Migrant Qualification Recognition as Control: Governmentality, Education and the Movement of People between Borders

P. Hurley, J. Brooks, J. Wilkinson
{"title":"Migrant Qualification Recognition as Control: Governmentality, Education and the Movement of People between Borders","authors":"P. Hurley, J. Brooks, J. Wilkinson","doi":"10.1108/978-1-78756-044-420191007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nThis chapter will use the lens of Foucault’s governmentality to critique the use of foreign qualification recognition (FQR) in Australia’s skilled migration programme. Foucault suggests that an imperative for governments is to find ways to manage its population to ensure its security and well-being. Foucault notes the explosion of measures designed to facilitate this imperative. We argue that FQR’s use in Australia’s skilled migration programme is another such measure. It is a process designed to ascertain the relative value of one person against another using educational attainment as the meter. We examine the literature on the subject and find there are three key themes: scale, barriers and the persistence of the problem. We explore the concept of value in FQR and find arguments are divisible according to two camps. The first finds that an education qualification represents some objective and meritocratic value that a migrant possesses and that the barriers and persistence of problems are traceable to an inability to find the right way to realize this value. The second supposes that qualifications essentially represent a claim that need not have any basis in a form of essential value. Using Foucault’s governmentality, we suggest that FQR’s primary source of value in Australia’s skilled migration process is its utility as a part of a regime that identifies and classifies migrants and establishes a regime with which to assure governments of the acquisition of a population it believes are most likely to contribute to its security and future prosperity.","PeriodicalId":338426,"journal":{"name":"Education, Immigration and Migration","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education, Immigration and Migration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78756-044-420191007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This chapter will use the lens of Foucault’s governmentality to critique the use of foreign qualification recognition (FQR) in Australia’s skilled migration programme. Foucault suggests that an imperative for governments is to find ways to manage its population to ensure its security and well-being. Foucault notes the explosion of measures designed to facilitate this imperative. We argue that FQR’s use in Australia’s skilled migration programme is another such measure. It is a process designed to ascertain the relative value of one person against another using educational attainment as the meter. We examine the literature on the subject and find there are three key themes: scale, barriers and the persistence of the problem. We explore the concept of value in FQR and find arguments are divisible according to two camps. The first finds that an education qualification represents some objective and meritocratic value that a migrant possesses and that the barriers and persistence of problems are traceable to an inability to find the right way to realize this value. The second supposes that qualifications essentially represent a claim that need not have any basis in a form of essential value. Using Foucault’s governmentality, we suggest that FQR’s primary source of value in Australia’s skilled migration process is its utility as a part of a regime that identifies and classifies migrants and establishes a regime with which to assure governments of the acquisition of a population it believes are most likely to contribute to its security and future prosperity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为控制的移民资格认可:治理、教育和人们在边境之间的流动
本章将使用福柯的治理理论来批判澳大利亚技术移民计划中外国资格认证(FQR)的使用。福柯认为,政府的当务之急是找到管理人口的方法,以确保其安全和福祉。福柯注意到旨在促进这一必要性的措施的爆炸式增长。我们认为,FQR在澳大利亚技术移民计划中的使用是另一种这样的措施。这是一个旨在确定一个人与另一个人的相对价值的过程,使用教育程度作为衡量标准。我们研究了有关该主题的文献,发现有三个关键主题:规模、障碍和问题的持久性。我们对FQR中的价值概念进行了探讨,发现争论可以分为两个阵营。第一个发现,教育资格代表了移民所拥有的一些客观和精英价值,问题的障碍和持续存在可追溯到无法找到实现这一价值的正确途径。第二种假设是,资格基本上代表了一种主张,这种主张不需要有任何基本价值形式的基础。利用福柯的治理理论,我们认为FQR在澳大利亚技术移民过程中的主要价值来源是它作为一种制度的一部分的效用,这种制度可以识别和分类移民,并建立一种制度,以确保政府获得它认为最有可能为其安全和未来繁荣做出贡献的人口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leading K–12 Refugee Integration: A GENTLE Approach from Ontario, Canada Refugees in Their Own Land: The Challenge of Managing a School in a Palestinian Refugee Camp in the Divided City of Jerusalem Migrants, Immigrants, Refugees and Other Boxes into Which We Put One Another Dramatic Experiences of Educators Coping with the Influx of Syrian Refugees in Syrian Schools in Turkey Leadership and Policy Dilemmas: Syrian Newcomers as Future Citizens of Ontario, Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1