Application of Compensation Money Legal Sanctions in Corruption Crimes in Indonesia and the United States

R. D. Widijowati
{"title":"Application of Compensation Money Legal Sanctions in Corruption Crimes in Indonesia and the United States","authors":"R. D. Widijowati","doi":"10.54783/influencejournal.v5i2.150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the issuance of TAP MPR Number IX/MPR/1998 concerning State Administration that is Clean and Free from Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism, the People's Representative Council of the Republic of Indonesia (DPR RI) then issued a series of laws against corruption, including: Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes; and Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes. Apart from that, the government is also making efforts through determining the payment of money as compensation for corruption. The problem is how is the legal comparison between Indonesia and the United States regarding criminal sanctions for money as compensation in the concept of law enforcement on corruption crimes? The research used is normative legal research, namely a scientific research procedure to find the truth based on the scientific logic of law from a normative side, studying the application of rules or norms in positive law to find legal rules, legal principles, and doctrines, generate arguments, theories, or new concepts to find solutions to legal issues that arise and answer problems. The results of the study show that there are differences between Indonesia and the United States regarding criminal sanctions for money substitutes in the concept of law enforcement for criminal acts of corruption.","PeriodicalId":164494,"journal":{"name":"INFLUENCE: International Journal of Science Review","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INFLUENCE: International Journal of Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54783/influencejournal.v5i2.150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After the issuance of TAP MPR Number IX/MPR/1998 concerning State Administration that is Clean and Free from Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism, the People's Representative Council of the Republic of Indonesia (DPR RI) then issued a series of laws against corruption, including: Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes; and Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes. Apart from that, the government is also making efforts through determining the payment of money as compensation for corruption. The problem is how is the legal comparison between Indonesia and the United States regarding criminal sanctions for money as compensation in the concept of law enforcement on corruption crimes? The research used is normative legal research, namely a scientific research procedure to find the truth based on the scientific logic of law from a normative side, studying the application of rules or norms in positive law to find legal rules, legal principles, and doctrines, generate arguments, theories, or new concepts to find solutions to legal issues that arise and answer problems. The results of the study show that there are differences between Indonesia and the United States regarding criminal sanctions for money substitutes in the concept of law enforcement for criminal acts of corruption.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
赔款法律制裁在印尼和美国腐败犯罪中的适用
印度尼西亚共和国人民代表委员会(DPR RI)在颁布了关于国家行政机构廉洁、无腐败、无勾结、无裙带关系的第IX/MPR/1998号TAP MPR之后,又颁布了一系列反腐败法律,包括:1999年关于消除腐败犯罪的第31号法律;2001年第20号法律,关于修改1999年第31号法律,关于铲除腐败犯罪。除此之外,政府还在努力确定是否支付腐败赔偿。问题是印尼和美国在腐败犯罪执法概念中,对以金钱作为赔偿的刑事制裁的法律比较如何?所使用的研究是规范法学研究,即从规范的角度出发,以法律的科学逻辑为基础,寻找真理的科学研究程序,研究成文法中规则或规范的运用,寻找法律规则、法理、学说,产生论证、理论或新概念,为出现的法律问题寻找解决方案,回答问题。研究结果表明,印度尼西亚和美国在对腐败犯罪行为的执法概念上对货币替代品的刑事制裁存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Influence of Motivation on the Achievement Index of Early Level Dental Health Vocational Program Students During the Pandemic The Strategic Role of Archives in Public Services in the Licensing Sector Sedekah Bumi (Earth Charity) as a Means of Social Interaction Amongst Religious Communities in Kalimangli Subvillage, Karang Tengah Village, Tuntang District Creating Green Circular Economy in Waste Management: The Kampung Hijau Bank Sampah Al-Haqiqi Case Unveiling Gender Dynamics: An In-depth Analysis of Gender Realities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1