I Assure You, We Have the Strictest Alien Act Possible! The Emergence of the Concept of "Risky Immigrants" in Denmark

K. Villadsen
{"title":"I Assure You, We Have the Strictest Alien Act Possible! The Emergence of the Concept of \"Risky Immigrants\" in Denmark","authors":"K. Villadsen","doi":"10.1215/10418385-8241934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay tells the story of how Denmark transformed from a very welcoming and tolerant country to one whose prime ministers reassure its residents, \"We have the strictest Alien Act possible.\" The approach is genealogical, following Michel Foucault, and the empirical focal point is Danish immigration policies as they evolved from the late 1960s until today. This development culminates in the emergence of the \"restrictionist policy paradigm,\" which associates immigrants with risks like economic burdens, high unemployment levels, crimes, undemocratic attitudes, and the development of ghettos. From the perspective of the welfare project, the immigrants became \"risky\" as they were profiled in terms of their higher probability of developing suboptimal or dysfunctional behaviors that endanger the welfare state. The Danish experience is analyzed from a broader thesis on the welfare state as caught up between welfarist universality, industrial-capitalist expansion, and sovereign territoriality. Drawing on Foucault's work, these different logics of statehood are analyzed as evolving constellations of law, discipline, and security. Danish immigration policy mutates over time so that policies of security premised on free circulation gradually give way to discipline and legal sovereignty that block, filter, and segregate immigrants. Alongside this movement toward territorial enclosure, the discursive construction of the immigrant changes fundamentally.","PeriodicalId":232457,"journal":{"name":"Qui Parle: Critical Humanities and Social Sciences","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qui Parle: Critical Humanities and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10418385-8241934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This essay tells the story of how Denmark transformed from a very welcoming and tolerant country to one whose prime ministers reassure its residents, "We have the strictest Alien Act possible." The approach is genealogical, following Michel Foucault, and the empirical focal point is Danish immigration policies as they evolved from the late 1960s until today. This development culminates in the emergence of the "restrictionist policy paradigm," which associates immigrants with risks like economic burdens, high unemployment levels, crimes, undemocratic attitudes, and the development of ghettos. From the perspective of the welfare project, the immigrants became "risky" as they were profiled in terms of their higher probability of developing suboptimal or dysfunctional behaviors that endanger the welfare state. The Danish experience is analyzed from a broader thesis on the welfare state as caught up between welfarist universality, industrial-capitalist expansion, and sovereign territoriality. Drawing on Foucault's work, these different logics of statehood are analyzed as evolving constellations of law, discipline, and security. Danish immigration policy mutates over time so that policies of security premised on free circulation gradually give way to discipline and legal sovereignty that block, filter, and segregate immigrants. Alongside this movement toward territorial enclosure, the discursive construction of the immigrant changes fundamentally.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我向你保证,我们有最严格的外星人法案!丹麦“风险移民”概念的产生
摘要:本文讲述了丹麦如何从一个非常欢迎和宽容的国家转变为一个首相向其居民保证“我们有最严格的外国人法案”的国家。按照米歇尔·福柯(Michel Foucault)的说法,这种方法是宗谱学的,经验主义的焦点是丹麦移民政策从20世纪60年代末到今天的演变。这种发展最终导致了“限制主义政策范式”的出现,将移民与经济负担、高失业率、犯罪、不民主的态度和贫民窟的发展等风险联系在一起。从福利项目的角度来看,移民变得“有风险”,因为他们被描述为更有可能发展出危害福利国家的次优或功能失调行为。丹麦的经验是从福利国家陷入福利主义普遍性、工业资本主义扩张和主权领土之间的更广泛的论文中分析出来的。根据福柯的著作,这些不同的国家逻辑被分析为法律、纪律和安全的演化星座。随着时间的推移,丹麦的移民政策发生了变化,以自由流动为前提的安全政策逐渐让位于阻碍、过滤和隔离移民的纪律和法律主权。伴随着这种领土圈地运动,移民的话语建构也发生了根本性的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dispossession and Totality Beyond Desire An Afropessimist, Antidisciplinary Rejoinder to History, Its Human, and Its Anti-Blackness Deconstruction and Anastasis Nancy's Prophetic Voice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1