Human brain tractography: A DTI vs DKI comparison analysis

R. Loução, R. Nunes, Rafael Neto-Henriques, M. Correia, H. Ferreira
{"title":"Human brain tractography: A DTI vs DKI comparison analysis","authors":"R. Loução, R. Nunes, Rafael Neto-Henriques, M. Correia, H. Ferreira","doi":"10.1109/ENBENG.2015.7088820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Water diffusion can be measured using Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI). This technique estimates molecular diffusion using a Gaussian model which can account for anisotropy arising, for example, from the presence of myelin sheath. The main direction of diffusion can also be estimated from DTI and used to compute diffusion tracts (tractography), a good tool to analyse the structure of white matter brain pathways. Nevertheless, DTI has limitations, such as ignoring the non-Gaussian properties of biological tissues and the inability to resolve intra-voxel fibre crossings that may lead to the reconstruction of anatomically inaccurate tracts. Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging (DKI) was introduced to ameliorate these problems. By abandoning the Gaussian model, DKI acts as an extension of DTI, allowing the computation of the same scalar parameters as DTI as well as providing measures of tissue heterogeneity and resolving multiple tracts within each voxel[1]. The purpose of this study is to analyse the DKI performance in tractography comparing to the DTI approach. DKI data was acquired from 3 subjects (1 male, mean age: 39±14 years) using Philips Achieva® 3.0T including diffusion weighted (DW) Single Shot Echo Planar images using 64 directions with b-values 0, 1000 and 2000 s/mm2, reconstruction matrix 256×256, slice thickness 1.5 mm, TE/TR 64/7703 ms, FOV 240×240 mm2, 60 slices. DTI data was extracted from DKI considering only b-values 0 and 1000. All DTI and DKI based tracts were computed using DKIu, a Matlab toolbox created by Neto-Henriques et. al., using three different tractography approaches: DTI, Laz-DKI[2] and KT-DKI[1]. The structures considered were the Internal Capsule (IC) and the Corpus Callosum (CC). Using TrackVis for visualisation, DKI tractography was shown to enable improved fibre crossing resolutio n (Figure 1), consistent in all three subjects. The number of streamlines computed in the CC was higher with the DKI approach than with DTI, but lower in the IC. DKI-based tractography appears to successfully address some of the limitations of DTI, as it resolves crossing fibres, providing more useful information regarding the brain's microstructure. This is particularly important in pre-surgical planning and in identifying brain lesions and pathologies.","PeriodicalId":285567,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 4th Portuguese Meeting on Bioengineering (ENBENG)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE 4th Portuguese Meeting on Bioengineering (ENBENG)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ENBENG.2015.7088820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Water diffusion can be measured using Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI). This technique estimates molecular diffusion using a Gaussian model which can account for anisotropy arising, for example, from the presence of myelin sheath. The main direction of diffusion can also be estimated from DTI and used to compute diffusion tracts (tractography), a good tool to analyse the structure of white matter brain pathways. Nevertheless, DTI has limitations, such as ignoring the non-Gaussian properties of biological tissues and the inability to resolve intra-voxel fibre crossings that may lead to the reconstruction of anatomically inaccurate tracts. Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging (DKI) was introduced to ameliorate these problems. By abandoning the Gaussian model, DKI acts as an extension of DTI, allowing the computation of the same scalar parameters as DTI as well as providing measures of tissue heterogeneity and resolving multiple tracts within each voxel[1]. The purpose of this study is to analyse the DKI performance in tractography comparing to the DTI approach. DKI data was acquired from 3 subjects (1 male, mean age: 39±14 years) using Philips Achieva® 3.0T including diffusion weighted (DW) Single Shot Echo Planar images using 64 directions with b-values 0, 1000 and 2000 s/mm2, reconstruction matrix 256×256, slice thickness 1.5 mm, TE/TR 64/7703 ms, FOV 240×240 mm2, 60 slices. DTI data was extracted from DKI considering only b-values 0 and 1000. All DTI and DKI based tracts were computed using DKIu, a Matlab toolbox created by Neto-Henriques et. al., using three different tractography approaches: DTI, Laz-DKI[2] and KT-DKI[1]. The structures considered were the Internal Capsule (IC) and the Corpus Callosum (CC). Using TrackVis for visualisation, DKI tractography was shown to enable improved fibre crossing resolutio n (Figure 1), consistent in all three subjects. The number of streamlines computed in the CC was higher with the DKI approach than with DTI, but lower in the IC. DKI-based tractography appears to successfully address some of the limitations of DTI, as it resolves crossing fibres, providing more useful information regarding the brain's microstructure. This is particularly important in pre-surgical planning and in identifying brain lesions and pathologies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人脑束图:DTI与DKI的比较分析
水的扩散可以用扩散张量成像(DTI)来测量。这种技术使用高斯模型来估计分子扩散,这种模型可以解释各向异性的产生,例如,髓鞘的存在。扩散的主要方向也可以从DTI估计,并用于计算扩散束(束图),一个很好的工具,分析白质脑通路的结构。然而,DTI也有局限性,比如忽略了生物组织的非高斯特性,无法解决体素内纤维交叉,这可能导致解剖学上不准确的束重建。扩散峰度成像(DKI)的引入改善了这些问题。通过放弃高斯模型,DKI作为DTI的扩展,允许计算与DTI相同的标量参数,并提供组织异质性的度量和解决每个体素内的多个域[1]。本研究的目的是分析DKI在牵道造影中的表现与DTI方法的比较。DKI数据来自3名受试者(1名男性,平均年龄39±14岁),使用Philips Achieva®3.0T包括64个方向的扩散加权(DW)单次回波平面图像,b值分别为0、1000和2000 s/mm2,重建矩阵256×256,切片厚度1.5 mm, TE/TR 64/7703 ms,视场240×240 mm2, 60片。DTI数据从DKI中提取,仅考虑b值0和1000。使用Neto-Henriques等人创建的Matlab工具箱DKIu计算所有基于DTI和DKI的束,使用三种不同的束道成像方法:DTI、Laz-DKI[2]和KT-DKI[1]。考虑的结构是内囊(IC)和胼胝体(CC)。使用TrackVis进行可视化,DKI牵束成像显示可以提高纤维交叉分辨率n(图1),这在所有三个受试者中都是一致的。DKI方法在CC中计算的流线数量比DTI方法高,但在IC中较低。基于DKI的束束造影似乎成功地解决了DTI的一些局限性,因为它解决了交叉纤维,提供了更多关于大脑微观结构的有用信息。这在术前计划和识别脑部病变和病理方面尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PLGA nanoparticles for calcitriol delivery Simplified multibody model for dynamic loading analysis of the lumbar human spine Hand therapist: A rehabilitation approach based on wearable technology and video gaming A medical device for support of the ankle pathologies diagnosis Spatial monitoring of temperature estimation during ultrasound heating therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1