A Systematic Review of Knowledge Visualization Approaches Using Big Data Methodology for Clinical Decision Support

Mehrdad Roham, Anait R. Gabrielyan, N. Archer
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Knowledge Visualization Approaches Using Big Data Methodology for Clinical Decision Support","authors":"Mehrdad Roham, Anait R. Gabrielyan, N. Archer","doi":"10.5772/intechopen.90266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter reports on results from a systematic review of peer-reviewed studies related to big data knowledge visualization for clinical decision support (CDS). The aims were to identify and synthesize sources of big data in knowledge visualization, identify visualization interactivity approaches for CDS, and summarize outcomes. Searches were conducted via PubMed, Embase, Ebscohost, CINAHL, Medline, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore in April 2019, using search terms representing concepts of: big data, knowledge visualization, and clinical decision support. A Google Scholar gray literature search was also conducted. All references were screened for eligibility. Our review returned 3252 references, with 17 studies remaining after screening. Data were extracted and coded from these studies and analyzed using a PICOS framework. The most common audience intended for the studies was healthcare providers (n = 16); the most common source of big data was electronic health records (EHRs) (n = 12), followed by microbiology/pathology laboratory data (n = 8). The most common intervention type was some form of analysis platform/tool (n = 7). We identified and classified studies by visualization type, user intent, big data platforms and tools used, big data analytics methods, and outcomes from big data knowledge visualization of CDS applications.","PeriodicalId":128629,"journal":{"name":"Recent Advances in Digital System Diagnosis and Management of Healthcare","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recent Advances in Digital System Diagnosis and Management of Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This chapter reports on results from a systematic review of peer-reviewed studies related to big data knowledge visualization for clinical decision support (CDS). The aims were to identify and synthesize sources of big data in knowledge visualization, identify visualization interactivity approaches for CDS, and summarize outcomes. Searches were conducted via PubMed, Embase, Ebscohost, CINAHL, Medline, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore in April 2019, using search terms representing concepts of: big data, knowledge visualization, and clinical decision support. A Google Scholar gray literature search was also conducted. All references were screened for eligibility. Our review returned 3252 references, with 17 studies remaining after screening. Data were extracted and coded from these studies and analyzed using a PICOS framework. The most common audience intended for the studies was healthcare providers (n = 16); the most common source of big data was electronic health records (EHRs) (n = 12), followed by microbiology/pathology laboratory data (n = 8). The most common intervention type was some form of analysis platform/tool (n = 7). We identified and classified studies by visualization type, user intent, big data platforms and tools used, big data analytics methods, and outcomes from big data knowledge visualization of CDS applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运用大数据方法进行临床决策支持的知识可视化方法系统综述
本章报告了与临床决策支持(CDS)的大数据知识可视化相关的同行评议研究的系统综述结果。目的是识别和综合知识可视化中的大数据来源,确定CDS的可视化交互方法,并总结结果。检索于2019年4月通过PubMed、Embase、Ebscohost、CINAHL、Medline、Web of Science和IEEE explore进行,检索词代表的概念是:大数据、知识可视化和临床决策支持。还进行了Google Scholar灰色文献检索。所有参考文献均经过筛选。我们的综述返回了3252篇文献,筛选后剩下17篇研究。从这些研究中提取和编码数据,并使用PICOS框架进行分析。这些研究最常见的受众是医疗保健提供者(n = 16);最常见的大数据来源是电子健康记录(ehr) (n = 12),其次是微生物学/病理学实验室数据(n = 8)。最常见的干预类型是某种形式的分析平台/工具(n = 7)。我们根据可视化类型、用户意图、使用的大数据平台和工具、大数据分析方法以及CDS应用的大数据知识可视化结果对研究进行了识别和分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Primary Health-Care Service Delivery and Accessibility in the Digital Age Owning Attention: Applying Human Factors Principles to Support Clinical Decision Support WASPSS: A Clinical Decision Support System for Antimicrobial Stewardship Telemedicine Network in Pediatric Cardiology: The Case of Tuscany Region in Italy A Systematic Review of Knowledge Visualization Approaches Using Big Data Methodology for Clinical Decision Support
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1