{"title":"Il Dante di De Sanctis è ancora attuale","authors":"Paolo Orvieto","doi":"10.13128/LEA-1824-484X-22353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"My aim is to show the contemporary relevance of the work of Francesco De Sanctis, which has been intensively researched, but is now relegated to our past. However, his Dante, in contrast with his Petrarch, has timeless ethical, ideological and political qualities, while his Petrarch is still a negative example of the past and present defects of Italian. De Sanctis is still relevant in the sense that, with Dante, he favours a culture and language for ordinary people, an antidote to the diglossic situation of a ‘high’ language not only in the Renaissance but also that of the avant-garde and the technicalities of critical language. Last, but not least, the human example represented by Dante is a stronghold against the spread of what the Anglo-Polish anthropologist Bauman calls the man of “liquid modernity”.","PeriodicalId":340115,"journal":{"name":"LEA : Lingue e Letterature d'Oriente e d'Occidente","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LEA : Lingue e Letterature d'Oriente e d'Occidente","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13128/LEA-1824-484X-22353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
My aim is to show the contemporary relevance of the work of Francesco De Sanctis, which has been intensively researched, but is now relegated to our past. However, his Dante, in contrast with his Petrarch, has timeless ethical, ideological and political qualities, while his Petrarch is still a negative example of the past and present defects of Italian. De Sanctis is still relevant in the sense that, with Dante, he favours a culture and language for ordinary people, an antidote to the diglossic situation of a ‘high’ language not only in the Renaissance but also that of the avant-garde and the technicalities of critical language. Last, but not least, the human example represented by Dante is a stronghold against the spread of what the Anglo-Polish anthropologist Bauman calls the man of “liquid modernity”.
我的目的是展示弗朗西斯科·德·桑科斯(Francesco De Sanctis)作品的当代相关性,这些作品已经得到了深入的研究,但现在已经成为我们的过去。然而,他的但丁与他的彼特拉克相比,具有永恒的伦理、思想和政治品质,而他的彼特拉克仍然是意大利过去和现在缺陷的反面例子。从某种意义上讲,德·桑科蒂斯仍然是相关的,但丁,他支持一种普通人的文化和语言,一种解毒剂,不仅在文艺复兴时期,而且在先锋派和批评语言的技术细节中,一种“高级”语言的对话情境。最后,但并非最不重要的是,以但丁为代表的人类榜样是反对盎格鲁-波兰人类学家鲍曼所说的“流动的现代性”传播的堡垒。