Efficiency and subsidies: mapping and multidisciplinary analysis

Silvia Ferreira Marques Salustiano, Natália Barbosa
{"title":"Efficiency and subsidies: mapping and multidisciplinary analysis","authors":"Silvia Ferreira Marques Salustiano, Natália Barbosa","doi":"10.1504/IJBBM.2019.10018876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to assess the roots, the evolution and the influence of literature on subsidies and efficiency in a variety of areas of knowledge such economics, management, business, agricultural policy and environmental sciences. By analysing 1,507 articles authored by 3,410 scientists and with 47,028 cited references and by using co-word analysis tools, different themes dealt with the relationship between subsidies and efficiency were disclosed and examined. The results have shown that efficiency and energy are the two themes that stand out, while subsidies are a secondary theme with a strong connection with efficiency research. Evidence shows that the literature on subsidies and efficiency embodies a relatively new field, which has remarkably consolidated over the last ten years as a research area. However, the roots of this literature are found in articles published between 1971 and 1998. At that time, the theoretical studies, mainly in the area of economics, have defined the main econometric models currently used in several areas of knowledge, including the measurement of subsidies effects on efficiency.","PeriodicalId":415997,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Bibliometrics in Business and Management","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Bibliometrics in Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBBM.2019.10018876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to assess the roots, the evolution and the influence of literature on subsidies and efficiency in a variety of areas of knowledge such economics, management, business, agricultural policy and environmental sciences. By analysing 1,507 articles authored by 3,410 scientists and with 47,028 cited references and by using co-word analysis tools, different themes dealt with the relationship between subsidies and efficiency were disclosed and examined. The results have shown that efficiency and energy are the two themes that stand out, while subsidies are a secondary theme with a strong connection with efficiency research. Evidence shows that the literature on subsidies and efficiency embodies a relatively new field, which has remarkably consolidated over the last ten years as a research area. However, the roots of this literature are found in articles published between 1971 and 1998. At that time, the theoretical studies, mainly in the area of economics, have defined the main econometric models currently used in several areas of knowledge, including the measurement of subsidies effects on efficiency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
效率和补贴:绘图和多学科分析
本研究旨在评估各种知识领域(如经济学、管理学、商业、农业政策和环境科学)的文献对补贴和效率的根源、演变和影响。通过分析3,410名科学家撰写的1,507篇文章,引用了47,028篇参考文献,并使用共词分析工具,揭示和检查了涉及补贴与效率之间关系的不同主题。结果表明,效率和能源是两个突出的主题,而补贴是与效率研究密切相关的次要主题。有证据表明,关于补贴和效率的文献体现了一个相对较新的领域,这一领域在过去十年中作为一个研究领域得到了显著巩固。然而,这些文献的根源可以在1971年至1998年之间发表的文章中找到。当时,主要在经济学领域的理论研究已经定义了目前在几个知识领域使用的主要计量经济学模型,包括补贴对效率影响的测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficiency and subsidies: mapping and multidisciplinary analysis Employee voice and silence: a bibliometric analysis of the literature Research trends on food safety and sanitation in hospitality and tourism Cross-border mergers and acquisitions: a bibliometric review and future research avenues Contributions of the balanced scorecard as a support instrument in strategic decision-making: A bibliometric study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1