Site-Specific Installation Art in Historical Perspective

T. Scholte
{"title":"Site-Specific Installation Art in Historical Perspective","authors":"T. Scholte","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv25wxbgr.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The argument in this chapter starts with a discussion of the art historical\n discourse on site-specific installation art. Artists as well as critics have\n explored various notions of site specificity, usually in concordance with\n successive art historical periods: the first “wave” of site-specific installations\n created during the late 1960s and early 1970s, and a second period, from the\n 1980s and early 1990s until today. The chapter elucidates several art historical\n perspectives on both periods and the shifts occurring in the relationship\n between artists and museum institutions, between the artwork and the\n site. Furthermore, it is important to realize that site-specific installation\n artworks are highly diverse in form, content, and meaning. For the current\n purpose of developing a model with an eye to the artworks’ perpetuation,\n a chronological approach is only partly effective. A further abstraction in\n categorization is needed, focusing on the network of site-specific functions\n and their changes over time. To this end, a selection of relevant notions\n elucidate the extended lives of site-specific installations, which I derive\n from case studies and observations made by artists and art historians in this respect. The discussion is a prelude to chapter 3, in which I take\n the vocabulary for site-specific installation artworks one step further by\n employing a triadic set of spatial functions, which I derive from Henri\n Lefebvre’s theory on space.","PeriodicalId":103627,"journal":{"name":"The Perpetuation of Site-Specific Installation Artworks in Museums","volume":"94 12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Perpetuation of Site-Specific Installation Artworks in Museums","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv25wxbgr.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The argument in this chapter starts with a discussion of the art historical discourse on site-specific installation art. Artists as well as critics have explored various notions of site specificity, usually in concordance with successive art historical periods: the first “wave” of site-specific installations created during the late 1960s and early 1970s, and a second period, from the 1980s and early 1990s until today. The chapter elucidates several art historical perspectives on both periods and the shifts occurring in the relationship between artists and museum institutions, between the artwork and the site. Furthermore, it is important to realize that site-specific installation artworks are highly diverse in form, content, and meaning. For the current purpose of developing a model with an eye to the artworks’ perpetuation, a chronological approach is only partly effective. A further abstraction in categorization is needed, focusing on the network of site-specific functions and their changes over time. To this end, a selection of relevant notions elucidate the extended lives of site-specific installations, which I derive from case studies and observations made by artists and art historians in this respect. The discussion is a prelude to chapter 3, in which I take the vocabulary for site-specific installation artworks one step further by employing a triadic set of spatial functions, which I derive from Henri Lefebvre’s theory on space.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
历史视角下的特定场所装置艺术
本章的论述从对特定场所装置艺术的艺术史话语的讨论开始。艺术家和评论家已经探索了不同的场地特异性概念,通常与连续的艺术史时期相一致:第一波场地特异性装置创作于20世纪60年代末和70年代初,第二波创作于20世纪80年代和90年代初,直到今天。本章阐述了这两个时期的几个艺术史观点,以及艺术家和博物馆机构之间、艺术品和场地之间关系的转变。此外,重要的是要认识到,特定场地的装置艺术作品在形式、内容和意义上都是高度多样化的。目前的目的是建立一个着眼于艺术品永久化的模型,按时间顺序的方法只是部分有效。需要对分类进行进一步的抽象,重点关注特定地点的功能网络及其随时间的变化。为此,我从艺术家和艺术史学家在这方面的案例研究和观察中,选择了一些相关的概念来阐明特定场地装置的延长寿命。讨论是第3章的前奏,在第3章中,我通过使用来自亨利·列斐伏尔的空间理论的三元空间功能集,将特定场地的装置艺术品的词汇更进一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Jason Rhoades’s SLOTO Appendix List of Interviews Conducted by the Author Site-Specific Installation Art in Historical Perspective The Problem of the Perpetuation of Site-Specific Installation Art
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1