Introduction: Towering Judges – A Conceptual and Comparative Analysis

R. Abeyratne, Iddo Porat
{"title":"Introduction: Towering Judges – A Conceptual and Comparative Analysis","authors":"R. Abeyratne, Iddo Porat","doi":"10.1017/9781108879194.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This volume is a collection of essays on a new topic in comparative constitutional law: towering judges. The volume discusses nineteen judges of apex and constitutional courts from fourteen jurisdictions. Within their particular political, historical, and institutional settings, each of these judges made a significant impact on the trajectory and development of constitutional law. These judges towered over their peers to distinguish themselves in the local context and, in some cases, globally. Some of these judges became well-known public figures, cultural icons, or political leaders. Some acted in crucial moments in their country’s constitutional history or led their court in a new direction. Others acted in less fraught times and were known primarily within the legal profession. Some were uncontrovertibly respected and valued, while others were complex figures that were subject to debate and criticism. All of them, however, were able to shine individually to an uncommon degree in a profession where individualism is not always looked on favorably. That there are such judges, we think, is indisputable. Everyone can intuit the “towering” judges in their own jurisdiction. But this is the first in-depth study of this phenomenon within the field of comparative constitutional law. The term “towering judge” and the questions we pose about these judges are novel. What makes for a towering judge and what are the possible parameters for assessing their “towering-ness”? What are the background conditions that foster or deter the rise of towering judges? Are towering judges, on balance, positive or detrimental for a constitutional system? How do towering judges differ from one country to another and what are the comparative and global effects on towering judges? How do historical and social development relate to this phenomenon, and is it part of “global constitutionalism”? These questions will be at the center of this volume, and are answered by the rich, varied chapters that comprise it.","PeriodicalId":405539,"journal":{"name":"Towering Judges","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Towering Judges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108879194.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This volume is a collection of essays on a new topic in comparative constitutional law: towering judges. The volume discusses nineteen judges of apex and constitutional courts from fourteen jurisdictions. Within their particular political, historical, and institutional settings, each of these judges made a significant impact on the trajectory and development of constitutional law. These judges towered over their peers to distinguish themselves in the local context and, in some cases, globally. Some of these judges became well-known public figures, cultural icons, or political leaders. Some acted in crucial moments in their country’s constitutional history or led their court in a new direction. Others acted in less fraught times and were known primarily within the legal profession. Some were uncontrovertibly respected and valued, while others were complex figures that were subject to debate and criticism. All of them, however, were able to shine individually to an uncommon degree in a profession where individualism is not always looked on favorably. That there are such judges, we think, is indisputable. Everyone can intuit the “towering” judges in their own jurisdiction. But this is the first in-depth study of this phenomenon within the field of comparative constitutional law. The term “towering judge” and the questions we pose about these judges are novel. What makes for a towering judge and what are the possible parameters for assessing their “towering-ness”? What are the background conditions that foster or deter the rise of towering judges? Are towering judges, on balance, positive or detrimental for a constitutional system? How do towering judges differ from one country to another and what are the comparative and global effects on towering judges? How do historical and social development relate to this phenomenon, and is it part of “global constitutionalism”? These questions will be at the center of this volume, and are answered by the rich, varied chapters that comprise it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导言:杰出的法官——一个概念和比较分析
本卷是在比较宪法的一个新的主题散文的集合:高耸的法官。本书讨论了来自14个司法管辖区的最高法院和宪法法院的19名法官。在其特定的政治、历史和制度背景下,每一位法官都对宪法的轨迹和发展产生了重大影响。这些法官凌驾于同行之上,在当地乃至全球范围内脱颖而出。其中一些法官成为了知名的公众人物、文化偶像或政治领袖。有些人在国家宪法历史的关键时刻采取行动,或者带领法院走向新的方向。其他人则在不那么令人担忧的时期行事,主要在法律界为人所知。有些人无疑受到尊重和重视,而另一些人则是受到辩论和批评的复杂人物。然而,他们所有人都能够在一个个人主义并不总是被看好的职业中以不同寻常的程度发光。我们认为,有这样的法官是无可争辩的。每个人都可以凭直觉判断自己管辖范围内的“高大”法官。但这是比较宪法学领域对这一现象的首次深入研究。“杰出法官”这个词以及我们对这些法官提出的问题都是新颖的。是什么造就了一个卓越的法官?评估他们“卓越”的可能参数是什么?促进或阻碍杰出法官崛起的背景条件是什么?总的来说,杰出的法官对宪法制度是有利的还是有害的?杰出的法官在不同国家之间有何不同,对杰出法官的比较和全球影响是什么?历史和社会发展如何与这一现象联系起来,它是否是“全球宪政”的一部分?这些问题将在本卷的中心,并回答了丰富的,不同的章节,包括它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction: Towering Judges – A Conceptual and Comparative Analysis Justice Cepeda’s Institution-Building on the Colombian Constitutional Court: A Fusion of the Political and the Legal The Civil Law Tradition, the Pinochet Constitution, and Judge Eugenio Valenzuela Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1