Vulnerability of Soil Carbon Regulating Ecosystem Services due to Land Cover Change in the State of New Hampshire, USA

Eearth Pub Date : 2021-05-19 DOI:10.3390/EARTH2020013
E. Mikhailova, Lili Lin, Zhenbang Hao, H. Zurqani, C. Post, M. Schlautman, Gregory C. Post
{"title":"Vulnerability of Soil Carbon Regulating Ecosystem Services due to Land Cover Change in the State of New Hampshire, USA","authors":"E. Mikhailova, Lili Lin, Zhenbang Hao, H. Zurqani, C. Post, M. Schlautman, Gregory C. Post","doi":"10.3390/EARTH2020013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Valuation of soil carbon (C) regulating ecosystem services (ES) at the state level is important for sustainable C management. The objective of this study was to assess the value of regulating ES from soil organic carbon (SOC), soil inorganic carbon (SIC), and total soil carbon (TSC) stocks, based on the concept of the avoided social cost of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions for the state of New Hampshire (NH) in the United States of America (USA) by soil order and county using information from the State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) database. The total estimated monetary mid-point value for TSC stocks in the state of New Hampshire was $73.0B (i.e., 73.0 billion U.S. dollars (USD), where B = billion = 109), $64.8B for SOC stocks, and $8.1B for SIC stocks. Soil orders with the highest midpoint value for SOC were Histosols ($33.2B), Spodosols ($20.2B), and Inceptisols ($10.1B). Soil orders with the highest midpoint value for SIC were Inceptisols ($5.8B), Spodosols ($1.0B), and Entisols ($770M, where M = million = 106). Soil orders with the highest midpoint value for TSC were Histosols ($33.8B), Spodosols ($21.2B), and Inceptisols ($15.9B). The counties with the highest midpoint SOC values were Rockingham ($15.4B), Hillsborough ($9.8B), and Coos ($9.2B). The counties with the highest midpoint SIC values were Merrimack ($1.2B), Coos ($1.1B), and Rockingham ($1.0B). The counties with the highest midpoint TSC values were Rockingham ($16.5B), Hillsborough ($10.8B), and Coos ($10.3B). New Hampshire has experienced land use/land cover (LULC) changes between 2001 and 2016. The changes in LULC across the state have not been uniform, but rather have varied by county, soil order, and pre-existing land cover. The counties that have exhibited the most development (e.g., Rockingham, Hillsborough, Merrimack) are those nearest the urban center of Boston, MA. Most soil orders have experienced losses in “low disturbance” land covers (e.g., evergreen forest, hay/pasture) and gains in “high disturbance” land covers (e.g., low-, medium-, and high-intensity developed land). In particular, Histosols are a high-risk carbon “hotspot” that contributes over 50% of the total estimated sequestration of SOC in New Hampshire while covering only 7% of the total land area. Integration of pedodiversity concepts with administrative units can be useful to design soil- and land-cover specific, cost-efficient policies to manage soil C regulating ES in New Hampshire at various administrative levels.","PeriodicalId":350455,"journal":{"name":"Eearth","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eearth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/EARTH2020013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Valuation of soil carbon (C) regulating ecosystem services (ES) at the state level is important for sustainable C management. The objective of this study was to assess the value of regulating ES from soil organic carbon (SOC), soil inorganic carbon (SIC), and total soil carbon (TSC) stocks, based on the concept of the avoided social cost of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions for the state of New Hampshire (NH) in the United States of America (USA) by soil order and county using information from the State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) database. The total estimated monetary mid-point value for TSC stocks in the state of New Hampshire was $73.0B (i.e., 73.0 billion U.S. dollars (USD), where B = billion = 109), $64.8B for SOC stocks, and $8.1B for SIC stocks. Soil orders with the highest midpoint value for SOC were Histosols ($33.2B), Spodosols ($20.2B), and Inceptisols ($10.1B). Soil orders with the highest midpoint value for SIC were Inceptisols ($5.8B), Spodosols ($1.0B), and Entisols ($770M, where M = million = 106). Soil orders with the highest midpoint value for TSC were Histosols ($33.8B), Spodosols ($21.2B), and Inceptisols ($15.9B). The counties with the highest midpoint SOC values were Rockingham ($15.4B), Hillsborough ($9.8B), and Coos ($9.2B). The counties with the highest midpoint SIC values were Merrimack ($1.2B), Coos ($1.1B), and Rockingham ($1.0B). The counties with the highest midpoint TSC values were Rockingham ($16.5B), Hillsborough ($10.8B), and Coos ($10.3B). New Hampshire has experienced land use/land cover (LULC) changes between 2001 and 2016. The changes in LULC across the state have not been uniform, but rather have varied by county, soil order, and pre-existing land cover. The counties that have exhibited the most development (e.g., Rockingham, Hillsborough, Merrimack) are those nearest the urban center of Boston, MA. Most soil orders have experienced losses in “low disturbance” land covers (e.g., evergreen forest, hay/pasture) and gains in “high disturbance” land covers (e.g., low-, medium-, and high-intensity developed land). In particular, Histosols are a high-risk carbon “hotspot” that contributes over 50% of the total estimated sequestration of SOC in New Hampshire while covering only 7% of the total land area. Integration of pedodiversity concepts with administrative units can be useful to design soil- and land-cover specific, cost-efficient policies to manage soil C regulating ES in New Hampshire at various administrative levels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国新罕布什尔州土地覆盖变化下土壤碳调节生态系统服务的脆弱性
国家层面土壤碳(C)评价对生态系统服务(ES)的调节作用对可持续碳管理具有重要意义。本研究的目的是利用STATSGO数据库的信息,基于美国新罕布什尔州(NH)土壤顺序和县避免的二氧化碳(CO2)排放社会成本的概念,评估从土壤有机碳(SOC)、土壤无机碳(SIC)和土壤总碳(TSC)储量中调节ES的价值。新罕布什尔州TSC股票的总货币中点价值估计为730亿美元(即730亿美元,其中B =十亿= 109),SOC股票为648亿美元,SIC股票为81亿美元。土壤有机碳中点值最高的土壤目是Histosols(332亿美元)、Spodosols(202亿美元)和Inceptisols(101亿美元)。SIC中点值最高的土壤目是Inceptisols(58亿美元)、Spodosols(10亿美元)和Entisols(7.7亿美元,其中M = million = 106)。TSC中点值最高的土壤目是Histosols(338亿美元)、Spodosols(21.2亿美元)和Inceptisols(159亿美元)。SOC值中点最高的县是罗金厄姆(154亿美元)、希尔斯伯勒(98亿美元)和库斯(92亿美元)。中点SIC值最高的县是梅里马克(12亿美元)、库斯(11亿美元)和罗金厄姆(10亿美元)。TSC值中点最高的县是罗金厄姆(165亿美元)、希尔斯伯勒(108亿美元)和库斯(103亿美元)。新罕布什尔州在2001年至2016年间经历了土地利用/土地覆盖(LULC)的变化。全州LULC的变化并不是统一的,而是因县、土壤秩序和原有土地覆盖而异。发展最快的县(如罗金厄姆、希尔斯伯勒、梅里马克)是那些离马萨诸塞州波士顿市中心最近的县。大多数土壤目都经历了“低干扰”土地覆盖(如常绿森林、干草/牧场)的损失,而“高干扰”土地覆盖(如低、中、高强度开发土地)的增加。特别是,Histosols是一个高风险的碳“热点”,它贡献了新罕布什尔州SOC总估计固存量的50%以上,而只覆盖了总土地面积的7%。将土壤多样性概念与行政单位相结合,有助于设计具体的土壤和土地覆盖、具有成本效益的政策来管理土壤C,从而在新罕布什尔州的各个行政级别上调节ES。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Soil Sensitivity to Wind and Water Erosion as Affected by Land Use in Southern Iran Lake Watershed Dynamics and Bathymetry Modeling of Rara and Begnas Lakes in Nepal Vulnerability of Soil Carbon Regulating Ecosystem Services due to Land Cover Change in the State of New Hampshire, USA Mapping the Alteration Zones for Uranium Exploration in Gabal Abu Garadi Area Central Eastern Desert, Egypt, Using Aster Data FischerLab: An Application for Generating Fischer Plots and Dynamic Fischer Plots from Wireline Well-Logs and Stratigraphic Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1