Actores de la política de calidad en la educación superior costarricense

Eugenia Gallardo-Allen
{"title":"Actores de la política de calidad en la educación superior costarricense","authors":"Eugenia Gallardo-Allen","doi":"10.22191/gobernar/vol3/iss4/6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes the process of formulation and adoption of accreditation as a component of the higher education quality policy in Costa Rica. This is done from a neoinstitutionalist approach, using the Scharpf (1997) model. Public universities are identified as promoters and directive actors, while private universities are regarded as allied actors. Some international organizations and the government are also key actors in the formulation and adoption process. The adoption of the public interest nature of the National System of Accreditation of Higher Education (Sinaes) is carried out via Law N°8256 of the Republic. The belief and perception of the actors fundamentally lies in considering that the quality of higher education is affected by the massification and proliferation of private universities, as well as the ideas of international organizations that propose as an alternative solution the creation of national education systems accreditation and use evaluation tools to ensure quality. To carry out the analysis, it used discourse analysis, in official documents from Conare and the University of Costa Rica are used, as well as articles from the newspaper La Nación. Recepción: abril 8 de 2019 | Modificación: mayo 17 de 2019 | Aprobación: mayo 1 de 2019 DOI: 10.22191/gobernar/vol3/iss4/6  Universidad de Costa Rica. Correo electrónico: eugenia.gallardo@ucr.ac.cr","PeriodicalId":217747,"journal":{"name":"Gobernar: The Journal of Latin American Public Policy and Governance","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gobernar: The Journal of Latin American Public Policy and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22191/gobernar/vol3/iss4/6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyzes the process of formulation and adoption of accreditation as a component of the higher education quality policy in Costa Rica. This is done from a neoinstitutionalist approach, using the Scharpf (1997) model. Public universities are identified as promoters and directive actors, while private universities are regarded as allied actors. Some international organizations and the government are also key actors in the formulation and adoption process. The adoption of the public interest nature of the National System of Accreditation of Higher Education (Sinaes) is carried out via Law N°8256 of the Republic. The belief and perception of the actors fundamentally lies in considering that the quality of higher education is affected by the massification and proliferation of private universities, as well as the ideas of international organizations that propose as an alternative solution the creation of national education systems accreditation and use evaluation tools to ensure quality. To carry out the analysis, it used discourse analysis, in official documents from Conare and the University of Costa Rica are used, as well as articles from the newspaper La Nación. Recepción: abril 8 de 2019 | Modificación: mayo 17 de 2019 | Aprobación: mayo 1 de 2019 DOI: 10.22191/gobernar/vol3/iss4/6  Universidad de Costa Rica. Correo electrónico: eugenia.gallardo@ucr.ac.cr
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哥斯达黎加高等教育质量政策的行动者
本文分析了认证作为哥斯达黎加高等教育质量政策组成部分的制定和采用过程。这是从一种新制度主义方法,使用Scharpf(1997)模型来完成的。公立大学被认为是促进者和指导者,而私立大学则被认为是联盟行动者。一些国际组织和政府在制定和通过过程中也发挥了关键作用。通过共和国第8256号法律,确立了国家高等教育认证体系(Sinaes)的公共利益性质。行为者的信念和看法从根本上在于考虑到高等教育的质量受到私立大学的大规模和扩散的影响,以及国际组织提出的建立国家教育系统认证和使用评估工具来确保质量的替代解决方案的想法。为了进行分析,它使用了话语分析,在Conare和哥斯达黎加大学的官方文件中使用,以及La Nación报纸的文章。Recepción: abril 8 de 2019 | Modificación: mayo 17 de 2019 | Aprobación: mayo 1 de 2019 DOI: 10.22191/ goberner /vol3/iss4/6或哥斯达黎加大学。Correo electrónico: eugenia.gallardo@ucr.ac.cr
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Las fundaciones empresariales y la agendación de políticas públicas mediante la gestión de redes de actores: el caso de NiñezYA en Colombia La lucha por el liderazgo adecuado en las organizaciones de los movimientos sociales: reflexión colectiva y reglas como base para la autonomía Bipolaridad de las políticas de movilidad del Valle de Aburrá: análisis desde los instrumentos de gestión de la demanda implementados entre 1999 y 2019 La administración pública desde la perspectiva de la prevención de atrocidades en las respuestas a la COVID-19: Aprovechar la pandemia para lograr mayor equidad social La formación y capacitación de cuadros políticos para la gestión del Estado en Argentina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1