{"title":"An evaluation of cardiac uniformity, contrast and SNR with dual-head 180 degree and triple-head 360 degree SPECT scans","authors":"M. Chen, R. Jaszczak, J. Bowsher, D. Gilland","doi":"10.1109/NSSMIC.2000.949234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An experimental phantom study was performed to evaluate cardiac uniformity, contrast and SNR for two clinical cardiac SPECT imaging protocols: adjacent dual-head 180/spl deg/ and triple-head 360/spl deg/ scans. One head of a SPECT camera was used to acquire 180/spl deg/ and 360/spl deg/ projections with different times per step to simulate the clinical case where dual-head 180/spl deg/ and triple-head 360/spl deg/ each takes a total of 20 minutes. Scans were acquired with no lesion, anterior lesion and posterior lesion in the myocardium. Maximum a posteriori (MAP) reconstruction was done by Iterative Coordinate Descent (ICD) algorithm using a quadratic convex prior. The L-curve method was used to obtain the prior strength. Images both with attenuation and scatter correction (ASC) and without ASC were compared. The 180/spl deg/ scan shows an intensity decrease in anterior apical and posterior basal regions. The 360/spl deg/ scan shows an intensity decrease in the posterior wall. For the anterior lesion the 180/spl deg/ scan has slightly better contrast while for the posterior lesion the 360/spl deg/ scan has slightly better contrast. In conclusion, the difference between the 180/spl deg/ and 360/spl deg/ scans is subtle and the comparison results depend on the lesion position and the view angle of the heart. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study of 180/spl deg/ vs. 360/spl deg/ acquisition designed based on these characterizations of contrast, uniformity and noise will be necessary to evaluate overall performance.","PeriodicalId":445100,"journal":{"name":"2000 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (Cat. No.00CH37149)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2000 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (Cat. No.00CH37149)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2000.949234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
An experimental phantom study was performed to evaluate cardiac uniformity, contrast and SNR for two clinical cardiac SPECT imaging protocols: adjacent dual-head 180/spl deg/ and triple-head 360/spl deg/ scans. One head of a SPECT camera was used to acquire 180/spl deg/ and 360/spl deg/ projections with different times per step to simulate the clinical case where dual-head 180/spl deg/ and triple-head 360/spl deg/ each takes a total of 20 minutes. Scans were acquired with no lesion, anterior lesion and posterior lesion in the myocardium. Maximum a posteriori (MAP) reconstruction was done by Iterative Coordinate Descent (ICD) algorithm using a quadratic convex prior. The L-curve method was used to obtain the prior strength. Images both with attenuation and scatter correction (ASC) and without ASC were compared. The 180/spl deg/ scan shows an intensity decrease in anterior apical and posterior basal regions. The 360/spl deg/ scan shows an intensity decrease in the posterior wall. For the anterior lesion the 180/spl deg/ scan has slightly better contrast while for the posterior lesion the 360/spl deg/ scan has slightly better contrast. In conclusion, the difference between the 180/spl deg/ and 360/spl deg/ scans is subtle and the comparison results depend on the lesion position and the view angle of the heart. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study of 180/spl deg/ vs. 360/spl deg/ acquisition designed based on these characterizations of contrast, uniformity and noise will be necessary to evaluate overall performance.