F. Dostoevsky’s Underground Man and His Accusations to Modernity

Dainius Genys
{"title":"F. Dostoevsky’s Underground Man and His Accusations to Modernity","authors":"Dainius Genys","doi":"10.15388/litera.2022.64.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fyodor Dostoevsky’s literary art has served for centuries as a source of inspiration for scholars of different disciplines, opening up inexhaustible avenues of insight into human existence. The symbolic subtext of the article is an attempt to apply sociological imagination to the review of a literatural masterpiece, reconstructing and conceptualizing the author’s attitudes towards modernization. The academic intrigue stems from the question – how does modernization define a person and how does a person feel in a new society? Dostoevsky’s prominent conflict between the underground man and the social determinants that oppress him is conceptualized from sociological point of view. Through systematic and comparative analysis, the article also highlights Dostoevsky’s attitude to modernization, which is discussed in the broader context of ideas in E. Durkheim’s, Z. Bauman’s, V. Kavolis’s, Ch. Taylor’s, R. Inglehart’s, A. Giddens’s, etc. works.","PeriodicalId":432201,"journal":{"name":"Literatūra","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literatūra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/litera.2022.64.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fyodor Dostoevsky’s literary art has served for centuries as a source of inspiration for scholars of different disciplines, opening up inexhaustible avenues of insight into human existence. The symbolic subtext of the article is an attempt to apply sociological imagination to the review of a literatural masterpiece, reconstructing and conceptualizing the author’s attitudes towards modernization. The academic intrigue stems from the question – how does modernization define a person and how does a person feel in a new society? Dostoevsky’s prominent conflict between the underground man and the social determinants that oppress him is conceptualized from sociological point of view. Through systematic and comparative analysis, the article also highlights Dostoevsky’s attitude to modernization, which is discussed in the broader context of ideas in E. Durkheim’s, Z. Bauman’s, V. Kavolis’s, Ch. Taylor’s, R. Inglehart’s, A. Giddens’s, etc. works.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
陀思妥耶夫斯基的《地下人》及其对现代性的指责
几个世纪以来,陀思妥耶夫斯基的文学艺术一直是不同学科学者的灵感源泉,为洞悉人类存在开辟了取之不尽的途径。这篇文章的象征潜台词是试图用社会学的想象力来审视一部文学巨著,重构和概念化作者对现代化的态度。学术上的阴谋源于这样一个问题:现代化如何定义一个人?一个人在新社会中的感受如何?陀思妥耶夫斯基的地下人与压迫他的社会决定因素之间的突出冲突是从社会学的角度概念化的。通过系统的比较分析,本文还突出了陀思妥耶夫斯基对现代化的态度,并在迪尔凯姆、鲍曼、卡沃利斯、泰勒、英格哈特、吉登斯等人的作品中进行了更广泛的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Uždaros visuomenės fenomenologija Antano Vienuolio „Paskenduolėje“: antropologiniai profiliai Lietuvių literatūros kanono horizontai ir peripetijos Trumpoji draminė forma Kosto Ostrausko ir Juozo Erlicko kūryboje Žemininkai Vilniuje: santykis su daugiataučio miesto erdve „Peržengti kaustančias ribas...“: keli Vandos Zaborskaitės biografijos papildymai
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1