What Are Institutional Groups?

Miguel Garcia-Godinez
{"title":"What Are Institutional Groups?","authors":"Miguel Garcia-Godinez","doi":"10.1515/9783110663617-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We are all members of some institutional group or another, and we may all be members of different institutional groups at the same time (e.g., someone can be a faculty member, the goalie of a football team and a UK citizen simultaneously). Since being a member of an institutional group involves occupying a certain role assigned with certain normative attributes (viz., rights, duties, powers and responsibilities), our institutional membership shapes to an important extent the way we interact with each other in our everyday life. Crucially, though, institutional groups cannot exist independently of our social interaction. On the contrary, they exist as particular forms of social organisation. In this paper I present an ontological analysis of institutional groups that elaborates on this idea and shows how, when so organised, we can create more complex and sophisticated social entities, e.g., institutions. In the following sections, I introduce and argue for three main theses. In §2 I claim that an institutional group is a realisation of a formal group structure. In arguing for this thesis, I improve on Ritchie’s ontological structuralism. In §3 I hold that institutional groups can perform intentional actions. This thesis results from an ontological analysis of institutional and proxy agency akin to Ludwig’s theory of collective action. In §4 I distinguish between institutions and institutional groups and state that the former are institutional practices. I take up this issue here, firstly, because I consider misleading some of the characterisations of institutions that prominent social ontologists have recently offered (e.g., Searle, Guala and Ludwig), and, secondly, because I think it is important to clarify the way institutional groups create institutions. By following Tuomela, I argue that institutions consist in institutional activities conducive to the realisation (or “satisfaction”) of institutional activity types. Since this realisation is carried out by institutional groups, our having an answer to what are institutional groups? is a necessary step towards a better understanding of what institutions are and how we create them.","PeriodicalId":400729,"journal":{"name":"Social Ontology, Normativity and Law","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Ontology, Normativity and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110663617-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We are all members of some institutional group or another, and we may all be members of different institutional groups at the same time (e.g., someone can be a faculty member, the goalie of a football team and a UK citizen simultaneously). Since being a member of an institutional group involves occupying a certain role assigned with certain normative attributes (viz., rights, duties, powers and responsibilities), our institutional membership shapes to an important extent the way we interact with each other in our everyday life. Crucially, though, institutional groups cannot exist independently of our social interaction. On the contrary, they exist as particular forms of social organisation. In this paper I present an ontological analysis of institutional groups that elaborates on this idea and shows how, when so organised, we can create more complex and sophisticated social entities, e.g., institutions. In the following sections, I introduce and argue for three main theses. In §2 I claim that an institutional group is a realisation of a formal group structure. In arguing for this thesis, I improve on Ritchie’s ontological structuralism. In §3 I hold that institutional groups can perform intentional actions. This thesis results from an ontological analysis of institutional and proxy agency akin to Ludwig’s theory of collective action. In §4 I distinguish between institutions and institutional groups and state that the former are institutional practices. I take up this issue here, firstly, because I consider misleading some of the characterisations of institutions that prominent social ontologists have recently offered (e.g., Searle, Guala and Ludwig), and, secondly, because I think it is important to clarify the way institutional groups create institutions. By following Tuomela, I argue that institutions consist in institutional activities conducive to the realisation (or “satisfaction”) of institutional activity types. Since this realisation is carried out by institutional groups, our having an answer to what are institutional groups? is a necessary step towards a better understanding of what institutions are and how we create them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
什么是机构团体?
我们都是这样或那样的机构团体的成员,我们可能同时都是不同机构团体的成员(例如,某人可以同时是教员、足球队的守门员和英国公民)。由于作为一个制度群体的成员,需要承担特定的角色,这些角色被赋予了特定的规范属性(即权利、义务、权力和责任),我们的制度成员身份在很大程度上决定了我们在日常生活中彼此互动的方式。然而,至关重要的是,制度团体不能独立于我们的社会互动而存在。相反,它们是作为社会组织的特殊形式而存在的。在本文中,我对制度群体进行了本体论分析,详细阐述了这一观点,并展示了在这样组织的情况下,我们如何能够创造更复杂、更复杂的社会实体,例如制度。在接下来的章节中,我将介绍并论证三个主要论点。在§2中,我宣称一个制度集团是一个正式集团结构的实现。在本文的论证中,我对里奇的本体论结构主义进行了改进。在§3中,我认为制度团体可以执行有意的行为。本文是对制度和代理的本体论分析的结果,类似于路德维希的集体行动理论。在§4中,我区分了制度和制度群体,并指出前者是制度实践。我在这里讨论这个问题,首先是因为我认为一些著名的社会本体论家最近提出的制度特征是有误导性的(例如,Searle, Guala和Ludwig),其次是因为我认为澄清制度群体创造制度的方式是很重要的。通过遵循图梅拉,我认为制度存在于有助于实现(或“满足”)制度活动类型的制度活动中。由于这种实现是由机构团体来实现的,我们对什么是机构团体有一个答案吗?是更好地理解什么是机构以及我们如何创建机构的必要步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Varieties of Normativity: Reasons, Expectations, Wide-Scope Oughts, and Ought-to-be’s What Are Institutional Groups? The Social Construction of Legal Norms The Right to Press Freedom of Expression vs the Rights of Marginalised Groups: An Answer Grounded in Personhood Rights Frontmatter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1