A Statistical Analysis of Performance in the 2021 CEC-GECCO-PESGM Competition on Evolutionary Computation in the Energy Domain

F. Lezama, J. Soares, B. Canizes, Z. Vale
{"title":"A Statistical Analysis of Performance in the 2021 CEC-GECCO-PESGM Competition on Evolutionary Computation in the Energy Domain","authors":"F. Lezama, J. Soares, B. Canizes, Z. Vale","doi":"10.1109/SSCI50451.2021.9660117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evolutionary algorithms (EAs) have emerged as an efficient alternative to deal with real-world applications with high complexity. However, due to the stochastic nature of the results obtained using EAs, the design of benchmarks and competitions where such approaches can be evaluated and compared is attracting attention in the field. In the energy domain, the “2021 CEC-GECCO-PESGM Competition on Evolutionary Computation in the Energy Domain: Smart Grid Applications” provides a platform to test and compare new EAs to solve complex problems in the field. However, the metric used to rank the algorithms is based solely on the mean fitness value (related to the objective function value only), which does not give statistical significance to the performance of the algorithms. Thus, this paper presents a statistical analysis using the Wilcoxon pair-wise comparison to study the performance of algorithms with statistical grounds. Results suggest that, for track 1 of the competition, only the winner approach (first place) is significantly different and superior to the other algorithms; in contrast, the second place is already statistically comparable to some other contestants. For track 2, all the winner approaches (first, second, and third) are statistically different from each other and the rest of the contestants. This type of analysis is important to have a deeper understanding of the stochastic performance of algorithms.","PeriodicalId":255763,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SSCI50451.2021.9660117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Evolutionary algorithms (EAs) have emerged as an efficient alternative to deal with real-world applications with high complexity. However, due to the stochastic nature of the results obtained using EAs, the design of benchmarks and competitions where such approaches can be evaluated and compared is attracting attention in the field. In the energy domain, the “2021 CEC-GECCO-PESGM Competition on Evolutionary Computation in the Energy Domain: Smart Grid Applications” provides a platform to test and compare new EAs to solve complex problems in the field. However, the metric used to rank the algorithms is based solely on the mean fitness value (related to the objective function value only), which does not give statistical significance to the performance of the algorithms. Thus, this paper presents a statistical analysis using the Wilcoxon pair-wise comparison to study the performance of algorithms with statistical grounds. Results suggest that, for track 1 of the competition, only the winner approach (first place) is significantly different and superior to the other algorithms; in contrast, the second place is already statistically comparable to some other contestants. For track 2, all the winner approaches (first, second, and third) are statistically different from each other and the rest of the contestants. This type of analysis is important to have a deeper understanding of the stochastic performance of algorithms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2021年cecc - gecco - pesgm能源领域进化计算竞赛中性能的统计分析
进化算法(EAs)已经成为处理高复杂性现实世界应用程序的有效替代方案。然而,由于使用ea获得的结果具有随机性,因此可以评估和比较这些方法的基准和竞赛的设计正在引起该领域的关注。在能源领域,“2021 cecc - gecco - pesgm能源领域进化计算竞赛:智能电网应用”为测试和比较新的ea提供了一个平台,以解决该领域的复杂问题。然而,用于对算法进行排名的度量仅基于平均适应度值(仅与目标函数值相关),这对算法的性能没有统计学意义。因此,本文提出了使用Wilcoxon配对比较的统计分析来研究具有统计基础的算法的性能。结果表明,对于比赛的赛道1,只有获胜者方法(第一名)与其他算法显著不同并优于其他算法;相比之下,第二名在统计上已经与其他一些选手不相上下。对于轨道2,所有获胜方法(第一、第二和第三)在统计上彼此不同,也不同于其他参赛者。这种类型的分析对于更深入地理解算法的随机性能非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Voice Dialog System for Simulated Patient Robot and Detection of Interviewer Nodding Deep Learning Approaches to Remaining Useful Life Prediction: A Survey Evaluation of Graph Convolutions for Spatio-Temporal Predictions of EV-Charge Availability Balanced K-means using Quantum annealing A Study of Transfer Learning in a Generation Constructive Hyper-Heuristic for One Dimensional Bin Packing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1