THE ANALYZING OF AMBIGUITY ON STUDENTS’ WRITING MADE BY STUDENTS IN SMK DHARMA BAKTI MEDAN

Elya Batu Baren, F. Y. Ginting, K. Tarigan
{"title":"THE ANALYZING OF AMBIGUITY ON STUDENTS’ WRITING MADE BY STUDENTS IN SMK DHARMA BAKTI MEDAN","authors":"Elya Batu Baren, F. Y. Ginting, K. Tarigan","doi":"10.54367/kairos.v4i3.1148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aims of this study were to figure out the casual factors of ambiguity found in students writing. The subject of this study was the students of Class XI-TKR of SMK Dharma Bakti Medan. The research design was in the form of descriptive qualitative research. The instrument of collecting data was the students’ sheet of English writing text. In conclusion, the most dominant ambiguity in lexical meaning found in writing text by Class XI-TKR of SMK Dharma Bakti Medan was polysemy ambiguity. There were 10 casual factors of why ambiguity found in students’ writing text based on the analysis of the structure of sentence in students’ English writing. The most reasons were: (1) the students did not give the specific details in their writing, usually they preferred the short writing, (2) there were several vocabularies which could be reasonably interpreted more than one way or reasonably interpreted  more  than  one  thing,  (3)  the  students  felt  confused  to  find  appropriate vocabularies to express the meaning. As a result, they sometimes left the sentence undone or hanged without a clear idea, due to the lack of vocabularies. The analysis of ambiguity in lexical  meaning  that  made by  students  of Class  XI-TKR  of SMK  Dharma  Bakti  Medan revealed  that  students  should  learn  semantic  as  the  main  subject  in  English  writing  to understand multiplicity of meanings.","PeriodicalId":184113,"journal":{"name":"Kairos English Language Teaching Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kairos English Language Teaching Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54367/kairos.v4i3.1148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aims of this study were to figure out the casual factors of ambiguity found in students writing. The subject of this study was the students of Class XI-TKR of SMK Dharma Bakti Medan. The research design was in the form of descriptive qualitative research. The instrument of collecting data was the students’ sheet of English writing text. In conclusion, the most dominant ambiguity in lexical meaning found in writing text by Class XI-TKR of SMK Dharma Bakti Medan was polysemy ambiguity. There were 10 casual factors of why ambiguity found in students’ writing text based on the analysis of the structure of sentence in students’ English writing. The most reasons were: (1) the students did not give the specific details in their writing, usually they preferred the short writing, (2) there were several vocabularies which could be reasonably interpreted more than one way or reasonably interpreted  more  than  one  thing,  (3)  the  students  felt  confused  to  find  appropriate vocabularies to express the meaning. As a result, they sometimes left the sentence undone or hanged without a clear idea, due to the lack of vocabularies. The analysis of ambiguity in lexical  meaning  that  made by  students  of Class  XI-TKR  of SMK  Dharma  Bakti  Medan revealed  that  students  should  learn  semantic  as  the  main  subject  in  English  writing  to understand multiplicity of meanings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生在SMK《达摩》中所作的学生€™写作歧义分析
本研究的目的是找出学生写作中歧义的偶然因素。研究设计采用描述性定性研究的形式。收集数据的工具是学生的英语写作文本€™页。通过对学生英语写作中句子结构的分析,得出了学生写作中出现歧义的10个偶然因素。最主要的原因是:(1)学生在写作中没有给出具体的细节,通常他们更喜欢简短的写作;(2)有几个词汇可以合理地解释不止一种方式或合理地interpreted more than oneÂ事情, (3) the students felt confused to findÂ合适的词汇来表达意思。结果,由于词汇量的缺乏,他们有时会把句子留到最后,或者没有明确的想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Analysis of Oral Variety in Medan City THE IMPLEMENTATION OF AUDIO VISUAL MEDIA TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ SKILL IN WRITING RECOUNT TEXTS TO THE NINTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP SWASTA PABA BINJAI IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2020/2021 THE APPLICATION OF CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS THE CASE OF LEARNING LATIN LANGUAGE ANALYZING STUDENTS’ ERRORS IN WRITING COMPOSITION. A THESIS. TEACHERS TRAINING AND EDUCATION FACULTY. CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF SAINT THOMAS. APPLYING PEER TEACHING TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ GRAMMAR ACHIEVEMENT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1