Ninian Smart as Philosopher of Religion

O. V. Smolenkov
{"title":"Ninian Smart as Philosopher of Religion","authors":"O. V. Smolenkov","doi":"10.26516/2073-3380.2022.41.112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The philosophical conception of British scholar of religion Ninian Smart (1927–2001) is analyzed. Its most significant elements, such as the model of doctrinal schemes, the principle of federalism of worldviews and the methodology of informed empathy are indicated. The philosophy of worldviews, which the author proposed as a replacement for the philosophy of religion to study the totality of significant secular systems of ideas and religions, which are combined by Smart into a single category of worldviews, is outlined. It is stated that the ambiguity of the goals and objectives of such a philosophy, as well as its similarity with religious studies, was criticized. The role of the concept of worldviews and the model of seven dimensions of religion within the framework of Smart's holistic concept, which focuses on the lack of crucial differences between secular and religious worldviews, is indicated. The importance of a dialogue of religions and reflection about the types of religious experience for understanding his research approach is demonstrated. It is concluded that Smart's approach included the following aspects: the principle of methodological agnosticism, support of the pluralism of worldviews, special attention to the transcendent, the development of a global dimension of study worldviews, the rejection of reductionism in the study of religion and its reduction only to theism. It is emphasized that the scholar attempted to streamline the structure of religious discourse and his concept can be considered as some kind of combination of the methodologies of religious studies and philosophy of religion.","PeriodicalId":145879,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Political Science and Religion Studies","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Political Science and Religion Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26516/2073-3380.2022.41.112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The philosophical conception of British scholar of religion Ninian Smart (1927–2001) is analyzed. Its most significant elements, such as the model of doctrinal schemes, the principle of federalism of worldviews and the methodology of informed empathy are indicated. The philosophy of worldviews, which the author proposed as a replacement for the philosophy of religion to study the totality of significant secular systems of ideas and religions, which are combined by Smart into a single category of worldviews, is outlined. It is stated that the ambiguity of the goals and objectives of such a philosophy, as well as its similarity with religious studies, was criticized. The role of the concept of worldviews and the model of seven dimensions of religion within the framework of Smart's holistic concept, which focuses on the lack of crucial differences between secular and religious worldviews, is indicated. The importance of a dialogue of religions and reflection about the types of religious experience for understanding his research approach is demonstrated. It is concluded that Smart's approach included the following aspects: the principle of methodological agnosticism, support of the pluralism of worldviews, special attention to the transcendent, the development of a global dimension of study worldviews, the rejection of reductionism in the study of religion and its reduction only to theism. It is emphasized that the scholar attempted to streamline the structure of religious discourse and his concept can be considered as some kind of combination of the methodologies of religious studies and philosophy of religion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为宗教哲学家的尼尼安·斯玛特
分析了英国宗教学者尼尼安·斯玛特(1927-2001)的哲学观。指出了其最重要的要素,如理论方案模型、世界观的联邦制原则和知情共情的方法。作者提出了世界观哲学,以取代宗教哲学来研究重要的世俗思想和宗教体系的总体,这些体系被斯玛特合并为单一的世界观类别。有人指出,这种哲学的目标和目的的模糊性,以及它与宗教研究的相似性,受到了批评。在斯玛特的整体概念框架内,世界观概念和宗教七个维度模型的作用是指出世俗世界观和宗教世界观之间缺乏关键差异。本文论证了宗教对话和对宗教体验类型的反思对于理解他的研究方法的重要性。斯玛特的研究方法包括以下几个方面:方法论上的不可知论原则、对世界观多元性的支持、对超越性的特别关注、研究世界观的全球维度的发展、在宗教研究中拒绝还原论和将其还原为有神论。强调学者试图精简宗教话语的结构,他的概念可以看作是宗教研究方法与宗教哲学的某种结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Late M. M. Speransky's Intellectual Service to Russia: Between Ideals and Political Reality Criteria of Authenticity as the Methodology for Assessing Historical Reliability of a Gospel Text Towards a Religious Community Towards the Sovereignization of Social Science: Notes in the Margins of an Editorial Ivan the Terrible – the First Publicist and Political Strategist on the Moscow Throne
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1