University Administrative Employees’ Perceptions of Their Offices’ Physical Environment Comfort

S. Ngcobo, J. Mhlanga
{"title":"University Administrative Employees’ Perceptions of Their Offices’ Physical Environment Comfort","authors":"S. Ngcobo, J. Mhlanga","doi":"10.21272/bel.6(4).61-78.2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Administrative office employees spend much time confined in their workspaces as they work hard to provide the critical support required for the overall performance of their organizations. As a result, their comfort should be given priority by their organizations, be it private or public. This article investigated the administrative employees’ perceptions of their offices’ physical environment comfort in a public university. Different aspects of their physical environment, such as furniture, noise, office temperature, lighting and space, were examined as variables influencing their performance. The systematization of literary sources for solving the problem of arranging a comfortable physical environment in private organizations proved a significant dependence of the productivity of employees on the physical environment in which they perform their duties. However, there is the scarcity of research conducted in a public organization, especially in the higher education sector. The methodological tool of the research was the method of quantitative analysis, in which a questionnaire was used to collect data from 81 administrative staff of a public university with several campuses in South Africa. The findings indicated that many respondents generally perceived a comfortable physical environment necessary to increase performance. These were, however, not always matched by their perceptions of what transpired at their offices. For instance, 63% of respondents viewed comfortable furniture as critical for the performance of their duties. Nevertheless, only 55% of respondents agreed that their university furniture was comfortable, with 24% disagreeing and 21% taking a neutral stance. The split in perceptions makes it imperative for the university to attend to areas of weakness and inequality in providing physical environment resources. A future study could examine whose offices are more comfortable than others in university contexts. In addition, a promising direction of future research should be the reconciliation of employees’ perception of the comfort of the physical environment in offices with the results of observations. This will enrich the obtained results.","PeriodicalId":410560,"journal":{"name":"Business Ethics and Leadership","volume":"353 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Ethics and Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.6(4).61-78.2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Administrative office employees spend much time confined in their workspaces as they work hard to provide the critical support required for the overall performance of their organizations. As a result, their comfort should be given priority by their organizations, be it private or public. This article investigated the administrative employees’ perceptions of their offices’ physical environment comfort in a public university. Different aspects of their physical environment, such as furniture, noise, office temperature, lighting and space, were examined as variables influencing their performance. The systematization of literary sources for solving the problem of arranging a comfortable physical environment in private organizations proved a significant dependence of the productivity of employees on the physical environment in which they perform their duties. However, there is the scarcity of research conducted in a public organization, especially in the higher education sector. The methodological tool of the research was the method of quantitative analysis, in which a questionnaire was used to collect data from 81 administrative staff of a public university with several campuses in South Africa. The findings indicated that many respondents generally perceived a comfortable physical environment necessary to increase performance. These were, however, not always matched by their perceptions of what transpired at their offices. For instance, 63% of respondents viewed comfortable furniture as critical for the performance of their duties. Nevertheless, only 55% of respondents agreed that their university furniture was comfortable, with 24% disagreeing and 21% taking a neutral stance. The split in perceptions makes it imperative for the university to attend to areas of weakness and inequality in providing physical environment resources. A future study could examine whose offices are more comfortable than others in university contexts. In addition, a promising direction of future research should be the reconciliation of employees’ perception of the comfort of the physical environment in offices with the results of observations. This will enrich the obtained results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学行政人员对办公室物理环境舒适度的感知
行政办公室员工花费大量时间在自己的工作空间,因为他们努力工作,为组织的整体绩效提供所需的关键支持。因此,无论是私人还是公共机构,都应该优先考虑他们的舒适。本文调查了一所公立大学行政人员对办公室物理环境舒适度的感知。他们物理环境的不同方面,如家具、噪音、办公室温度、照明和空间,作为影响他们表现的变量进行了研究。为解决在私人组织中安排舒适的物理环境的问题而将文学来源系统化,证明了员工的生产力对他们履行职责的物理环境的重大依赖。然而,在公共组织中进行的研究却很稀缺,尤其是在高等教育部门。本研究的方法论工具为定量分析方法,采用问卷调查的方法,对南非一所公立大学的81名行政人员进行数据收集。调查结果表明,许多受访者普遍认为舒适的物理环境是提高绩效所必需的。然而,这些并不总是与他们对办公室里发生的事情的看法相匹配。例如,63%的受访者认为舒适的家具对他们履行职责至关重要。然而,只有55%的受访者认为他们的大学家具舒适,24%的人不同意,21%的人持中立态度。观念上的分歧使得大学在提供自然环境资源方面必须关注薄弱和不平等的领域。未来的一项研究可能会调查在大学环境中,哪些办公室比其他办公室更舒适。此外,未来研究的一个有希望的方向应该是调和员工对办公室物理环境舒适度的感知与观察结果。这将丰富已取得的成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
To Overcome Ethical Dilemmas in an Organization: Paradox and Ethics of Freedom Can Help A Fair Investment Environment: The Impact of the Shadow Economy, the Harshness of the Courts Against Corrupt Officials, Tax Pressure and Restrictions on Business Cost of Quality Management: Encouraging Business Leaders to Manage and Invest in Quality Enhancement Exploring Leadership and Other Influential Dimensions When Assessing Online Learning Modules Within Higher Education Institutions: Insights From Flow Theory and Two-Factor Principles Corruption and Economic Growth Nexus: Empirical Evidence From Dynamic Threshold Panel Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1