The World Of Desire: Lacan Between Evolutionary Biology and Psychoanalytic Theory

L. Chiesa
{"title":"The World Of Desire: Lacan Between Evolutionary Biology and Psychoanalytic Theory","authors":"L. Chiesa","doi":"10.1353/CGL.2011.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The primary aim of this paper is to analyse the biological foundations of Lacan's notion of desire as expounded in his first two Seminars (1953–1955). These works provide us with his most detailed discussion of the species-specific preconditions that allow homo sapiens to speak and establish symbolic pacts among individuals. Despite its irreducibility to the domain of animal instincts, human desire can only be adequately understood against the background of an evolutionary enquiry on the emergence of language, one that problematises both the implicit teleological assumptions of a certain Darwinianism and the logical consistency of an investigation of origins. Drawing on organic and anatomical evidence, Lacan postulates a primordial biological discord between man and his environment, centred on premature birth and a subsequent disorder of the imagination, from which language and the symbolic arise immanently. Desire is seen in this context as coextensive with what Lacan repeatedly refers to as \"the world of the symbol\". The key argument I intend to put forward is that the symbolic order is a world in the sense that, in always presenting itself to man as a totality, it compensates for the failure of a strictly \"natural\" relationship between man as animal and his environment. In performing this function, the symbolic also amounts to nothing else than \"human nature\" tout-court. In other words, the symbolic is an exceptional and to a certain extent autonomous pseudo-environmentthat must nevertheless be interpreted by means of biological concepts.","PeriodicalId":342699,"journal":{"name":"The Yearbook of Comparative Literature","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Yearbook of Comparative Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/CGL.2011.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The primary aim of this paper is to analyse the biological foundations of Lacan's notion of desire as expounded in his first two Seminars (1953–1955). These works provide us with his most detailed discussion of the species-specific preconditions that allow homo sapiens to speak and establish symbolic pacts among individuals. Despite its irreducibility to the domain of animal instincts, human desire can only be adequately understood against the background of an evolutionary enquiry on the emergence of language, one that problematises both the implicit teleological assumptions of a certain Darwinianism and the logical consistency of an investigation of origins. Drawing on organic and anatomical evidence, Lacan postulates a primordial biological discord between man and his environment, centred on premature birth and a subsequent disorder of the imagination, from which language and the symbolic arise immanently. Desire is seen in this context as coextensive with what Lacan repeatedly refers to as "the world of the symbol". The key argument I intend to put forward is that the symbolic order is a world in the sense that, in always presenting itself to man as a totality, it compensates for the failure of a strictly "natural" relationship between man as animal and his environment. In performing this function, the symbolic also amounts to nothing else than "human nature" tout-court. In other words, the symbolic is an exceptional and to a certain extent autonomous pseudo-environmentthat must nevertheless be interpreted by means of biological concepts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欲望的世界:拉康在进化生物学和精神分析理论之间
本文的主要目的是分析拉康欲望概念的生物学基础,正如他在前两次研讨会(1953-1955)中所阐述的那样。这些作品为我们提供了他对物种特有的先决条件的最详细的讨论,这些先决条件允许智人说话,并在个体之间建立象征性的契约。尽管人类的欲望不可简化为动物本能的范畴,但人类的欲望只有在对语言出现的进化研究的背景下才能得到充分的理解,这种研究既质疑了达尔文主义的隐含目的论假设,也质疑了起源调查的逻辑一致性。根据有机和解剖学的证据,拉康假设人类和他的环境之间存在着一种原始的生物学上的不和谐,以早产和随后的想象紊乱为中心,语言和象征从内在地产生。在这个语境中,欲望被看作是与拉康反复提到的“象征的世界”共同扩展的。我想提出的关键论点是,在某种意义上,符号秩序是一个世界,它总是把自己作为一个整体呈现给人,它弥补了作为动物的人与其环境之间严格“自然”关系的失败。在履行这一职能时,象征性也无异于“人性”。换句话说,符号是一种例外的,在一定程度上是自主的伪环境,但必须通过生物概念来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“A Stratagem for Self-Oblivion”: Rosselli, Real Talk, and the Abolition of the “I” Foreign Poems Damage and Repair in Environmental Assessment A Seafloor for the Disaster Receding Margins: Black Rice and the Rhythms of Tidal Transfer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1