Integrating requirements engineering and user experience design in Product life cycle Management

P. Anitha, B. Prabhu
{"title":"Integrating requirements engineering and user experience design in Product life cycle Management","authors":"P. Anitha, B. Prabhu","doi":"10.1109/USARE.2012.6226784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Product development processes and best practices have come a long way in the last decade through continuous evolutions of new lifecycle and process models. Development models such as the waterfall model, spiral model, rational unified process, agile and many others have looked at efficiency of the development processes. These approaches have helped practitioners improve immensely on the efficiency and efficacy of the product development processes. However, product quality needs to be measured by parameters that go beyond the traditional criteria like performance, reliability, reusability etc. A product that has any interaction with the end user also needs to meet a fundamental requirement of being “user friendly”. Development models such as JAD (Joint Application Development) have focused on making products user friendly. Apart from achieving the technical soundness in a product, the success of the product also largely depends on how well the product addresses the primary requirements of the user such as desirability, relevance and usability. Not meeting these requirements leads to bad user experience, which, in turn can actually lead to failure of the product. This paper discusses some of the misconceptions and myths that exist in the industry regarding Requirements Engineering (RE) and User Experience Design (UXD), and how user needs typically slip through the cracks under the name of “non functional requirements”. The paper highlights the need for RE and UXD focus during the overall product development life cycle. In the concluding section an integrated framework for RE and UXD in the PLM process is presented.","PeriodicalId":332102,"journal":{"name":"2012 First International Workshop on Usability and Accessibility Focused Requirements Engineering (UsARE)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 First International Workshop on Usability and Accessibility Focused Requirements Engineering (UsARE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/USARE.2012.6226784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Product development processes and best practices have come a long way in the last decade through continuous evolutions of new lifecycle and process models. Development models such as the waterfall model, spiral model, rational unified process, agile and many others have looked at efficiency of the development processes. These approaches have helped practitioners improve immensely on the efficiency and efficacy of the product development processes. However, product quality needs to be measured by parameters that go beyond the traditional criteria like performance, reliability, reusability etc. A product that has any interaction with the end user also needs to meet a fundamental requirement of being “user friendly”. Development models such as JAD (Joint Application Development) have focused on making products user friendly. Apart from achieving the technical soundness in a product, the success of the product also largely depends on how well the product addresses the primary requirements of the user such as desirability, relevance and usability. Not meeting these requirements leads to bad user experience, which, in turn can actually lead to failure of the product. This paper discusses some of the misconceptions and myths that exist in the industry regarding Requirements Engineering (RE) and User Experience Design (UXD), and how user needs typically slip through the cracks under the name of “non functional requirements”. The paper highlights the need for RE and UXD focus during the overall product development life cycle. In the concluding section an integrated framework for RE and UXD in the PLM process is presented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在产品生命周期管理中整合需求工程和用户体验设计
在过去的十年中,产品开发过程和最佳实践通过新的生命周期和过程模型的不断发展已经走过了很长的路。开发模型,如瀑布模型、螺旋模型、理性统一过程、敏捷和许多其他模型都关注开发过程的效率。这些方法已经帮助实践者极大地提高了产品开发过程的效率和功效。然而,产品质量需要通过性能、可靠性、可重用性等传统标准之外的参数来衡量。与最终用户有任何交互的产品也需要满足“用户友好”的基本要求。像JAD(联合应用程序开发)这样的开发模型专注于使产品对用户友好。除了在产品中实现技术上的合理性之外,产品的成功在很大程度上还取决于产品如何满足用户的主要需求,如可取性、相关性和可用性。不满足这些需求会导致糟糕的用户体验,而这反过来又会导致产品的失败。本文讨论了行业中存在的一些关于需求工程(RE)和用户体验设计(UXD)的误解和神话,以及用户需求如何在“非功能需求”的名义下溜过裂缝。本文强调了在整个产品开发生命周期中关注可再生能源和用户体验开发的必要性。在结论部分,提出了PLM过程中RE和UXD的集成框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How personas support requirements engineering Requirements gathering for assistive technology that includes low vision and sighted users Towards a usability requirements taxonomy for mobile AAC services Integrating requirements engineering and user experience design in Product life cycle Management Interplay of usability and requirements engineering in facts analysis for patent disputes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1