Advocating for integrative medicine: providers' stories of resonance, negotiation, and community

Courtney Hook, B. Plump, P. Geist-Martin
{"title":"Advocating for integrative medicine: providers' stories of resonance, negotiation, and community","authors":"Courtney Hook, B. Plump, P. Geist-Martin","doi":"10.4081/QRMH.2018.7049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Integrative medicine (IM) is a holistic health care option that blends complementary, alternative medicine with biomedical models of care. Many medical care facilities do not offer IM treatment for patients, yet the demand for IM is growing. Therefore, IM providers are in the position of educating and promoting IM to patients and other medical practitioners. There is limited research literature focusing on how IM providers communicate advocacy for IM. Therefore, this research is designed to explore the perspectives of providers about the ways that they communicate advocacy for IM in their lives and their medical practice. Interview data we collected at The Center reveals the ways that IM providers continuously advocate for IM through their resonance with IM philosophy, by negotiating systemic tensions that revolve around IM, and by forming communities of practice with patients and other providers. Results of this investigation offer insight about IM, communication, and advocacy.","PeriodicalId":375726,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in Medicine and Healthcare","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research in Medicine and Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/QRMH.2018.7049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Integrative medicine (IM) is a holistic health care option that blends complementary, alternative medicine with biomedical models of care. Many medical care facilities do not offer IM treatment for patients, yet the demand for IM is growing. Therefore, IM providers are in the position of educating and promoting IM to patients and other medical practitioners. There is limited research literature focusing on how IM providers communicate advocacy for IM. Therefore, this research is designed to explore the perspectives of providers about the ways that they communicate advocacy for IM in their lives and their medical practice. Interview data we collected at The Center reveals the ways that IM providers continuously advocate for IM through their resonance with IM philosophy, by negotiating systemic tensions that revolve around IM, and by forming communities of practice with patients and other providers. Results of this investigation offer insight about IM, communication, and advocacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
倡导整合医学:提供者的共鸣、谈判和社区故事
综合医学(IM)是一种综合医疗保健选择,它将补充、替代医学与生物医学模式相结合。许多医疗机构不为患者提供即时通讯治疗,但对即时通讯的需求正在增长。因此,即时通讯提供者处于向患者和其他医疗从业者教育和推广即时通讯的位置。有有限的研究文献关注即时通讯提供商如何沟通宣传即时通讯。因此,本研究旨在探讨提供者在其生活和医疗实践中宣传IM的方式的观点。我们在该中心收集的访谈数据揭示了即时通讯提供者通过他们与即时通讯哲学的共鸣,通过协商围绕即时通讯的系统紧张局势,以及通过与患者和其他提供者形成实践社区,不断倡导即时通讯的方式。这项调查的结果提供了关于即时通讯,沟通和宣传的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Healthcare providers’ narratives about interactionally troubling patient exchanges: Accounting for and against an active patient role Screen time, mute, mixed messages, and panic: An international auto-ethnographic study of knowledge workers during a pandemic Debating claims of fact in public health: A pedagogical activity Lessons learned from qualitative fieldwork in a multilingual setting A qualitative analysis and evaluation of social support received after experiencing a broken marriage engagement and impacts on holistic health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1