Evaluation of filter function for volume PET imaging using the 3DRP algorithm

H. Baghaei, W. Wong, Hongdi Li, J. Uribe, Yu Wang, M. Aykaç, Yaqiang Liu, T. Xing
{"title":"Evaluation of filter function for volume PET imaging using the 3DRP algorithm","authors":"H. Baghaei, W. Wong, Hongdi Li, J. Uribe, Yu Wang, M. Aykaç, Yaqiang Liu, T. Xing","doi":"10.1109/NSSMIC.2001.1008691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have investigated the influence of filter and its cutoff frequency on the image quality for volume PET imaging using the widely used 3D-reprojection (3DRP) algorithm. An important parameter in 3DRP and other filtered backprojection algorithms is the choice of the filter window function. For this work, three different low-pass filter window functions, Hann, Hamming and Butterworth, were investigated. For each filter a range of cutoff frequencies were considered. Projection data were acquired by scanning a uniform cylindrical phantom, a cylindrical phantom with four small lesions and the Hoffman brain phantom. All measurements were performed with the high-resolution PET camera developed at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDAPET). This prototype camera, which is a multiring scanner with no septa, has a transaxial resolution of 2.8 mm. The evaluation was performed by computing the noise level of reconstructed images of the uniform phantom, the contrast recovery of the hot lesions in warm background, and by visual inspection of image quality for the Hoffman brain phantom. For the high statistics data presented here, a cutoff frequency 0.6 to 0.8 of Nyquist resulted in a reasonable compromise between the contrast recovery and the noise level for the Hann filter. For the Butterworth filter, a cutoff at 0.4-0.6 of Nyquist frequency was a reasonable choice. Overall, the Butterworth filter performed better in contrast recovery and spatial resolution at the cost of somewhat noisier image.","PeriodicalId":159123,"journal":{"name":"2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2001.1008691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We have investigated the influence of filter and its cutoff frequency on the image quality for volume PET imaging using the widely used 3D-reprojection (3DRP) algorithm. An important parameter in 3DRP and other filtered backprojection algorithms is the choice of the filter window function. For this work, three different low-pass filter window functions, Hann, Hamming and Butterworth, were investigated. For each filter a range of cutoff frequencies were considered. Projection data were acquired by scanning a uniform cylindrical phantom, a cylindrical phantom with four small lesions and the Hoffman brain phantom. All measurements were performed with the high-resolution PET camera developed at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDAPET). This prototype camera, which is a multiring scanner with no septa, has a transaxial resolution of 2.8 mm. The evaluation was performed by computing the noise level of reconstructed images of the uniform phantom, the contrast recovery of the hot lesions in warm background, and by visual inspection of image quality for the Hoffman brain phantom. For the high statistics data presented here, a cutoff frequency 0.6 to 0.8 of Nyquist resulted in a reasonable compromise between the contrast recovery and the noise level for the Hann filter. For the Butterworth filter, a cutoff at 0.4-0.6 of Nyquist frequency was a reasonable choice. Overall, the Butterworth filter performed better in contrast recovery and spatial resolution at the cost of somewhat noisier image.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用3DRP算法评估体积PET成像的滤波功能
我们研究了使用广泛使用的3d重投影(3DRP)算法进行体积PET成像时,滤波器及其截止频率对图像质量的影响。在3DRP和其他滤波反投影算法中,滤波窗函数的选择是一个重要的参数。在这项工作中,研究了三种不同的低通滤波器窗函数,Hann, Hamming和Butterworth。对于每个滤波器,考虑一个截止频率范围。投影数据是通过扫描一个均匀的圆柱形幻像,一个有四个小病灶的圆柱形幻像和霍夫曼脑幻像来获得的。所有测量均使用MD安德森癌症中心(MDAPET)开发的高分辨率PET相机进行。这个原型相机是一个没有间隔的多环扫描仪,其跨轴分辨率为2.8毫米。通过计算均匀脑假体重建图像的噪声水平、热病灶在暖背景下的对比度恢复以及霍夫曼脑假体图像质量的目视检测来进行评估。对于这里给出的高统计数据,奈奎斯特的0.6到0.8的截止频率导致汉恩滤波器的对比度恢复和噪声水平之间的合理折衷。对于巴特沃斯滤波器,奈奎斯特频率的0.4-0.6的截止是一个合理的选择。总的来说,巴特沃斯滤波器在对比度恢复和空间分辨率方面表现较好,但代价是图像有一定的噪声。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of IEC and IEEE standards for computer-based control systems important to safety Helicity-correlated systematics for SLAC Experiment E158 Achievements of the ASTRO-E Hard X-ray Detector development Inexpensive position sensitive detector block for 40 mm diameter PMT using quadrant sharing configuration A /sup 252/Cf neutron irradiator for testing electronic components for the Large Hadron Collider
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1