Highly-sensitive chimerism analysis in blood after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in childhood leukemia: Results from the Nordic Microchimerism Study

A. K. Haugaard, H. Madsen, T. Masmas, K. Vettenranta, J. Buechner, K. Mellgren, D. Turkiewicz, S. Rosthøj, H. Marquart, C. Heilmann, Klaus Gottlob Müller, M. Ifversen
{"title":"Highly-sensitive chimerism analysis in blood after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in childhood leukemia: Results from the Nordic Microchimerism Study","authors":"A. K. Haugaard, H. Madsen, T. Masmas, K. Vettenranta, J. Buechner, K. Mellgren, D. Turkiewicz, S. Rosthøj, H. Marquart, C. Heilmann, Klaus Gottlob Müller, M. Ifversen","doi":"10.3389/frhem.2023.1055484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analysis of chimerism in blood post‐HCT using STR‐PCR is routinely applied in parallel with quantification of MRD to predict relapse of leukemia. Real time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR) chimerism is 10‐ to 100‐fold more sensitive, but clinical studies in children are sparse. In a prospective multicenter study, we analyzed increasing mixed chimerism (IMC) in blood samples following transplantation for leukemia in 64 children. IMC was defined as a minimum increase of either 0.1% or 0.05% recipient DNA between two samples or a ≥10-fold increase. Samples closer than 30 days to diagnosis of relapse were omitted. The risk of relapse was higher in children with IMC of both 0.1% and 0.05% compared to children without IMC (27.8 (95% CI 4.4-175.8; P<.001), and 18.4 (95% CI 2.8-120.5; P=0.002), respectively). From the date of IMC, the 3-year CI of relapse or MRD-positivity was 26.7% (CI 9.4-47.0) and 18.5% (6.4-35.3) for IMC ≥ 0.1% (n=27) and ≥ 0.05% (n= 40), respectively. In the subset of children without an IMC ≥ 0.1% or ≥ 0.05%, CI of relapse or molecular relapse were 16.7% (5.0 -34.1) and 10.8% (3.4 -23.3), respectively. In all cases with a relapse undetectable by IMC, MRD remained undetectable prior to relapse and standard chimerism negative. In a landmark analysis, neither an IMC ≥ 0.1% nor ≥ 0.05% prior to 90 days post‐HCT was significantly associated with an increased relapse incidence. These results indicate that the serial monitoring of RQ‐PCR chimerism in peripheral blood post-HCT may be a valuable supplement to the minimal residual disease analysis for an early detection of relapse in acute childhood leukemia.","PeriodicalId":101407,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in hematology","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhem.2023.1055484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Analysis of chimerism in blood post‐HCT using STR‐PCR is routinely applied in parallel with quantification of MRD to predict relapse of leukemia. Real time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR) chimerism is 10‐ to 100‐fold more sensitive, but clinical studies in children are sparse. In a prospective multicenter study, we analyzed increasing mixed chimerism (IMC) in blood samples following transplantation for leukemia in 64 children. IMC was defined as a minimum increase of either 0.1% or 0.05% recipient DNA between two samples or a ≥10-fold increase. Samples closer than 30 days to diagnosis of relapse were omitted. The risk of relapse was higher in children with IMC of both 0.1% and 0.05% compared to children without IMC (27.8 (95% CI 4.4-175.8; P<.001), and 18.4 (95% CI 2.8-120.5; P=0.002), respectively). From the date of IMC, the 3-year CI of relapse or MRD-positivity was 26.7% (CI 9.4-47.0) and 18.5% (6.4-35.3) for IMC ≥ 0.1% (n=27) and ≥ 0.05% (n= 40), respectively. In the subset of children without an IMC ≥ 0.1% or ≥ 0.05%, CI of relapse or molecular relapse were 16.7% (5.0 -34.1) and 10.8% (3.4 -23.3), respectively. In all cases with a relapse undetectable by IMC, MRD remained undetectable prior to relapse and standard chimerism negative. In a landmark analysis, neither an IMC ≥ 0.1% nor ≥ 0.05% prior to 90 days post‐HCT was significantly associated with an increased relapse incidence. These results indicate that the serial monitoring of RQ‐PCR chimerism in peripheral blood post-HCT may be a valuable supplement to the minimal residual disease analysis for an early detection of relapse in acute childhood leukemia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童白血病异体造血细胞移植后血液中高度敏感的嵌合分析:来自北欧微嵌合研究的结果
利用STR - PCR分析HCT后血液中的嵌合现象通常与定量MRD同时应用,以预测白血病的复发。实时定量PCR (RQ-PCR)嵌合的灵敏度要高10 - 100倍,但在儿童中的临床研究很少。在一项前瞻性多中心研究中,我们分析了64名儿童白血病移植后血液样本中混合嵌合(IMC)的增加。IMC定义为两个样本之间受体DNA最小增加0.1%或0.05%或增加≥10倍。离诊断复发时间小于30天的样本被省略。与无IMC的儿童相比,IMC患儿的复发风险分别为0.1%和0.05% (27.8)(95% CI 4.4-175.8;P< 0.001), 18.4 (95% CI 2.8 ~ 120.5;P = 0.002),分别)。自IMC发生之日起,IMC≥0.1% (n=27)和≥0.05% (n= 40)的3年复发或mrd阳性CI分别为26.7% (CI 9.4-47.0)和18.5% (CI 6.4-35.3)。在没有IMC≥0.1%或≥0.05%的儿童亚群中,复发或分子复发的CI分别为16.7%(5.0 -34.1)和10.8%(3.4 -23.3)。在所有IMC检测不到的复发病例中,MRD在复发前仍然检测不到,标准嵌合阴性。在一项里程碑式分析中,HCT后90天前IMC≥0.1%或≥0.05%与复发率增加均无显著相关性。这些结果表明,对hct后外周血RQ‐PCR嵌合的连续监测可能是对早期发现急性儿童白血病复发的最小残留疾病分析的有价值的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of biosimilar pegfilgrastim in patients with lymphoma after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation: a real-life study Targeting the bone marrow niche, moving towards leukemia eradication First clinical experience of isatuximab safety and tolerability in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: real-world data from a compassionate use program in Germany Morphological, clinical, and molecular profiling of post-polycythemia vera accelerated/blast phase occurring with and without antecedent secondary myelofibrosis Evaluating the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in adults with sickle cell disease during the Omicron period of COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1