义对现实操作符的解释,2)它没有定义表示代理知识的语义方式。这些论文的主要成果是至关重要的。其大意是,除非这些空白被填补,否则爱丁顿的理论不能算作解决惠誉问题的办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Classical philosophy in Novosibirsk Scientific Center. The pages of history The Philosophical Studies in Antiquity: Chapter of History THE CONCEPT OF UTILITY IN CHARLES SANDERS PEIRCE'S PRAGMATISM IN A LABYRINTH OF CONTEXTS. Book Review: Philosophy and Its History. Discussions: Textbook / editor, introduction, translation and comments by M. N. Volf. Novosibirsk, 2021. 239 p. COMPARATIVE CONCEPTOLOGY OF POWER AND RESISTANCE USING GOOGLE NGRAM BOOKS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1