An Analysis of the Financial Health of Companies Concerning the Business Environment of the V4 Countries

Marek Nagy, K. Valaskova
{"title":"An Analysis of the Financial Health of Companies Concerning the Business Environment of the V4 Countries","authors":"Marek Nagy, K. Valaskova","doi":"10.2478/foli-2023-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Research background The business environment is an integral part of all business activity. Every business operates in a certain atmosphere that is dynamic and has a constant impact on the business. Therefore, it is important to analyse and predict the development of the business environment. Purpose The aim of this paper is to specify the financial health of a group of companies determined by selected indicators with the business environment of the V4 countries, to interpret the obtained results and, based on them, to propose a complex of systemic measures for business practice. Research methodology The business environment is evaluated within two decision-making processes, in which the optimal environment is selected based on selected criteria (e.g., GDP, unemployment, inflation). To solve decision-making processes, two methods are used – the Saaty’s matrix method and the TOPSIS method. The business environment is also evaluated based on the ratio indicators of the financial analysis of companies in the V4 group. Results Applying the TOPSIS method, it was found that Hungary’s business environment is considered the most suitable for entrepreneurs. From the point of view of financial analysis indicators, it was found that companies in Poland were ranked best. Second place was occupied by Czech companies, followed by Hungarian companies. Companies in the Slovak Republic were ranked worst. Novelty The subjectivity of choosing the criterion weights and the lack of data might both be seen as research limitations. The difficulty lies in conducting a more in-depth study that may also be applied to a wider region. The added value of the work can be considered a mutual comparison of the decision-making processes within the V4 group and a kind of advice for entrepreneurs, where one can do business with the best prospects for the future.","PeriodicalId":314664,"journal":{"name":"Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/foli-2023-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Research background The business environment is an integral part of all business activity. Every business operates in a certain atmosphere that is dynamic and has a constant impact on the business. Therefore, it is important to analyse and predict the development of the business environment. Purpose The aim of this paper is to specify the financial health of a group of companies determined by selected indicators with the business environment of the V4 countries, to interpret the obtained results and, based on them, to propose a complex of systemic measures for business practice. Research methodology The business environment is evaluated within two decision-making processes, in which the optimal environment is selected based on selected criteria (e.g., GDP, unemployment, inflation). To solve decision-making processes, two methods are used – the Saaty’s matrix method and the TOPSIS method. The business environment is also evaluated based on the ratio indicators of the financial analysis of companies in the V4 group. Results Applying the TOPSIS method, it was found that Hungary’s business environment is considered the most suitable for entrepreneurs. From the point of view of financial analysis indicators, it was found that companies in Poland were ranked best. Second place was occupied by Czech companies, followed by Hungarian companies. Companies in the Slovak Republic were ranked worst. Novelty The subjectivity of choosing the criterion weights and the lack of data might both be seen as research limitations. The difficulty lies in conducting a more in-depth study that may also be applied to a wider region. The added value of the work can be considered a mutual comparison of the decision-making processes within the V4 group and a kind of advice for entrepreneurs, where one can do business with the best prospects for the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于营商环境的V4国家企业财务健康状况分析
商业环境是所有商业活动中不可或缺的一部分。每一项业务都是在一个动态的、对业务有持续影响的特定环境中运作的。因此,分析和预测商业环境的发展是很重要的。本文的目的是通过选定的指标来确定一组公司的财务健康状况与V4国家的商业环境,并对所获得的结果进行解释,并在此基础上提出一套系统的商业实践措施。研究方法商业环境在两个决策过程中进行评估,其中根据选定的标准(例如,GDP,失业率,通货膨胀)选择最佳环境。为了求解决策过程,采用了两种方法——Saaty矩阵法和TOPSIS法。以V4集团企业的财务分析比率指标为基础,评价了经营环境。结果运用TOPSIS方法,匈牙利的营商环境被认为是最适合创业的。从财务分析指标来看,波兰的公司排名最好。排名第二的是捷克公司,其次是匈牙利公司。斯洛伐克共和国的公司排名最差。标准权重选择的主观性和数据的缺乏都可能被视为研究的局限性。困难在于进行更深入的研究,这种研究也可能适用于更广泛的区域。这项工作的附加值可以被认为是V4小组内部决策过程的相互比较,也是对企业家的一种建议,在那里人们可以以最好的前景开展业务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Land Resources and Agricultural Exports Nexus Conflict of interests among shareholders – does it refer to dividend decisions? An Attempt to Measure and Model Women’s Attitudes to Saving for Retirement Reliability of Renewable Power Generation using the Example of Offshore Wind Farms Balance of Payments as a Monetary Phenomenon: An ARDL Bounds Test Method for Algeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1