Comparison of CNN-based segmentation models for forest type classification

Kevin Kocon, Michel Krämer, Hendrik M. Würz
{"title":"Comparison of CNN-based segmentation models for forest type classification","authors":"Kevin Kocon, Michel Krämer, Hendrik M. Würz","doi":"10.5194/agile-giss-3-42-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. We present the results from evaluating various Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models to compare their usefulness for forest type classification. Machine Learning based on CNNs is known to be suitable to identify relevant patterns in remote sensing imagery. With the availability of free data sets (e.g. the Copernicus Sentinel-2 data), Machine Learning can be utilized for forest monitoring, which provides useful and timely information helping to measure and counteract the effects of climate change. To this end, we performed a case study with publicly available data from the federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia in Germany. We created an automated pipeline to preprocess and filter this data and trained the CNN models UNet, PSPNet, SegNet, and FCN-8. Since the data contained large rural areas, we augmented the imagery to improve classification results. We reapplied the trained models to the data, compared the results for each model, and evaluated the effect of augmentation. Our results show that UNet performs best with a categorical accuracy of 73% when trained with augmented imagery.\n","PeriodicalId":116168,"journal":{"name":"AGILE: GIScience Series","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AGILE: GIScience Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-3-42-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract. We present the results from evaluating various Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models to compare their usefulness for forest type classification. Machine Learning based on CNNs is known to be suitable to identify relevant patterns in remote sensing imagery. With the availability of free data sets (e.g. the Copernicus Sentinel-2 data), Machine Learning can be utilized for forest monitoring, which provides useful and timely information helping to measure and counteract the effects of climate change. To this end, we performed a case study with publicly available data from the federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia in Germany. We created an automated pipeline to preprocess and filter this data and trained the CNN models UNet, PSPNet, SegNet, and FCN-8. Since the data contained large rural areas, we augmented the imagery to improve classification results. We reapplied the trained models to the data, compared the results for each model, and evaluated the effect of augmentation. Our results show that UNet performs best with a categorical accuracy of 73% when trained with augmented imagery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于cnn的森林类型分类分割模型比较
摘要我们提出了评估各种卷积神经网络(CNN)模型的结果,以比较它们对森林类型分类的有用性。基于cnn的机器学习可以很好地识别遥感图像中的相关模式。随着免费数据集的可用性(例如哥白尼哨兵2号数据),机器学习可以用于森林监测,这提供了有用和及时的信息,有助于测量和抵消气候变化的影响。为此,我们使用来自德国北莱茵-威斯特伐利亚联邦州的公开数据进行了一个案例研究。我们创建了一个自动化管道来预处理和过滤这些数据,并训练了CNN模型UNet, PSPNet, SegNet和FCN-8。由于数据中包含较大的农村地区,我们对图像进行了增强,以提高分类结果。我们将训练好的模型重新应用于数据,比较每个模型的结果,并评估增强的效果。我们的结果表明,UNet在使用增强图像训练时表现最好,分类准确率为73%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is it safe to be attractive? Disentangling the influence of streetscape features on the perceived safety and attractiveness of city streets Satellite parking: a new method for measuring parking occupancy Semantic complexity of geographic questions - A comparison in terms of conceptual transformations of answers Development of an inclusive Mapping Application in a Co-Design Process Visualizing of the below-ground water network infrastructure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1