The Belgrade Circle of Mitrinović’s Followers in the Light of Archival Sources

N. Radulović
{"title":"The Belgrade Circle of Mitrinović’s Followers in the Light of Archival Sources","authors":"N. Radulović","doi":"10.58199/nicholaistudies/ns.2023.3.5.41-70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to focus on the connections of Dimitrije Mitrinović (1887–1953) with the Serbian branch of his followers. Additionally, we will pay attention to the place of Nicholai Velimirovich in the circle of Mitrinović’s network. After research based on the archive material of the New Atlantis Foundation (Bradford), we show that the circle of panhumanists from the twenties of the last century was essentially the Serbian branch of Mitrinović’s network (Miloš Đurić, Pavle Jevtić, Vladeta Popović, Dušan Stojanović). Apart from the work on spreading the ideas of Mitrinović, this circle was devoted to occult practice, also under the leadership of a teacher from London. Nicholai Velimirovich, who during his stay in London connected with Mitrinović’s environment, distanced himself from this group after the First World War, to their disappointment. The correspondence of Mitrinović’s followers with Mitrinović from the post–war years reveals how they saw this change in Velimirovich as an abandonment of joint work. In addition, some of Velimirovich’s words that they convey to Mitrinović reveal his clear desire to move away from them. As it is well known, Velimirovich continued on his way. On the other hand, what is more important than the contacts is the influence of Mitrinović’s ideas. All the mentioned names are bearers of a movement that has been called differently — most often “panhumanism.” We can say that Mitrinović’s group is the core and originator of panhumanism in the interwar culture, whose themes then spread to other authors. Considering the importance of panhumanism, the presence of this group in culture is longer (since the early twenties of the 20th century) and more influential than it would seem from the life of the two magazines, and this also means that Mitrinović was more present in the Serbian environment than it seems at first glance. Even if indirectly, he was present through his followers. Velimirovich, who accepted panhumanism during his younger years, however, later moved away from panhumanistic concepts and Mitrinović.","PeriodicalId":117451,"journal":{"name":"The Nicholai Studies International Journal for Research of Theological and Ecclesiastical Contribution of Nicholai Velimirovich","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Nicholai Studies International Journal for Research of Theological and Ecclesiastical Contribution of Nicholai Velimirovich","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58199/nicholaistudies/ns.2023.3.5.41-70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to focus on the connections of Dimitrije Mitrinović (1887–1953) with the Serbian branch of his followers. Additionally, we will pay attention to the place of Nicholai Velimirovich in the circle of Mitrinović’s network. After research based on the archive material of the New Atlantis Foundation (Bradford), we show that the circle of panhumanists from the twenties of the last century was essentially the Serbian branch of Mitrinović’s network (Miloš Đurić, Pavle Jevtić, Vladeta Popović, Dušan Stojanović). Apart from the work on spreading the ideas of Mitrinović, this circle was devoted to occult practice, also under the leadership of a teacher from London. Nicholai Velimirovich, who during his stay in London connected with Mitrinović’s environment, distanced himself from this group after the First World War, to their disappointment. The correspondence of Mitrinović’s followers with Mitrinović from the post–war years reveals how they saw this change in Velimirovich as an abandonment of joint work. In addition, some of Velimirovich’s words that they convey to Mitrinović reveal his clear desire to move away from them. As it is well known, Velimirovich continued on his way. On the other hand, what is more important than the contacts is the influence of Mitrinović’s ideas. All the mentioned names are bearers of a movement that has been called differently — most often “panhumanism.” We can say that Mitrinović’s group is the core and originator of panhumanism in the interwar culture, whose themes then spread to other authors. Considering the importance of panhumanism, the presence of this group in culture is longer (since the early twenties of the 20th century) and more influential than it would seem from the life of the two magazines, and this also means that Mitrinović was more present in the Serbian environment than it seems at first glance. Even if indirectly, he was present through his followers. Velimirovich, who accepted panhumanism during his younger years, however, later moved away from panhumanistic concepts and Mitrinović.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从档案资料看米特里诺维奇在贝尔格莱德的追随者圈子
本文的目的是集中在Dimitrije mitrinoviki(1887-1953)与他的追随者的塞尔维亚分支的联系。此外,我们将关注尼古拉·韦利米罗维奇在米特里诺维奇网络圈子中的地位。根据新亚特兰蒂斯基金会(Bradford)的档案资料进行研究后,我们表明,上世纪20年代的泛人文主义圈子基本上是米特里诺维奇网络的塞尔维亚分支(milosi Đurić, Pavle jevtiki, Vladeta popoviki, Dušan stojanoviki)。除了传播米特里诺维奇的思想之外,这个圈子还致力于神秘学的实践,也是在一位来自伦敦的老师的领导下。尼古拉·韦利米罗维奇在伦敦逗留期间与米特里诺维奇的环境保持着联系,但在第一次世界大战后,他与这一团体疏远了,这使他们感到失望。米特里诺维奇的追随者与米特里诺维奇在战后的通信揭示了他们是如何将维里米罗维奇的这种变化视为放弃共同工作的。此外,他们传达给米特里诺维奇的一些维利米罗维奇的话表明了他想要离开他们的明确愿望。大家都知道,韦利米罗维奇继续往前走。另一方面,比接触更重要的是米特里诺维奇思想的影响。所有提到的名字都是一个运动的代表,这个运动有不同的称呼——最常见的是“泛人道主义”。我们可以说,米特里诺维奇的小组是两次世界大战之间文化中泛人道主义的核心和创始人,其主题随后传播给其他作者。考虑到泛人道主义的重要性,这个群体在文化中的存在时间更长(自20世纪20年代初以来),比两本杂志的生活更有影响力,这也意味着米特里诺维奇在塞尔维亚环境中的存在比乍一看要多。即使是间接地,他也通过他的追随者在场。维利米罗维奇,在他年轻的时候接受了泛人道主义,然而,后来离开了泛人道主义的概念和米特里诺维奇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bishop Nicholai of Žiča in Vojlovica Monastery — Captivity, Activity, and Heritage Image of Bishop Nicholai Velimirovich in the Works of Bishop Jovan Velimirović Bishop Nicholai Velimirovich as the Comforter of Grieving Parents There is no Reality in this World until it comes down from Heaven On Saint Nicholai by the Pen of a Linguist
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1