The relationship of cognitive impairment and clinical manifestations of myasthenia gravis

A. R. Alibekov, Vitaliy V. Goldobin, Hosiddin F. Yuldashev, E. Klocheva, A. Zuev
{"title":"The relationship of cognitive impairment and clinical manifestations of myasthenia gravis","authors":"A. R. Alibekov, Vitaliy V. Goldobin, Hosiddin F. Yuldashev, E. Klocheva, A. Zuev","doi":"10.17816/nb115213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND. There are many studies in the literature suggesting that cognitive impairment is more pronounced in patients with myasthenia gravis compared with healthy people, but there is no explanation of the reasons and mechanisms. However, the reverse character the influence of intellectual-mnestic disorders on the course of myasthenia gravis has not been studied enough. \nAIM. To compare clinical, anamnestiс, laboratory and instrumental data in patients with myasthenia gravis according to the presence or absence of cognitive impairment. \nMATERIAL AND METHODS. 61 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of myasthenia gravis were divided into 2 groups according to the Montreal cognitive test. Patients scoring 25 or less were assigned to the first group, those scoring 26 points or more to the second group. \nA comparative assessment was made according to the myasthenia gravis impairment index, age of onset, duration of the disease, duration of hospitalization, severity of myasthenia gravis according to clinical scales, body mass index, electroneuromyography data, levels of antibodies to the acetylcholine receptor and skeletal muscles, and daily doses of the drugs received. \nRESULTS. In the 1st group, there was a significantly higher score on the Generalised Disorders subscale of the Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index; the severity of Quantitative myasthenia gravis score was significantly higher in the 1st group than in the 2nd both for the total score and for the Musculoskeletal Lesions subscale. On average, 49 mg more pyridostigmine bromide was required in the first group, while the average body mass index was significantly lower in the first group. \nCONCLUSION. The presence of a cognitive deficit in patients with myasthenia gravis may worsen the clinical picture of the disease, which should be taken into account by clinicians, especially in elderly patients, who are at increased risk of developing cognitive disorders.","PeriodicalId":436189,"journal":{"name":"Neurology Bulletin","volume":"204 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/nb115213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND. There are many studies in the literature suggesting that cognitive impairment is more pronounced in patients with myasthenia gravis compared with healthy people, but there is no explanation of the reasons and mechanisms. However, the reverse character the influence of intellectual-mnestic disorders on the course of myasthenia gravis has not been studied enough. AIM. To compare clinical, anamnestiс, laboratory and instrumental data in patients with myasthenia gravis according to the presence or absence of cognitive impairment. MATERIAL AND METHODS. 61 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of myasthenia gravis were divided into 2 groups according to the Montreal cognitive test. Patients scoring 25 or less were assigned to the first group, those scoring 26 points or more to the second group. A comparative assessment was made according to the myasthenia gravis impairment index, age of onset, duration of the disease, duration of hospitalization, severity of myasthenia gravis according to clinical scales, body mass index, electroneuromyography data, levels of antibodies to the acetylcholine receptor and skeletal muscles, and daily doses of the drugs received. RESULTS. In the 1st group, there was a significantly higher score on the Generalised Disorders subscale of the Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index; the severity of Quantitative myasthenia gravis score was significantly higher in the 1st group than in the 2nd both for the total score and for the Musculoskeletal Lesions subscale. On average, 49 mg more pyridostigmine bromide was required in the first group, while the average body mass index was significantly lower in the first group. CONCLUSION. The presence of a cognitive deficit in patients with myasthenia gravis may worsen the clinical picture of the disease, which should be taken into account by clinicians, especially in elderly patients, who are at increased risk of developing cognitive disorders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症肌无力患者认知功能障碍与临床表现的关系
背景。文献中有许多研究表明重症肌无力患者的认知功能障碍比健康人更为明显,但其原因和机制尚未得到解释。然而,智力失忆障碍对重症肌无力病程的影响却没有得到足够的研究。的目标。比较重症肌无力患者是否存在认知障碍的临床、记忆、实验室和仪器数据。材料和方法。将61例确诊为重症肌无力的患者根据蒙特利尔认知测验分为两组。得分25分及以下的患者被分配到第一组,得分26分及以上的患者被分配到第二组。根据重症肌无力损害指数、发病年龄、病程、住院时间、重症肌无力严重程度(临床量表、体重指数、神经肌电图数据、乙酰胆碱受体抗体水平、骨骼肌抗体水平、每日给药剂量)进行比较评估。结果。在第一组中,重症肌无力损伤指数的广泛性障碍亚量表得分显著较高;不论是总分还是肌肉骨骼病变量表,第一组重症肌无力定量评分的严重程度均显著高于第二组。第一组平均多需要49毫克吡哆斯的明溴,而第一组的平均体重指数明显较低。结论。重症肌无力患者的认知缺陷的存在可能使该疾病的临床表现恶化,临床医生应该考虑到这一点,特别是老年患者,他们患认知障碍的风险增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Psychology and psychopathology of overvalue hobby schoolshooing ideas. The case of Katerina and Yakov Phenomenological approach in psychotherapy Comparative analysis of the clinical and social characteristics of persons with organic mental disorders suffering from mental retardation who have repeatedly committed socially dangerous acts Characteristics of depression treatment in men with testosterone deficiency Spiritual orientation of the psychological rehabilitation of combatants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1