Emerging Trends And Challenges In Science Education

A. E. Adesina, Elizabeth Tosin Gabriel
{"title":"Emerging Trends And Challenges In Science Education","authors":"A. E. Adesina, Elizabeth Tosin Gabriel","doi":"10.59231/sari7612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Science education has been recording dismal academic achievement, skills and attitudinal outcomes in Nigeria. The students, right from the basic education to the tertiary level lack 21st century skills of critical thinking, creativity, collaboration, communication, citizenship, self-regulation, time management, knowledge construction, problem solving, digital literacy skills and many other positive skills expedients for proper employability and entrepreneurship. The conventional, didactic, non-heuristic instructional strategy adopted in teaching science education in the country is already dated at the face of Covid-19 and post-Covid-19 pandemic. The National Science Teaching Association (NSTA, 2012, 2020) of America recommended the Next Generation Science Standard (NGSS) as the trending path to science education productivity through technology integration and reflective thinking. Cybernetics, constructivism and behaviorism theories buttressed the integrating of technology and reflective thinking in science education. Empirical findings equally justify teaching science technologically and with reflective thinking. There are challenges to technological integration in science education, the FUD factors (Fear, Uncertainties and Doubts) about the use of technology in science education, Inadequate ICTs policies and programmes, insufficient technological infrastructures, low ICTs skills and knowledge, poor attitudes to change (status quo sustenance), poor finance, poor management cum maintenance culture, and many other impinging challenges to effective technological integration in basic science education. Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) in ICTs infrastructural development in schools, adequate funding, training and re-training of science education teachers will allay major constraints to effective utilization of technology in basic science education for enhanced productivity.","PeriodicalId":447056,"journal":{"name":"Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59231/sari7612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Science education has been recording dismal academic achievement, skills and attitudinal outcomes in Nigeria. The students, right from the basic education to the tertiary level lack 21st century skills of critical thinking, creativity, collaboration, communication, citizenship, self-regulation, time management, knowledge construction, problem solving, digital literacy skills and many other positive skills expedients for proper employability and entrepreneurship. The conventional, didactic, non-heuristic instructional strategy adopted in teaching science education in the country is already dated at the face of Covid-19 and post-Covid-19 pandemic. The National Science Teaching Association (NSTA, 2012, 2020) of America recommended the Next Generation Science Standard (NGSS) as the trending path to science education productivity through technology integration and reflective thinking. Cybernetics, constructivism and behaviorism theories buttressed the integrating of technology and reflective thinking in science education. Empirical findings equally justify teaching science technologically and with reflective thinking. There are challenges to technological integration in science education, the FUD factors (Fear, Uncertainties and Doubts) about the use of technology in science education, Inadequate ICTs policies and programmes, insufficient technological infrastructures, low ICTs skills and knowledge, poor attitudes to change (status quo sustenance), poor finance, poor management cum maintenance culture, and many other impinging challenges to effective technological integration in basic science education. Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) in ICTs infrastructural development in schools, adequate funding, training and re-training of science education teachers will allay major constraints to effective utilization of technology in basic science education for enhanced productivity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学教育的新趋势和挑战
在尼日利亚,科学教育的学术成就、技能和态度结果都很糟糕。从基础教育到高等教育的学生,都缺乏21世纪的批判性思维、创造力、协作、沟通、公民意识、自律、时间管理、知识建构、解决问题、数字素养等技能,以及许多其他有利于就业和创业的积极技能。面对Covid-19和后Covid-19大流行,该国在科学教育教学中采用的传统、说教式、非启发式教学策略已经过时。美国国家科学教学协会(NSTA, 2012, 2020)推荐下一代科学标准(Next Generation Science Standard, NGSS)为通过技术整合和反思思维实现科学教育生产力的趋势路径。控制论、建构主义和行为主义理论支持了科学教育中技术与反思性思维的整合。实证研究结果同样证明了科学教学的技术性和反思性。科学教育中的技术整合面临挑战,科学教育中使用技术的FUD因素(恐惧、不确定性和疑虑),信息通信技术政策和计划不足,技术基础设施不足,信息通信技术技能和知识不足,对变革的态度不佳(维持现状),资金不足,管理和维护文化不佳,以及许多其他影响基础科学教育中有效技术整合的挑战。学校信息通信技术基础设施建设中的公私伙伴关系、充足的资金、科学教育教师的培训和再培训,将减轻在基础科学教育中有效利用技术以提高生产力的主要制约因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role Of Mindfulness And Stress Management In Enhancing Life Skills For Sustainable Living Entomological And Parasitological Indices Of Malaria Parasite Transmission In Imo State Polytechnic Omuma, Oru East, Nigeria Influence of Parental Religious and Socio–Economic Status on the Wholistic Development of Adolescents in Oyo Town Context Gender, Borders and Boundaries in Charlotte Bronte’s Jane Eyre Online Gaming Addiction and Its Impact on the Mental Health of Primary School Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1