Three Step Interview as a Strategy on the Performance in Science of Grade 8 Students

Gabriela C. Galceran, Bella C. Mugot
{"title":"Three Step Interview as a Strategy on the Performance in Science of Grade 8 Students","authors":"Gabriela C. Galceran, Bella C. Mugot","doi":"10.30845/JESP.V6N1P12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of Three step interview as a strategy on the performance in science of grade 8 students. Specifically this study aims to find out the significant difference on the pretest scores in science of the students when grouped to Three step interview as a strategy and lecture method; it finds out the significant difference on the posttest scores in science of the students when taught using Three step interview as a strategy and lecture method and; it finds out the significant difference on the pretest and posttest scores in science of the students when taught using Three step interview as a strategy and lecture method. The study used the true experimental design. T-test, percentage and paired t-test were used to analyse the data. The results revealed that there was no significant difference on the prestest scores in science of the students when grouped to Three step interview as a strategy and lecture method since the t-value which is -1.32 corresponds to the p-value of 0.191 and is greater than p ≤ 0.05 level of significance. The analysis also revealed that there was a significant difference on the posttest scores in science when students were taught using Three step interview as a strategy and lecture method since the t-value which is 4.61 corresponds to the pvalue of 2.26X10 -5 is lesser than p ≤ 0.05 level of significance. The paired t-test results revealed that for the Three step interview group, there was a significant difference on the pretest and posttest scores in science of grade 8 students since the t-value which is -13.76 corresponds to the p-value of 3.02X10 -14 is lesser than p ≤ 0.05 level of significance. For the lecture method group, there was significant difference on the pretest and posttest scores in science of grade 8 students since the t-value which is -12.04 corresponds to the p-value of 8.33X10 -13 is lesser than p ≤ 0.05 level of significance. The use of the Three step interview as a strategy in teaching science can greatly improve students’ performance.","PeriodicalId":170810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education & Social Policy","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education & Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30845/JESP.V6N1P12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of Three step interview as a strategy on the performance in science of grade 8 students. Specifically this study aims to find out the significant difference on the pretest scores in science of the students when grouped to Three step interview as a strategy and lecture method; it finds out the significant difference on the posttest scores in science of the students when taught using Three step interview as a strategy and lecture method and; it finds out the significant difference on the pretest and posttest scores in science of the students when taught using Three step interview as a strategy and lecture method. The study used the true experimental design. T-test, percentage and paired t-test were used to analyse the data. The results revealed that there was no significant difference on the prestest scores in science of the students when grouped to Three step interview as a strategy and lecture method since the t-value which is -1.32 corresponds to the p-value of 0.191 and is greater than p ≤ 0.05 level of significance. The analysis also revealed that there was a significant difference on the posttest scores in science when students were taught using Three step interview as a strategy and lecture method since the t-value which is 4.61 corresponds to the pvalue of 2.26X10 -5 is lesser than p ≤ 0.05 level of significance. The paired t-test results revealed that for the Three step interview group, there was a significant difference on the pretest and posttest scores in science of grade 8 students since the t-value which is -13.76 corresponds to the p-value of 3.02X10 -14 is lesser than p ≤ 0.05 level of significance. For the lecture method group, there was significant difference on the pretest and posttest scores in science of grade 8 students since the t-value which is -12.04 corresponds to the p-value of 8.33X10 -13 is lesser than p ≤ 0.05 level of significance. The use of the Three step interview as a strategy in teaching science can greatly improve students’ performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三步访谈策略对八年级学生科学成绩的影响
本研究旨在确定三步访谈策略对八年级学生科学成绩的影响。具体而言,本研究旨在发现三步访谈策略与课堂教学法对学生科学前测成绩的显著差异;研究发现,采用三步访谈策略和授课方式教学对学生的理科后测成绩有显著差异;研究发现,采用三步访谈策略和授课方式进行教学,学生的科学前测和后测成绩存在显著差异。这项研究采用了真正的实验设计。采用t检验、百分比检验和配对t检验对数据进行分析。结果显示,以三步访谈为策略分组和以授课方式分组时,学生的理科成绩没有显著差异,t值为-1.32对应的p值为0.191,大于p≤0.05的显著性水平。分析还发现,采用三步访谈策略和授课方式教学学生的科学后测成绩存在显著差异,因为t值为4.61对应的p值为2.26X10 -5小于p≤0.05的显著性水平。配对t检验结果显示,三步访谈组八年级学生的科学前测和后测成绩存在显著差异,t值为-13.76对应的p值为3.02 × 10 -14小于p≤0.05的显著性水平。授课法组8年级学生的科学前测和后测成绩差异显著,t值为-12.04对应的p值为8.33X10 -13小于p≤0.05的显著性水平。在科学教学中运用三步访谈策略可以大大提高学生的学习成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From RAE to REF: Trust and Atmosphere in UK Higher Education Reform Religious Education of Lifelong Learning in Taiwan Weixin Shengjiao I Ching University The Manifestation of Alienation in Sylvia Plath’s the Bell Jar Female Technology Leaders Overcome Barriers to Climb the US Industry Ladder Debunking Hattie: Evaluating the Contribution of Academic Studies to Policy Development and Implementation in Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1