Filozofia arabska, islamska czy muzułmańska? Kilka uwag terminologicznych

Damian Kokoć
{"title":"Filozofia arabska, islamska czy muzułmańska? Kilka uwag terminologicznych","authors":"Damian Kokoć","doi":"10.14746/h.2021.2.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is no agreement among the students of the works of Al-Fārābī, Avicenna and Averroes on how their philosophy should be named. The following terms are most frequently used: Muslim philosophy, Arab philosophy, and Islamic philosophy. A closer look at the arguments of the supporters of each of these choices shows that the reason for those terminological discrepancies depends on the postulated relation between religion and philosophy, or more broadly, between religion and science. We emphasize either the ethnic aspect (Arab) or the dominant culture-forming factor (Islam) depending on the terminology chosen. This article aims to present and analyze the arguments of the supporters of each of the terms. The author focuses on philosophers living in the Middle Ages. The question of which of the aforementioned terms best represents the phenomenon in focus will be seen when we study those terms by putting them together in two pairs: the first, Arab philosophy – Muslim philosophy, and the second, Muslim philosophy – Islamic philosophy.","PeriodicalId":312956,"journal":{"name":"Humaniora. Czasopismo Internetowe","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humaniora. Czasopismo Internetowe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/h.2021.2.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is no agreement among the students of the works of Al-Fārābī, Avicenna and Averroes on how their philosophy should be named. The following terms are most frequently used: Muslim philosophy, Arab philosophy, and Islamic philosophy. A closer look at the arguments of the supporters of each of these choices shows that the reason for those terminological discrepancies depends on the postulated relation between religion and philosophy, or more broadly, between religion and science. We emphasize either the ethnic aspect (Arab) or the dominant culture-forming factor (Islam) depending on the terminology chosen. This article aims to present and analyze the arguments of the supporters of each of the terms. The author focuses on philosophers living in the Middle Ages. The question of which of the aforementioned terms best represents the phenomenon in focus will be seen when we study those terms by putting them together in two pairs: the first, Arab philosophy – Muslim philosophy, and the second, Muslim philosophy – Islamic philosophy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究Al-Fārābī、阿维森纳和阿威罗的作品的学生对如何命名他们的哲学没有达成一致。以下是最常用的术语:穆斯林哲学、阿拉伯哲学和伊斯兰哲学。仔细观察每一种选择的支持者的论点就会发现,这些术语差异的原因取决于宗教与哲学之间,或者更广泛地说,宗教与科学之间的假定关系。根据选择的术语,我们要么强调民族方面(阿拉伯),要么强调主要的文化形成因素(伊斯兰教)。本文旨在介绍和分析每个术语的支持者的论点。作者关注的是生活在中世纪的哲学家。前面提到的术语中哪一个最能代表我们关注的现象,这个问题将在我们将这些术语放在两对中进行研究时看到:第一组是阿拉伯哲学-穆斯林哲学,第二组是穆斯林哲学-伊斯兰哲学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bracia polscy a Oświecenie Wyobrażenia i wiara w Boga dorosłych katolików w Polsce w drugiej połowie XX wieku i obu dekadach XXI wieku. Na podstawie wyników badań socjologicznych Wiara narodu i religijność w czasach zarazy – o przekształceniach pobożności Polaków Postsekularyzm między Wschodem i Zachodem Unraveling immortality and the genesis of human soul in st. Augustine’s selected works
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1