Understanding the Performance of the Equity Value Factor

Lauren Stagnol, C. Lopez, T. Roncalli, Bruno Taillardat
{"title":"Understanding the Performance of the Equity Value Factor","authors":"Lauren Stagnol, C. Lopez, T. Roncalli, Bruno Taillardat","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3813572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After decades of sound performance, doubts have been raised on the ability of the equity value factor to continue to deliver a positive performance in the aftermath of the 2008 Global Financial Crisis. Indeed, in a context dominated by low yields, sluggish growth and subdued inflation combined with an accelerating digitalization of the economy, the performance of value strategies struggled over the past decade. In this paper, we investigate potential drivers behind this performance lag, such as macroeconomic and microeconomic determinants, ESG characteristics or credit-borrowed components. Based on European and American data, we find that inflation and tightening credit spread levels are the most supportive factors for value stocks. As far as interest rates are concerned, their sustained low levels prevented the value stock universe from clearing its most distressed issuers, also known as \"deep value\", and thus dampened value performance. As a matter of fact, we show that value has not been systematically an investment strategy bearing a heightened default risk. Our ESG analysis corroborates the \"transatlantic divide\", the historical gap between the U.S. and Europe on this front, and shows that value and growth stocks are not necessarily all brown and green stocks. In addition, we demonstrate that the small cap segment has not been the magical cure to value underperformance. Finally, we conclude that value is not dead yet, and might even have bright days ahead considering the current improvements in market sentiment, especially if inflation does materialize. Nevertheless, we also emphasize that the current value risk factor is probably different in nature from the one we observed during the golden age of value investing at the beginning of the 2000s. Indeed, trading facilities, ease of access to fundamental data for a large number of investors, ESG investing and the digitalization of the economy may have changed the rules of the game.","PeriodicalId":130158,"journal":{"name":"DecisionSciRN: Econometric Decision Models (Topic)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DecisionSciRN: Econometric Decision Models (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3813572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

After decades of sound performance, doubts have been raised on the ability of the equity value factor to continue to deliver a positive performance in the aftermath of the 2008 Global Financial Crisis. Indeed, in a context dominated by low yields, sluggish growth and subdued inflation combined with an accelerating digitalization of the economy, the performance of value strategies struggled over the past decade. In this paper, we investigate potential drivers behind this performance lag, such as macroeconomic and microeconomic determinants, ESG characteristics or credit-borrowed components. Based on European and American data, we find that inflation and tightening credit spread levels are the most supportive factors for value stocks. As far as interest rates are concerned, their sustained low levels prevented the value stock universe from clearing its most distressed issuers, also known as "deep value", and thus dampened value performance. As a matter of fact, we show that value has not been systematically an investment strategy bearing a heightened default risk. Our ESG analysis corroborates the "transatlantic divide", the historical gap between the U.S. and Europe on this front, and shows that value and growth stocks are not necessarily all brown and green stocks. In addition, we demonstrate that the small cap segment has not been the magical cure to value underperformance. Finally, we conclude that value is not dead yet, and might even have bright days ahead considering the current improvements in market sentiment, especially if inflation does materialize. Nevertheless, we also emphasize that the current value risk factor is probably different in nature from the one we observed during the golden age of value investing at the beginning of the 2000s. Indeed, trading facilities, ease of access to fundamental data for a large number of investors, ESG investing and the digitalization of the economy may have changed the rules of the game.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解股权价值因素的表现
在经历了几十年的良好表现之后,人们开始质疑股票价值因素在2008年全球金融危机之后继续带来积极表现的能力。事实上,在低收益、增长缓慢、通胀低迷以及经济数字化加速的背景下,价值策略的表现在过去十年中表现不佳。在本文中,我们研究了这种绩效滞后背后的潜在驱动因素,如宏观经济和微观经济决定因素、ESG特征或信用借贷成分。根据欧洲和美国的数据,我们发现通货膨胀和信贷息差水平收紧是价值股最有利的因素。就利率而言,其持续的低水平阻止了价值型股票领域清算其最困难的发行人,也被称为“深度价值”,从而抑制了价值型股票的表现。事实上,我们表明,价值并没有系统地成为一种承担更高违约风险的投资策略。我们的ESG分析证实了“跨大西洋鸿沟”,即美国和欧洲在这方面的历史差距,并表明价值股和成长型股票不一定都是棕色和绿色股票。此外,我们还证明,小盘股并不是价值表现不佳的灵丹妙药。最后,我们得出的结论是,价值还没有消亡,考虑到目前市场情绪的改善,特别是如果通胀确实成为现实,未来甚至可能会有光明的日子。然而,我们也强调,当前的价值风险因素可能与我们在21世纪初价值投资黄金时代所观察到的价值风险因素在性质上有所不同。事实上,交易设施、大量投资者获得基础数据的便利性、ESG投资和经济数字化可能已经改变了游戏规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Circular Economy, Stock Volatility and Resilience to the COVID-19 Shock: Evidence from European Companies Policy Regime Shifts In China Yield Curve Momentum Understanding the Performance of the Equity Value Factor The Empirics of Long-Term Mexican Government Bond Yields
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1