Thomas Boston

J. Fesko
{"title":"Thomas Boston","authors":"J. Fesko","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190071363.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the wake of the turbulent seventeenth century, eighteenth-century theologians began to turn away from the covenant of works. Theologians and philosophers became critical of perceived doctrinal strictness and sought to reduce theological commitments to bare minimums. One of the supposed enemies of the simplicity of faith was Reformed scholasticism. Thus, for some, the covenant of works became a casualty. There were others, such as Thomas Boston, who were positively disposed to the doctrine because they saw Reformed scholasticism as an asset. They also continued to employ Reformation-era exegetical methods. Advocates of the doctrine also saw the Westminster Confession as a good source.","PeriodicalId":399283,"journal":{"name":"The Covenant of Works","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Covenant of Works","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190071363.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the wake of the turbulent seventeenth century, eighteenth-century theologians began to turn away from the covenant of works. Theologians and philosophers became critical of perceived doctrinal strictness and sought to reduce theological commitments to bare minimums. One of the supposed enemies of the simplicity of faith was Reformed scholasticism. Thus, for some, the covenant of works became a casualty. There were others, such as Thomas Boston, who were positively disposed to the doctrine because they saw Reformed scholasticism as an asset. They also continued to employ Reformation-era exegetical methods. Advocates of the doctrine also saw the Westminster Confession as a good source.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
托马斯-波士顿
在动荡的17世纪之后,18世纪的神学家开始背离行为之约。神学家和哲学家开始批判教义的严格性,并试图将神学的承诺减少到最低限度。一个被认为是信仰纯洁性的敌人是改革宗经院哲学。因此,对一些人来说,工作之约成了牺牲品。还有一些人,比如托马斯·波士顿,积极地倾向于这种教义,因为他们认为改革宗经院哲学是一种财富。他们还继续使用宗教改革时期的训诂方法。该教义的拥护者也认为《威斯敏斯特信条》是一个很好的来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Reformation Conclusion The Westminster Standards Thomas Boston Jacob Arminius
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1