The Validity and Reliability of Six Minute Walk Test in a 15 Meter Track

Nury Nusdwinuringtyas, Kevin Triangto, Idrus Alwi, Faisal Yunus
{"title":"The Validity and Reliability of Six Minute Walk Test in a 15 Meter Track","authors":"Nury Nusdwinuringtyas, Kevin Triangto, Idrus Alwi, Faisal Yunus","doi":"10.36803/ijpmr.v10i02.284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIntroduction: Endurance is one of the key fitness measure that should be evaluated daily. Clinical assessment of endurance in daily practice is usually hurdled by limitation of hospital spaces. Another obstacle arise that shorter six-minute walk test (6MWT) track will lead to more turning motion, yieldingshorter straight walking distance with increased ener gy expenditure.Methods: This cross sectional study compares 6MWT on a 15 meter corridor, to the gold standard Biodex® gait trainer for healthy adults aged 18-50 years. Subjects without any anatomical abnormalities or systemic disorders were recruited, and instructed to turn in a three-step method at track ends tomaximize walking distance. Furthermore, validity and reliability assessments to obtain both Pearson correlation and Cronbach Alpha values were performed respectively.Results: Among 123 subjects, 58 males aged ranging from 18 to 45 years, and females between 18 to 42 years were recruited. Anthropometrical values were similar between gender. Significant difference in walking distance and walking speed was observed. Comparison of walking distance between the twomodalities were seen to be statistically similar (p=0.693). Pearson validity test was proven significant (p<0.001) with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.998, while reliability test obtained Cronbach’s Alpha value of 0.999, hence showing that these are both valid and reliable.Conclusion: Good validity and reliability of 6MWT in 15 meter track as compared to the gold standard Biodex® gait trainer was demonstrated in this study. Moreover, shorter track is a potential modification adhering to the limitation of operational space. The three-step turning method could significantlyimproves total walk distance, and thus is suggested.Keywords: six-minute walk test, walk distance, walking speed","PeriodicalId":247519,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36803/ijpmr.v10i02.284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACTIntroduction: Endurance is one of the key fitness measure that should be evaluated daily. Clinical assessment of endurance in daily practice is usually hurdled by limitation of hospital spaces. Another obstacle arise that shorter six-minute walk test (6MWT) track will lead to more turning motion, yieldingshorter straight walking distance with increased ener gy expenditure.Methods: This cross sectional study compares 6MWT on a 15 meter corridor, to the gold standard Biodex® gait trainer for healthy adults aged 18-50 years. Subjects without any anatomical abnormalities or systemic disorders were recruited, and instructed to turn in a three-step method at track ends tomaximize walking distance. Furthermore, validity and reliability assessments to obtain both Pearson correlation and Cronbach Alpha values were performed respectively.Results: Among 123 subjects, 58 males aged ranging from 18 to 45 years, and females between 18 to 42 years were recruited. Anthropometrical values were similar between gender. Significant difference in walking distance and walking speed was observed. Comparison of walking distance between the twomodalities were seen to be statistically similar (p=0.693). Pearson validity test was proven significant (p<0.001) with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.998, while reliability test obtained Cronbach’s Alpha value of 0.999, hence showing that these are both valid and reliable.Conclusion: Good validity and reliability of 6MWT in 15 meter track as compared to the gold standard Biodex® gait trainer was demonstrated in this study. Moreover, shorter track is a potential modification adhering to the limitation of operational space. The three-step turning method could significantlyimproves total walk distance, and thus is suggested.Keywords: six-minute walk test, walk distance, walking speed
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
15米轨道六分钟步行测试的效度和信度
【摘要】简介:耐力是日常锻炼的重要健身指标之一。临床评估耐力在日常实践中通常是障碍的医院空间的限制。另一个障碍是,较短的6分钟步行测试(6MWT)轨道将导致更多的转弯运动,从而产生较短的直线步行距离和增加的能量消耗。方法:这项横断面研究比较了6MWT在15米走廊上与黄金标准Biodex®步态训练器在18-50岁健康成年人中的应用。招募没有任何解剖异常或全身性疾病的受试者,并指示他们在轨道末端转三步法以最大化步行距离。此外,分别进行了效度和信度评估,以获得Pearson相关和Cronbach Alpha值。结果:123名受试者中,男性58名,年龄18 ~ 45岁,女性18 ~ 42岁。不同性别的人体测量值相似。步行距离和步行速度有显著性差异。两种模态的步行距离比较具有统计学上的相似性(p=0.693)。Pearson效度检验p<0.001,相关系数r = 0.998,信度检验Cronbach’s Alpha值为0.999,证明两者均有效可靠。结论:与金标准Biodex®步态训练器相比,本研究证明了6MWT在15米跑道上具有良好的效度和信度。此外,缩短轨道是一种潜在的修改,坚持操作空间的限制。三步转弯法能显著提高步行总距离,建议采用三步转弯法。关键词:六分钟步行测试,步行距离,步行速度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disability Self-evaluation for Low Back Pain in COVID-19 Pandemic Effects of Additional Radial Shockwave Therapy to Median Nerve Gliding Exercises on Hand Grip Strength in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Patients The Validity and Reliability of Six Minute Walk Test in a 15 Meter Track Postural Control and Functional Performance Changes with Inspiratory Muscle Training in Chronic Kidney Disease Patient Disability in post Covid-19 Era
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1