Using online to enhance student engagement of design reviews and lessons learned experiences

G. Harvel
{"title":"Using online to enhance student engagement of design reviews and lessons learned experiences","authors":"G. Harvel","doi":"10.24908/pceea.vi.15922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is about using the online environment to increase engagement in design and instilling a recognition of the importance of life long learning.  The work assesses changes in the delivery of a 4th year nuclear engineering design course and evaluates changes in the delivery of the course as it migrated from face to face to hybrid to online. In particular, the design review process was used to enhance engagement of the student body and a lessons learned exercise was used to enhance reflection on life long learning. The engagement is assessed in terms of class attendance, activity within the learning management system, and direct engagement in the design review process. The design review process requires each student to both present a design and to critique another group’s design. The design work is done as a team but the critique is done as an individual paralleling the industry process currently in use for the nuclear sector. In addition to the technical details, the performance of each student with respect to their soft skills is also assessed. This includes the number of students that actively engage or passively engage during both presentation and critique stages. Following the design review process, the students then engage in a lessons learned activity similar to what is done in the industry but simplified to focus on their experience. The activity also included an opportunity to reflect on themselves and establish a life long learning plan to address their personal findings. Note the paper will not discuss the personal findings specifically but instead will comment on the engagement of the students. Before using online approaches, the students fell into two distinct groups. One set was strongly active in the design review process and the other set was strongly resistive to participation and did the minimum necessary to get through the exercise. It was very clear that many students felt uncomfortable speaking openly in front of others. This changed significantly with the use of online technology. There was a significant increase in the number of students that engaged or at least felt comfortable to speak in the online setting. Some students displayed perhaps too much comfort in working from their personal environment space. This observation was also noted in the lessons learned exercise where the students went from saying the minimum necessary to having a large amount of insightful comments to make. The results suggest that allowing online participation in the experience has encouraged engagement of students that would resist a face to face experience.","PeriodicalId":314914,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.vi.15922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is about using the online environment to increase engagement in design and instilling a recognition of the importance of life long learning.  The work assesses changes in the delivery of a 4th year nuclear engineering design course and evaluates changes in the delivery of the course as it migrated from face to face to hybrid to online. In particular, the design review process was used to enhance engagement of the student body and a lessons learned exercise was used to enhance reflection on life long learning. The engagement is assessed in terms of class attendance, activity within the learning management system, and direct engagement in the design review process. The design review process requires each student to both present a design and to critique another group’s design. The design work is done as a team but the critique is done as an individual paralleling the industry process currently in use for the nuclear sector. In addition to the technical details, the performance of each student with respect to their soft skills is also assessed. This includes the number of students that actively engage or passively engage during both presentation and critique stages. Following the design review process, the students then engage in a lessons learned activity similar to what is done in the industry but simplified to focus on their experience. The activity also included an opportunity to reflect on themselves and establish a life long learning plan to address their personal findings. Note the paper will not discuss the personal findings specifically but instead will comment on the engagement of the students. Before using online approaches, the students fell into two distinct groups. One set was strongly active in the design review process and the other set was strongly resistive to participation and did the minimum necessary to get through the exercise. It was very clear that many students felt uncomfortable speaking openly in front of others. This changed significantly with the use of online technology. There was a significant increase in the number of students that engaged or at least felt comfortable to speak in the online setting. Some students displayed perhaps too much comfort in working from their personal environment space. This observation was also noted in the lessons learned exercise where the students went from saying the minimum necessary to having a large amount of insightful comments to make. The results suggest that allowing online participation in the experience has encouraged engagement of students that would resist a face to face experience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用网络提高学生对设计评论和经验教训的参与度
这篇论文是关于使用在线环境来增加设计的参与度,并灌输对终身学习重要性的认识。这项工作评估了第四年核工程设计课程交付的变化,并评估了课程从面授到混合再到在线交付的变化。特别地,设计审查过程被用来加强学生团体的参与,并使用经验教训练习来加强对终身学习的反思。参与度是根据课堂出勤率、学习管理系统内的活动以及直接参与设计审查过程来评估的。设计评审过程要求每个学生既要展示自己的设计,又要对另一组的设计进行评论。设计工作是作为一个团队完成的,但批评是作为一个个人完成的,与目前在核部门使用的工业过程平行。除了技术细节,每个学生在软技能方面的表现也会被评估。这包括在演示和评论阶段积极参与或被动参与的学生人数。在设计审查过程之后,学生们将参与一个类似于行业中所做的经验教训活动,但简化为专注于他们的经验。该活动还包括一个反思自己的机会,并建立一个终身学习计划,以解决他们的个人发现。请注意,本文不会具体讨论个人发现,而是会评论学生的参与情况。在使用在线教学方法之前,学生分为两组。其中一组在设计审查过程中非常活跃,而另一组则强烈抵制参与,只做了最少的工作。很明显,许多学生在别人面前公开讲话感到不舒服。随着在线技术的使用,这种情况发生了重大变化。参与或至少感到自在地在网上发言的学生人数显著增加。一些学生在自己的个人环境空间里工作,可能表现得过于舒适了。这一观察结果也被记录在了课程学习练习中,学生们从说最少的必要内容到有大量有见地的评论。结果表明,允许在线参与体验鼓励了那些拒绝面对面体验的学生的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What Makes an Exemplary Engineering Leader? In the Words of Engineers Questioning Green Growth and Sustainable Development in Undergraduate Engineering Memorization: Friend or Foe when Solving Problems in STEM Undergraduate Courses Persistent mistakes in learning basic circuit analysis Development and Assessment of a Training Module on Intellectual Property Literacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1