Lack of Competition in the Financial Market in Israel: The Conflict between the Needs of P2P Lenders and the Platforms’ Intentions

Galit Klein, Ze'ev Shtudiner, M. Zwilling
{"title":"Lack of Competition in the Financial Market in Israel: The Conflict between the Needs of P2P Lenders and the Platforms’ Intentions","authors":"Galit Klein, Ze'ev Shtudiner, M. Zwilling","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3700107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peer-to-peer (P2P) lending began as a kind of sharing economy within the field of finance. Using internet platforms, P2P lending attempts to offer an alternative to traditional financial institutions like banks. However, the P2P sector plays only a minor role in the finance industry in Israel, compared to the traditional banking system that suffers from an oligopoly structure. We conducted two studies in order to investigate this gap, comparing the dual connection between lenders and the platforms. In the first study, we conducted a conjoint analysis to examine the attributes that have higher utility for the lenders, and impact their decision to invest through the P2P platforms. In the second study, we shift the research prism toward the platforms, and examine the factors they use to determine the lending interest rate for loans, other than the borrowers’ financial condition. We found that although lenders wish to decrease their risk and guarantee their investment, P2P companies encourage borrowers, thereby increasing the risk inherit in lending to strangers. This contradiction between the priorities of the lenders and the platforms, may explain why the general public considers P2P lending highly risk, and avoids this financial tool. Based on our results, we offer a number of suggestions to increase the attractiveness of the industry.","PeriodicalId":142352,"journal":{"name":"Columbia: Decision","volume":"37 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia: Decision","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3700107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peer-to-peer (P2P) lending began as a kind of sharing economy within the field of finance. Using internet platforms, P2P lending attempts to offer an alternative to traditional financial institutions like banks. However, the P2P sector plays only a minor role in the finance industry in Israel, compared to the traditional banking system that suffers from an oligopoly structure. We conducted two studies in order to investigate this gap, comparing the dual connection between lenders and the platforms. In the first study, we conducted a conjoint analysis to examine the attributes that have higher utility for the lenders, and impact their decision to invest through the P2P platforms. In the second study, we shift the research prism toward the platforms, and examine the factors they use to determine the lending interest rate for loans, other than the borrowers’ financial condition. We found that although lenders wish to decrease their risk and guarantee their investment, P2P companies encourage borrowers, thereby increasing the risk inherit in lending to strangers. This contradiction between the priorities of the lenders and the platforms, may explain why the general public considers P2P lending highly risk, and avoids this financial tool. Based on our results, we offer a number of suggestions to increase the attractiveness of the industry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以色列金融市场缺乏竞争:P2P贷款人的需求与平台意图之间的冲突
点对点(P2P)借贷最初是金融领域的一种共享经济。利用互联网平台,P2P借贷试图为银行等传统金融机构提供另一种选择。然而,与遭受寡头垄断结构的传统银行体系相比,P2P行业在以色列的金融业中只扮演着很小的角色。为了调查这一差距,我们进行了两项研究,比较了贷方和平台之间的双重联系。在第一项研究中,我们进行了一项联合分析,以检查贷款人具有更高效用的属性,并影响他们通过P2P平台投资的决策。在第二项研究中,我们将研究的棱镜转向了平台,并检查了他们用来决定贷款利率的因素,而不是借款人的财务状况。我们发现,尽管出借人希望降低风险并保证其投资,但P2P公司鼓励借款人,从而增加了向陌生人贷款的风险继承。这种贷款人和平台优先考虑的矛盾,可能解释了为什么公众认为P2P借贷高风险,并避免使用这种金融工具。基于我们的研究结果,我们提出了一些提高行业吸引力的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lack of Competition in the Financial Market in Israel: The Conflict between the Needs of P2P Lenders and the Platforms’ Intentions Evaluating Bank Performing Management on Banking Industry A Model for Queue Position Valuation in a Limit Order Book Purchase Order Financing: Credit, Commitment, and Supply Chain Consequences On the (Surprising) Sufficiency of Linear Models for Dynamic Pricing with Demand Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1