{"title":"Site-Specific Installation Art in Historical Perspective","authors":"T. Scholte","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv25wxbgr.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The argument in this chapter starts with a discussion of the art historical\n discourse on site-specific installation art. Artists as well as critics have\n explored various notions of site specificity, usually in concordance with\n successive art historical periods: the first “wave” of site-specific installations\n created during the late 1960s and early 1970s, and a second period, from the\n 1980s and early 1990s until today. The chapter elucidates several art historical\n perspectives on both periods and the shifts occurring in the relationship\n between artists and museum institutions, between the artwork and the\n site. Furthermore, it is important to realize that site-specific installation\n artworks are highly diverse in form, content, and meaning. For the current\n purpose of developing a model with an eye to the artworks’ perpetuation,\n a chronological approach is only partly effective. A further abstraction in\n categorization is needed, focusing on the network of site-specific functions\n and their changes over time. To this end, a selection of relevant notions\n elucidate the extended lives of site-specific installations, which I derive\n from case studies and observations made by artists and art historians in this respect. The discussion is a prelude to chapter 3, in which I take\n the vocabulary for site-specific installation artworks one step further by\n employing a triadic set of spatial functions, which I derive from Henri\n Lefebvre’s theory on space.","PeriodicalId":103627,"journal":{"name":"The Perpetuation of Site-Specific Installation Artworks in Museums","volume":"94 12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Perpetuation of Site-Specific Installation Artworks in Museums","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv25wxbgr.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The argument in this chapter starts with a discussion of the art historical
discourse on site-specific installation art. Artists as well as critics have
explored various notions of site specificity, usually in concordance with
successive art historical periods: the first “wave” of site-specific installations
created during the late 1960s and early 1970s, and a second period, from the
1980s and early 1990s until today. The chapter elucidates several art historical
perspectives on both periods and the shifts occurring in the relationship
between artists and museum institutions, between the artwork and the
site. Furthermore, it is important to realize that site-specific installation
artworks are highly diverse in form, content, and meaning. For the current
purpose of developing a model with an eye to the artworks’ perpetuation,
a chronological approach is only partly effective. A further abstraction in
categorization is needed, focusing on the network of site-specific functions
and their changes over time. To this end, a selection of relevant notions
elucidate the extended lives of site-specific installations, which I derive
from case studies and observations made by artists and art historians in this respect. The discussion is a prelude to chapter 3, in which I take
the vocabulary for site-specific installation artworks one step further by
employing a triadic set of spatial functions, which I derive from Henri
Lefebvre’s theory on space.