Security of Supply, the Role of Interconnectors and Option Values : insights from the GB Capacity Auction

David Newbery and Michael Grubb
{"title":"Security of Supply, the Role of Interconnectors and Option Values : insights from the GB Capacity Auction","authors":"David Newbery and Michael Grubb","doi":"10.5547/2160-5890.4.2.DNEW","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The UK Government has carefully designed a Capacity Mechanism to deliver reliable electricity. This paper criticises the determination of the amount to procure, and argues that the amount set for the first auction was excessive, particularly (but not exclusively) in ignoring the contribution from interconnectors. Too little attention was given to either the political economy or the option value aspects. Procuring too little raises fears of 'the lights going out', but over-procurement increases consumer costs; undermines renewables by transferring capped finance to fossil generators; and impedes the Single Market including by weakening the business case for interconnectors. Making more use of the demand-side and potentially available 'latent' capacity lowers risk and increases options allowing more capacity procurement to be deferred. Capacity markets are intended to address problems of 'missing money' in terms of energy-only market incentives to invest; but over-procurement risks exacerbating the underlying problem, whereas addressing market failures and missing markets, and properly accounting for interconnectors, reduces the underlying problem.","PeriodicalId":385400,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy","volume":"53 57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.4.2.DNEW","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

The UK Government has carefully designed a Capacity Mechanism to deliver reliable electricity. This paper criticises the determination of the amount to procure, and argues that the amount set for the first auction was excessive, particularly (but not exclusively) in ignoring the contribution from interconnectors. Too little attention was given to either the political economy or the option value aspects. Procuring too little raises fears of 'the lights going out', but over-procurement increases consumer costs; undermines renewables by transferring capped finance to fossil generators; and impedes the Single Market including by weakening the business case for interconnectors. Making more use of the demand-side and potentially available 'latent' capacity lowers risk and increases options allowing more capacity procurement to be deferred. Capacity markets are intended to address problems of 'missing money' in terms of energy-only market incentives to invest; but over-procurement risks exacerbating the underlying problem, whereas addressing market failures and missing markets, and properly accounting for interconnectors, reduces the underlying problem.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
供应安全,互连者的角色和选择价值:来自GB容量拍卖的见解
英国政府精心设计了一个容量机制,以提供可靠的电力。本文批评了采购金额的确定,并认为第一次拍卖的金额过高,特别是(但不是唯一的)忽略了互连者的贡献。对政治经济和期权价值方面的关注都太少。采购太少会引起人们对“停电”的担忧,但过度采购会增加消费者成本;将有上限的资金转移给化石发电企业,从而破坏可再生能源;并阻碍单一市场,包括削弱互联互通的商业理由。更多地利用需求方和潜在的“潜在”产能可以降低风险,增加选择,从而推迟更多的产能采购。产能市场旨在解决“缺钱”的问题,即能源市场对投资的激励;但是,过度采购可能会加剧潜在问题,而解决市场失灵和缺失市场问题,并妥善考虑相互关联的因素,则会减少潜在问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Facilitating Transmission Expansion to Support Efficient Decarbonization of the Electricity Sector Modelling Net Zero and Sector Coupling: Lessons for European Policy Makers The Cost of Finance and the Cost of Carbon: A Case Study of Britain’s only PWR Biomethane for Electricity in Mexico: A Prospective Economic Analysis Aiming for Carbon Neutrality: Which Environmental Taxes Does Spain Need by 2030?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1