ON TAX OBLIGATORY AND TAXPAYER AND ITS IMPLICATIONS

Leo B. Barus
{"title":"ON TAX OBLIGATORY AND TAXPAYER AND ITS IMPLICATIONS","authors":"Leo B. Barus","doi":"10.56282/jtlp.v1i1.59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The scarcity of normative studies related to the terminology of taxpayers and taxpayers, many developed countries use the terminology of taxpayers, and the more substance taxpayers refer to in the decisions of the Constitutional Court, it is necessary to conduct a study of the terminology of taxpayers and taxpayers in order to produce legal concepts that are ideal. al to one of these terminologies. A ius constituen-dum is needed in forming a positive law that shows the formulation of a concept in a definitive, firm, and transparent manner so that it is sufficient to use normative legal methods. The terminology of the taxpayer has not met the requirements in the form of \"the definition must be clearer than the definiendum,” \"must not mention the concept in its formulation,” and \"must be able to switch back and forth between the concept and its formulation.” It is hoped that there will be a reform of the Tax Formal Law that changes the terminology of the taxpayer to the terminology of the taxpayer because it has a tendency to be a development hero and deserves excellent service from the regional and central tax authorities. The current tax laws and regulations use the terminology of taxpayers, not taxpayers. However, based on the results of literature, philosophical, and juridical studies, it is concluded that the ideal terminology in the tax laws and regulations in Indonesia is the taxpayer.","PeriodicalId":406521,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Tax Law and Policy","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Tax Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56282/jtlp.v1i1.59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The scarcity of normative studies related to the terminology of taxpayers and taxpayers, many developed countries use the terminology of taxpayers, and the more substance taxpayers refer to in the decisions of the Constitutional Court, it is necessary to conduct a study of the terminology of taxpayers and taxpayers in order to produce legal concepts that are ideal. al to one of these terminologies. A ius constituen-dum is needed in forming a positive law that shows the formulation of a concept in a definitive, firm, and transparent manner so that it is sufficient to use normative legal methods. The terminology of the taxpayer has not met the requirements in the form of "the definition must be clearer than the definiendum,” "must not mention the concept in its formulation,” and "must be able to switch back and forth between the concept and its formulation.” It is hoped that there will be a reform of the Tax Formal Law that changes the terminology of the taxpayer to the terminology of the taxpayer because it has a tendency to be a development hero and deserves excellent service from the regional and central tax authorities. The current tax laws and regulations use the terminology of taxpayers, not taxpayers. However, based on the results of literature, philosophical, and juridical studies, it is concluded that the ideal terminology in the tax laws and regulations in Indonesia is the taxpayer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论纳税义务与纳税人及其启示
与纳税人和纳税人术语相关的规范研究缺乏,许多发达国家都使用纳税人术语,而宪法法院判决中纳税人所涉及的实质内容较多,因此有必要对纳税人和纳税人术语进行研究,以产生理想的法律概念。这是其中一个术语。在形成一部成文法时,需要有一个构成法,以明确、坚定和透明的方式表明一个概念的形成,以便充分使用规范的法律方法。纳税人的术语不符合“定义必须比定义更清晰”、“在表述中不得提及该概念”、“必须能够在概念和表述之间来回切换”的要求。希望《税收形式法》能够进行改革,将“纳税人”一词改为“纳税人”一词,因为“纳税人”有成为发展英雄的倾向,值得地方和中央税务机关的大力服务。现行税收法律法规使用的是纳税人术语,而不是纳税人术语。然而,根据文献,哲学和法律研究的结果,得出结论,印度尼西亚税收法律法规中理想的术语是纳税人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
RESTORATIVE JUSTICE ASPECT IN STRENGTHENING PRELIMINARY EVIDENCE AUDIT IN INDONESIAN TAXATION CAPABILITY DEPRIVATION MEETS THE DIGITAL DIVIDE: THE URGENCY OF ACCESSIBILITY AND CONNECTIVITY IN ALLEVIATING THE POVERTY OF TOBACCO FARMERS IN INDONESIA CERTAINTY AND SIMPLICITY PRINCIPLE IN BROADENING THE SCOPE OF TAX AUDIT IN INDONESIA IS ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE A PROBLEM-SOLVING OF TAX DISPUTE? ON TAX OBLIGATORY AND TAXPAYER AND ITS IMPLICATIONS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1