‘Good Impression’ as a Moderator in Employment‐Related Assessment

R. Lanyon, L. D. Goodstein, Rebecca E. Wershba
{"title":"‘Good Impression’ as a Moderator in Employment‐Related Assessment","authors":"R. Lanyon, L. D. Goodstein, Rebecca E. Wershba","doi":"10.1111/ijsa.12056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is widespread agreement that response bias variables, such as good impression, have little relevance, either as moderators or suppressors, in efforts to improve the accuracy of employment-related predictions based on personality test scores. However, a recent review found that there were relatively few methodologically sound real-life studies of the moderator function. Reported here are four such studies involving the prediction of job performance. As hypothesized, a significant moderator effect was shown in the two studies that utilized ‘transparent’ job-related predictors, with useful prediction only at the lower levels of good impression, but not in the two studies that utilized personality variables as predictors. These results confirm that validity when using transparent items to predict employment-related success can be affected by the operation of good-impression response bias. Further research is needed to delineate other relevant effects of good impression in such situations.","PeriodicalId":259932,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: International Journal of Selection & Assessment","volume":"22 8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: International Journal of Selection & Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

There is widespread agreement that response bias variables, such as good impression, have little relevance, either as moderators or suppressors, in efforts to improve the accuracy of employment-related predictions based on personality test scores. However, a recent review found that there were relatively few methodologically sound real-life studies of the moderator function. Reported here are four such studies involving the prediction of job performance. As hypothesized, a significant moderator effect was shown in the two studies that utilized ‘transparent’ job-related predictors, with useful prediction only at the lower levels of good impression, but not in the two studies that utilized personality variables as predictors. These results confirm that validity when using transparent items to predict employment-related success can be affected by the operation of good-impression response bias. Further research is needed to delineate other relevant effects of good impression in such situations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“好印象”在就业相关评估中的调节作用
人们普遍认为,无论是作为调节因素还是抑制因素,反应偏差变量(如好印象)在提高基于人格测试分数的就业相关预测的准确性方面都没有什么相关性。然而,最近的一项审查发现,在方法上合理的现实生活中对调节功能的研究相对较少。这里报告了四个涉及工作表现预测的研究。正如假设的那样,在两项使用“透明”工作相关预测因子的研究中显示了显著的调节效应,只有在较低水平的良好印象中才有有用的预测,但在两项使用人格变量作为预测因子的研究中则没有。这些结果证实,当使用透明项目预测就业相关成功时,效度会受到良好印象反应偏差的影响。在这种情况下,需要进一步的研究来描述良好印象的其他相关影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dual Relational Model of Perceived Overqualification: Employee's Self‐Concept and Task Performance Does Interview Anxiety Predict Job Performance and Does it Influence the Predictive Validity of Interviews? Affective Responses to Abuse in the Workplace: The Role of Hope and Affective Commitment Generalization of Cognitive and Noncognitive Validities Across Personality‐Based Job Families Video�?Based Testing: A High�?Fidelity Job Simulation that Demonstrates Reliability, Validity, and Utility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1