Characteristics of 1,3-bis-(2-ethoxycarbonylchromon-5-yloxy)-2-((S)- lysyloxy)propane dihydrochloride (N-556), a prodrug for the oral delivery of disodium cromoglycate, in absorption and excretion in rats and rabbits.
A Yoshimi, H Hashizume, M Kitagawa, K Nishimura, N Kakeya
{"title":"Characteristics of 1,3-bis-(2-ethoxycarbonylchromon-5-yloxy)-2-((S)- lysyloxy)propane dihydrochloride (N-556), a prodrug for the oral delivery of disodium cromoglycate, in absorption and excretion in rats and rabbits.","authors":"A Yoshimi, H Hashizume, M Kitagawa, K Nishimura, N Kakeya","doi":"10.1248/bpb1978.15.681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The absorption and excretion of 1,3-bis-(2-ethoxycarbonylchromon-5-yloxy)-2- ((S)-lysyloxy)propane dihydrochloride (N-556), which is a prodrug for the oral delivery of disodium cromoglycate (DSCG), were studied in rats and rabbits. In both animal species, the plasma concentration of DSCG after oral administration of N-556 peaked within 1.0 h, and thereafter declined with a half-life of about 1.2 h in rats and rabbits. The area under the plasma DSCG level versus time curve (AUC) increased in proportion to the dose of N-556 in both animals. The bioavailability of N-556 as calculated from AUC was about 6% in rats and 40% in rabbits, whereas that of DSCG was only 0.1% in rats and 2.5% in rabbits. About 2% and 15% of the dose were respectively excreted as DSCG in the urine and bile after the oral administration of N-556 in rats. The ratio of biliary excretion to urinary excretion (B/U) after the oral administration of N-556 was about twice that after the intravenous injection of DSCG. In rabbits, the urinary and biliary excretions of DSCG after oral administration of N-556 were about 25% and 5%, respectively. The B/U ratio after the oral administration of N-556 in rabbits was similar to that after intravenous administration of DSCG. The difference in the systemic bioavailability of N-556 between rats and rabbits thus appears to be due to a first-pass effect, in addition to a difference in the absorption rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":16743,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacobio-dynamics","volume":"15 12","pages":"681-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1248/bpb1978.15.681","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacobio-dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb1978.15.681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
The absorption and excretion of 1,3-bis-(2-ethoxycarbonylchromon-5-yloxy)-2- ((S)-lysyloxy)propane dihydrochloride (N-556), which is a prodrug for the oral delivery of disodium cromoglycate (DSCG), were studied in rats and rabbits. In both animal species, the plasma concentration of DSCG after oral administration of N-556 peaked within 1.0 h, and thereafter declined with a half-life of about 1.2 h in rats and rabbits. The area under the plasma DSCG level versus time curve (AUC) increased in proportion to the dose of N-556 in both animals. The bioavailability of N-556 as calculated from AUC was about 6% in rats and 40% in rabbits, whereas that of DSCG was only 0.1% in rats and 2.5% in rabbits. About 2% and 15% of the dose were respectively excreted as DSCG in the urine and bile after the oral administration of N-556 in rats. The ratio of biliary excretion to urinary excretion (B/U) after the oral administration of N-556 was about twice that after the intravenous injection of DSCG. In rabbits, the urinary and biliary excretions of DSCG after oral administration of N-556 were about 25% and 5%, respectively. The B/U ratio after the oral administration of N-556 in rabbits was similar to that after intravenous administration of DSCG. The difference in the systemic bioavailability of N-556 between rats and rabbits thus appears to be due to a first-pass effect, in addition to a difference in the absorption rate.