Can Design Teachers Evaluate Students’ Products from an End-User Point-of-View?

Barbara N.E. Kok abc, Karin Slegers b, Peter Vink c
{"title":"Can Design Teachers Evaluate Students’ Products from an End-User Point-of-View?","authors":"Barbara N.E. Kok abc, Karin Slegers b, Peter Vink c","doi":"10.54941/ahfe100311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of design education is to teach future designers to create products that fulfil the needs, wishes and expectations of the targeted users. Therefore, it seems reasonable that teachers in design education should have knowledge on how users experience products and apply this in the evaluation of design assignments. The question is whether ‘teachers are able to estimate the user experience?’. To answer this question the correlation between the assessment of products done by users and by teachers is analysed, by assessing 76 products designed by students. The teachers assessment correlated strongly to the assessment done by a jury of end users, (ρ = 0.743, α < 0.000), if the products designed for general target groups (i.e. adults between 18 and 65 years of age without special disabilities or very specific problems and needs). However, no correlation was found between the assessment of teachers and a jury of end users of products designed for people with disabilities or very specific problems and needs (such as bed bound hospitalized children).\n","PeriodicalId":415611,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Social and Organizational Factors","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Social and Organizational Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe100311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of design education is to teach future designers to create products that fulfil the needs, wishes and expectations of the targeted users. Therefore, it seems reasonable that teachers in design education should have knowledge on how users experience products and apply this in the evaluation of design assignments. The question is whether ‘teachers are able to estimate the user experience?’. To answer this question the correlation between the assessment of products done by users and by teachers is analysed, by assessing 76 products designed by students. The teachers assessment correlated strongly to the assessment done by a jury of end users, (ρ = 0.743, α < 0.000), if the products designed for general target groups (i.e. adults between 18 and 65 years of age without special disabilities or very specific problems and needs). However, no correlation was found between the assessment of teachers and a jury of end users of products designed for people with disabilities or very specific problems and needs (such as bed bound hospitalized children).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
设计教师能否从终端用户的角度评估学生的产品?
设计教育的目的是教会未来的设计师创造出满足目标用户需求、愿望和期望的产品。因此,设计教育中的教师应该了解用户如何体验产品,并将其应用于设计作业的评估中,这似乎是合理的。问题是“教师是否能够评估用户体验?”为了回答这个问题,通过评估学生设计的76种产品,分析了用户和教师对产品的评估之间的相关性。如果产品是为一般目标群体(即18至65岁的成年人,没有特殊残疾或非常特殊的问题和需求)设计的,那么教师的评估与最终用户评审团的评估密切相关(ρ = 0.743, α < 0.000)。然而,没有发现教师的评估与为残疾人或非常具体的问题和需求(如卧床的住院儿童)设计的产品的最终用户评审团之间的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PUMA - Development and Application of a Tool for Supporting Nuclear Power Plant Operating Teams in Unexpected and Unknown Situations Environmental Problems Among Rural Women and Management of Occupational Health and Safety Development of QOC Matrix- The Worker's Voice (part 1) Humanization of Work in Project Management Descriptive Evidence of the Work-Family Compensation among Japanese Midwives: Using the Multiple Role Map Program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1