Differences in the Healing of Perineal Wounds in Postpartum Mothers and Hecting Using the Dotted Technique and the Basting Technique

M. Simarmata
{"title":"Differences in the Healing of Perineal Wounds in Postpartum Mothers and Hecting Using the Dotted Technique and the Basting Technique","authors":"M. Simarmata","doi":"10.35335/midwifery.v10i5.953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many factors influence the healing of perineal wounds such as internal, external to the mother and factors from health workers. Healing efforts can be carried out by non-pharmacological methods, namely Kegel exercises, mobilization, herbal concoctions. Healing perineal wounds from the perspective of health workers such as suturing techniques. There are several techniques for sewing perineal wounds, such as interrupted, continuous, subticular. The purpose of this study was to see differences in the healing of perineal wounds in postpartum mothers using the interrupted technique and the subticular technique at the T and BPM D Clinics in Deli Serdang Regency in 2020. The design of this study was an experiment with a longitudinal time approach. Sample: All postpartum women who experienced perineal injuries at the Second Grade clinic at T and BPM D Clinics were 20 people. Results: The average perineal wound healing using the basting technique was faster healing (15.20) than the dotted technique (17.40) . The results of the bivariate analysis stated that there was no significant difference between the healing time of the perineal hecting wound with the dotted technique and basting with a value of p = 0.271 (> 0.005). Health workers should improve their ability to handle episiotomy wounds so that they heal quickly and do not get infected","PeriodicalId":273270,"journal":{"name":"Science Midwifery","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35335/midwifery.v10i5.953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many factors influence the healing of perineal wounds such as internal, external to the mother and factors from health workers. Healing efforts can be carried out by non-pharmacological methods, namely Kegel exercises, mobilization, herbal concoctions. Healing perineal wounds from the perspective of health workers such as suturing techniques. There are several techniques for sewing perineal wounds, such as interrupted, continuous, subticular. The purpose of this study was to see differences in the healing of perineal wounds in postpartum mothers using the interrupted technique and the subticular technique at the T and BPM D Clinics in Deli Serdang Regency in 2020. The design of this study was an experiment with a longitudinal time approach. Sample: All postpartum women who experienced perineal injuries at the Second Grade clinic at T and BPM D Clinics were 20 people. Results: The average perineal wound healing using the basting technique was faster healing (15.20) than the dotted technique (17.40) . The results of the bivariate analysis stated that there was no significant difference between the healing time of the perineal hecting wound with the dotted technique and basting with a value of p = 0.271 (> 0.005). Health workers should improve their ability to handle episiotomy wounds so that they heal quickly and do not get infected
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
点法与涂敷法治疗产后母亲会阴伤口愈合的差异
许多因素影响会阴伤口的愈合,如内部、外部的母亲和来自卫生工作者的因素。治疗工作可以通过非药物方法进行,即凯格尔运动,动员,草药调和。从医护人员的角度探讨会阴伤口的愈合,如缝合技术。会阴伤口的缝合有几种技术,如间断缝合、连续缝合、突下缝合。本研究的目的是观察2020年在Deli Serdang reggency的T和BPM D诊所使用中断技术和耻骨下技术对产后母亲会阴伤口愈合的差异。本研究设计为纵向时间法实验。样本:所有在T和BPM D诊所二级诊所经历会阴损伤的产后妇女为20人。结果:涂敷法会阴创面平均愈合速度(15.20)快于点阵法(17.40)。双变量分析结果显示,点阵法与喷药法治疗会阴创面愈合时间差异无统计学意义,p = 0.271(> 0.005)。卫生工作者应提高处理外阴切开术伤口的能力,使伤口迅速愈合,不受感染
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Utilization mother and child health book on knowledge pregnant women Willingness follow covid-19 vaccination pandemic conditions pregnant women family support Orlistat for obesity management with high levels of TNFα in children The therapeutic effects of ginger extract on gastrointestinal disorders to adults The use of misoprostol as a prevention for post-partum hemorrhage after cesarean ection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1