{"title":"UKRANIAN FACTOR IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF RUSSIAN IDENTITY","authors":"L. Fadeeva, D. S. Plotnikov","doi":"10.35634/2587-9030-2022-6-4-506-519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The transformation of Russian identity in the last 30 years has been influenced by both internal and external factors. As a rule, researchers attribute the policy of the West towards Russia to the most important external factors. In the opinion of the authors of this article, events and processes in the post-Soviet space, especially those taking place in Ukraine, are of no less importance. The article characterizes the impact of changes in political courses on the identification strategies of the political class of Russia and Ukraine, as a result of which they turned out to be not just different, but multidirectional. The work uses the traditional socio-constructivist approach for identity studies and the concept of identification matrices; discursive analysis was used as a method, the source base is presented both by publications and speeches of representatives of the political elite, and by data from public opinion polls and sociological surveys, which are secondary in nature. The conducted discursive analysis confirms that the most important point of divergence between the identification of Russia and Ukraine was the events that received the name “Orange Revolution” in Ukraine and caused value contradictions that contributed to the transition between the two countries into an open conflict after 2014. The severity of the reaction of Russian society to these discrepancies is explained by the stable traditions of perceiving Ukraine as a neighbor, as “Own”, due to which the change in value orientations and the political course of the Ukrainian elite towards Euro-Atlantic integration, accompanied and encouraged by anti-Russian rhetoric, the presentation of Russia as an oppressor and colonizer, began to be perceived and evaluated as a betrayal of the “brotherly” people, which destroys the Russian identity matrix .","PeriodicalId":263017,"journal":{"name":"Вестник Удмуртского университета. Социология. Политология. Международные отношения","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Вестник Удмуртского университета. Социология. Политология. Международные отношения","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35634/2587-9030-2022-6-4-506-519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The transformation of Russian identity in the last 30 years has been influenced by both internal and external factors. As a rule, researchers attribute the policy of the West towards Russia to the most important external factors. In the opinion of the authors of this article, events and processes in the post-Soviet space, especially those taking place in Ukraine, are of no less importance. The article characterizes the impact of changes in political courses on the identification strategies of the political class of Russia and Ukraine, as a result of which they turned out to be not just different, but multidirectional. The work uses the traditional socio-constructivist approach for identity studies and the concept of identification matrices; discursive analysis was used as a method, the source base is presented both by publications and speeches of representatives of the political elite, and by data from public opinion polls and sociological surveys, which are secondary in nature. The conducted discursive analysis confirms that the most important point of divergence between the identification of Russia and Ukraine was the events that received the name “Orange Revolution” in Ukraine and caused value contradictions that contributed to the transition between the two countries into an open conflict after 2014. The severity of the reaction of Russian society to these discrepancies is explained by the stable traditions of perceiving Ukraine as a neighbor, as “Own”, due to which the change in value orientations and the political course of the Ukrainian elite towards Euro-Atlantic integration, accompanied and encouraged by anti-Russian rhetoric, the presentation of Russia as an oppressor and colonizer, began to be perceived and evaluated as a betrayal of the “brotherly” people, which destroys the Russian identity matrix .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌克兰因素影响了俄罗斯身份的转变
在过去30年里,俄罗斯身份的转变受到内外因素的双重影响。通常,研究人员将西方对俄罗斯的政策归因于最重要的外部因素。在本文作者看来,后苏联空间中的事件和进程,特别是在乌克兰发生的事件和进程,同样重要。政治课程的变化对俄乌两国政治阶层认同策略的影响不仅是不同的,而且是多向的。这项工作使用传统的社会建构主义方法进行身份研究和身份矩阵的概念;使用话语分析作为一种方法,来源基础包括政治精英代表的出版物和演讲,以及民意调查和社会学调查的数据,这些数据本质上是次要的。所进行的话语分析证实,对俄罗斯和乌克兰的认同最重要的分歧点是在乌克兰被称为“橙色革命”的事件,这些事件造成了价值矛盾,导致两国在2014年之后转变为公开冲突。俄罗斯社会对这些差异反应的严重程度可以用将乌克兰视为邻国和“自己的”的稳定传统来解释,由于这种传统,价值取向的变化和乌克兰精英走向欧洲-大西洋一体化的政治路线,伴随着反俄言论和鼓励,将俄罗斯描述为压迫者和殖民者,开始被视为和评价为对“兄弟”人民的背叛。摧毁了俄罗斯人的身份矩阵
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FEATURES OF LATIN AMERICAN SOCIALISM ON THE EXAMPLE OF CHILE, BOLIVIA, VENEZUELA AND NICARAGUA SOCIAL ASPECTS OF MANAGING RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT OF NEURAL NETWORKS THE HISTORY OF ISLAM IN THE POLITICS OF MEMORY IN INDONESIA (mid-2010s to early 2020s) "MYSTERIOUS ALBION": NEGOTIATION BEHAVIOR PATTERN OF THE BRITISH SPECIFICS OF THE RUSSIAN COGNITARIATE OF GENERATION Z
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1