Non-humanitarian Futures?

Ilana Feldman
{"title":"Non-humanitarian Futures?","authors":"Ilana Feldman","doi":"10.1525/CALIFORNIA/9780520299627.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter looks at how, in different moments, facing different challenges, Palestinians have engaged and worked toward non-humanitarian futures. These engagements are another dimension of the politics of living in humanitarianism. And like all such politics, they both make creative use of humanitarian tools and encounter the limits of this framework. The chapter focuses on two instances. The first is the revolutionary humanitarianism of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), specifically the Palestine Red Crescent Society and Samed, the Palestine Martyr’s Society, which focused on development. These institutions argued that humanitarianism could support national politics. The second is an experimental project called Campus in Camps in Dheisheh camp. Campus in Camps works at the intersection of aspiration and refusal, trying to reinvigorate the camp as a site of political invention.","PeriodicalId":422310,"journal":{"name":"Life Lived in Relief","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life Lived in Relief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/CALIFORNIA/9780520299627.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter looks at how, in different moments, facing different challenges, Palestinians have engaged and worked toward non-humanitarian futures. These engagements are another dimension of the politics of living in humanitarianism. And like all such politics, they both make creative use of humanitarian tools and encounter the limits of this framework. The chapter focuses on two instances. The first is the revolutionary humanitarianism of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), specifically the Palestine Red Crescent Society and Samed, the Palestine Martyr’s Society, which focused on development. These institutions argued that humanitarianism could support national politics. The second is an experimental project called Campus in Camps in Dheisheh camp. Campus in Camps works at the intersection of aspiration and refusal, trying to reinvigorate the camp as a site of political invention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非人道主义期货?
本章着眼于巴勒斯坦人如何在不同的时刻,面对不同的挑战,参与并努力走向非人道主义的未来。这些接触是生活在人道主义中的政治的另一个方面。像所有这样的政治一样,他们都创造性地使用了人道主义工具,并遇到了这个框架的限制。本章着重于两个实例。第一个是巴勒斯坦解放组织(巴解组织),特别是巴勒斯坦红新月会和巴勒斯坦烈士会的革命人道主义,其重点是发展。这些机构认为人道主义可以支持国家政治。第二个是在Dheisheh难民营的一个名为校园的实验项目。“营地校园”在渴望和拒绝的交汇处工作,试图使营地重新焕发活力,成为政治发明的场所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chapter 5. The Politics of Living as a Refugee Acknowledgments List of Illustrations Frontmatter Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1