Facebook and privacy: it's complicated

Maritza L. Johnson, Serge Egelman, S. Bellovin
{"title":"Facebook and privacy: it's complicated","authors":"Maritza L. Johnson, Serge Egelman, S. Bellovin","doi":"10.1145/2335356.2335369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We measure users' attitudes toward interpersonal privacy concerns on Facebook and measure users' strategies for reconciling their concerns with their desire to share content online. To do this, we recruited 260 Facebook users to install a Facebook application that surveyed their privacy concerns, their friend network compositions, the sensitivity of posted content, and their privacy-preserving strategies. By asking participants targeted questions about people randomly selected from their friend network and posts shared on their profiles, we were able to quantify the extent to which users trust their \"friends\" and the likelihood that their content was being viewed by unintended audiences. We found that while strangers are the most concerning audience, almost 95% of our participants had taken steps to mitigate those concerns. At the same time, we observed that 16.5% of participants had at least one post that they were uncomfortable sharing with a specific friend---someone who likely already had the ability to view it---and that 37% raised more general concerns with sharing their content with friends. We conclude that the current privacy controls allow users to effectively manage the outsider threat, but that they are unsuitable for mitigating concerns over the insider threat---members of the friend network who dynamically become inappropriate audiences based on the context of a post.","PeriodicalId":273244,"journal":{"name":"Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"224","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2335356.2335369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 224

Abstract

We measure users' attitudes toward interpersonal privacy concerns on Facebook and measure users' strategies for reconciling their concerns with their desire to share content online. To do this, we recruited 260 Facebook users to install a Facebook application that surveyed their privacy concerns, their friend network compositions, the sensitivity of posted content, and their privacy-preserving strategies. By asking participants targeted questions about people randomly selected from their friend network and posts shared on their profiles, we were able to quantify the extent to which users trust their "friends" and the likelihood that their content was being viewed by unintended audiences. We found that while strangers are the most concerning audience, almost 95% of our participants had taken steps to mitigate those concerns. At the same time, we observed that 16.5% of participants had at least one post that they were uncomfortable sharing with a specific friend---someone who likely already had the ability to view it---and that 37% raised more general concerns with sharing their content with friends. We conclude that the current privacy controls allow users to effectively manage the outsider threat, but that they are unsuitable for mitigating concerns over the insider threat---members of the friend network who dynamically become inappropriate audiences based on the context of a post.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Facebook和隐私:这很复杂
我们测量了用户对Facebook上人际隐私问题的态度,并测量了用户协调他们的担忧与他们在线分享内容的愿望的策略。为此,我们招募了260名Facebook用户来安装一个Facebook应用程序,该应用程序调查了他们对隐私的担忧、他们的朋友网络构成、发布内容的敏感性以及他们的隐私保护策略。通过向参与者询问有关从他们的朋友网络中随机选择的人以及他们个人资料上分享的帖子的针对性问题,我们能够量化用户对他们“朋友”的信任程度,以及他们的内容被意外受众浏览的可能性。我们发现,虽然陌生人是最令人担忧的听众,但几乎95%的参与者都采取了措施来减轻这些担忧。与此同时,我们观察到,16.5%的参与者至少有一个帖子让他们不愿意与某个特定的朋友分享——这个朋友可能已经有能力查看它——37%的人对与朋友分享他们的内容表示更普遍的担忧。我们得出的结论是,当前的隐私控制允许用户有效地管理外部威胁,但它们不适合减轻对内部威胁的担忧——朋友网络的成员会根据帖子的上下文动态地成为不合适的受众。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"Is Reporting Worth the Sacrifice of Revealing What I Have Sent?": Privacy Considerations When Reporting on End-to-End Encrypted Platforms Iterative Design of An Accessible Crypto Wallet for Blind Users Fight Fire with Fire: Hacktivists' Take on Social Media Misinformation A Design Space for Effective Privacy Notices On the Memorability of System-generated PINs: Can Chunking Help?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1