Prostate cancer topography and tumour conspicuity on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis

P. Satish, A. Freeman, D. Kelly, A. Kirkham, C. Orczyk, B. Simpson, F. Giganti, H. Whitaker, M. Emberton, J. Norris
{"title":"Prostate cancer topography and tumour conspicuity on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"P. Satish, A. Freeman, D. Kelly, A. Kirkham, C. Orczyk, B. Simpson, F. Giganti, H. Whitaker, M. Emberton, J. Norris","doi":"10.7244/cmj.2021.04.001.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The implications of tumour location on mpMRI conspicuity are not fully understood. Identifying topographical correlates that influence conspicuity may improve outcomes. Here, we present the first systematic review and meta-analysis describing the effect of tumour location on prostate cancer conspicuity on mpMRI. Methods Medline, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were systematically searched and results were assessed as per the PRISMA statement. Differential tumour conspicuity on mpMRI was compared between cancers in the peripheral zone (PZ), transitional zone (TZ), base, apex, anterior and posterior. Meta-analysis was conducted to compare diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) of mpMRI detection for tumours in the PZ and TZ. PROSPERO registration: CRD42021228087. Results Thematic synthesis showed apical and basal tumours had reduced conspicuity compared to mid-gland tumours. Cancer in the TZ demonstrated increased conspicuity on T2-weighted imaging, whilst PZ cancers had higher conspicuity on diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast enhancement imaging. mpMRI had better diagnostic accuracy for PZ lesions, albeit higher specificity for TZ lesions. Meta-analysis showed an increased DOR for PZ tumours (OR: 7.206 [95% CI: 4.991;10.403], compared to TZ (OR: 5.310 [95% CI: 3.082; 9.151]). However, the test for subgroup differences was not significant (p = 0.2743). Conclusions Cancer in the apex or base of the prostate may be less conspicuous than mid-gland tumours. Similarly, TZ cancer appears to have reduced conspicuity compared to PZ cancer, however, meta-analysis did not show a significant difference between DOR. Future larger studies with prospective datasets are required to clarify the relationship between tumour position and conspicuity.","PeriodicalId":444929,"journal":{"name":"VIRTUAL ACADEMIC SURGERY CONFERENCE 2021 CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VIRTUAL ACADEMIC SURGERY CONFERENCE 2021 CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7244/cmj.2021.04.001.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction The implications of tumour location on mpMRI conspicuity are not fully understood. Identifying topographical correlates that influence conspicuity may improve outcomes. Here, we present the first systematic review and meta-analysis describing the effect of tumour location on prostate cancer conspicuity on mpMRI. Methods Medline, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were systematically searched and results were assessed as per the PRISMA statement. Differential tumour conspicuity on mpMRI was compared between cancers in the peripheral zone (PZ), transitional zone (TZ), base, apex, anterior and posterior. Meta-analysis was conducted to compare diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) of mpMRI detection for tumours in the PZ and TZ. PROSPERO registration: CRD42021228087. Results Thematic synthesis showed apical and basal tumours had reduced conspicuity compared to mid-gland tumours. Cancer in the TZ demonstrated increased conspicuity on T2-weighted imaging, whilst PZ cancers had higher conspicuity on diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast enhancement imaging. mpMRI had better diagnostic accuracy for PZ lesions, albeit higher specificity for TZ lesions. Meta-analysis showed an increased DOR for PZ tumours (OR: 7.206 [95% CI: 4.991;10.403], compared to TZ (OR: 5.310 [95% CI: 3.082; 9.151]). However, the test for subgroup differences was not significant (p = 0.2743). Conclusions Cancer in the apex or base of the prostate may be less conspicuous than mid-gland tumours. Similarly, TZ cancer appears to have reduced conspicuity compared to PZ cancer, however, meta-analysis did not show a significant difference between DOR. Future larger studies with prospective datasets are required to clarify the relationship between tumour position and conspicuity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多参数磁共振成像的前列腺癌地形图和肿瘤显著性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
肿瘤位置对mpMRI显著性的影响尚不完全清楚。确定影响显著性的地形相关因素可能会改善结果。在这里,我们提出了第一个系统回顾和荟萃分析,描述肿瘤位置对mpMRI上前列腺癌显著性的影响。方法系统检索Medline、PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库,并按照PRISMA声明对结果进行评估。比较外周区(PZ)、过渡区(TZ)、基底区、尖区、前区和后区肿瘤在mpMRI上的差异。荟萃分析比较mpMRI检测PZ和TZ肿瘤的诊断优势比(DOR)。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42021228087。结果主题综合显示,与中腺肿瘤相比,根尖肿瘤和基底肿瘤的显著性降低。TZ癌在t2加权成像上表现为显著性增强,而PZ癌在弥散加权和动态对比增强成像上表现为更高的显著性。mpMRI对PZ病变的诊断准确性较好,但对TZ病变的特异性较高。荟萃分析显示,PZ肿瘤的DOR (OR: 7.206 [95% CI: 4.991;10.403])高于TZ (OR: 5.310 [95% CI: 3.082;9.151])。然而,亚组差异检验不显著(p = 0.2743)。结论前列腺尖部或底部肿瘤较中腺体肿瘤不明显。同样,与PZ癌相比,TZ癌的显著性似乎降低了,然而,meta分析并未显示DOR之间的显着差异。未来需要更大规模的前瞻性数据集研究来阐明肿瘤位置和显著性之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Virtual interactive surgical skills classroom (VIRTUAL): a parallel-designed, non-inferiority, adjudicator-blinded, randomised controlled trial Prostate cancer topography and tumour conspicuity on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis Endoloops in Laparoscopic Appendicectomy: a Cost Effectiveness Analysis Ablative Therapies versus Partial Nephrectomy for Small Renal Masses – A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies Validating a novel visual field assessment app: A pilot study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1