Alevis’ Perspective on the Kurdish Movement and the Establishment of Distance

H. Dogan
{"title":"Alevis’ Perspective on the Kurdish Movement and the Establishment of Distance","authors":"H. Dogan","doi":"10.33422/3rd.rssconf.2020.11.104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kurds and Alevis have been two major ethnic groups that have fought for equal citizenship rights since the foundation of the Turkish Republic. However, in the historical process, both the influence of the dominant state discourse, the conflicts created by the global powers and the codes that settle in the historical-cultural memories keep a tension line alive between these two groups. Comprehending this tension requires understanding all these processes and various reactions. For example, migratory movements caused by the war in Syria lead to the rise of nationalism in Turkey, and the Kurds and Alevis, therefore, found themselves on different fronts. Or Alevis can believe the government’s nationalist discourse when it is about connecting HDP with terrorism although they do not agree with AKP (leading party of the government) under any other circumstances. This study intends to go deep into this tension, which can only be understood by making contact with the world of mentality, through field research which is the method of anthropology. In order to end the polarization which is fed by the hatred of identities and to establish a real democracy can only be made possible by the egalitarian contact of the oppressed peoples. Especially in a time where the authoritarian regimes are rising all over the world. For this reason, the study focuses on deciphering the interaction of the Alevis with the nationalist discourse that causes this hatred and finding the possibilities of establishing peaceful ways of communication.","PeriodicalId":313330,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of ‏The 3rd International Conference on Research in Social Sciences","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of ‏The 3rd International Conference on Research in Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/3rd.rssconf.2020.11.104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Kurds and Alevis have been two major ethnic groups that have fought for equal citizenship rights since the foundation of the Turkish Republic. However, in the historical process, both the influence of the dominant state discourse, the conflicts created by the global powers and the codes that settle in the historical-cultural memories keep a tension line alive between these two groups. Comprehending this tension requires understanding all these processes and various reactions. For example, migratory movements caused by the war in Syria lead to the rise of nationalism in Turkey, and the Kurds and Alevis, therefore, found themselves on different fronts. Or Alevis can believe the government’s nationalist discourse when it is about connecting HDP with terrorism although they do not agree with AKP (leading party of the government) under any other circumstances. This study intends to go deep into this tension, which can only be understood by making contact with the world of mentality, through field research which is the method of anthropology. In order to end the polarization which is fed by the hatred of identities and to establish a real democracy can only be made possible by the egalitarian contact of the oppressed peoples. Especially in a time where the authoritarian regimes are rising all over the world. For this reason, the study focuses on deciphering the interaction of the Alevis with the nationalist discourse that causes this hatred and finding the possibilities of establishing peaceful ways of communication.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿列维斯对库尔德运动与距离确立的看法
自土耳其共和国成立以来,库尔德人和阿拉维人一直是争取平等公民权的两个主要民族。然而,在历史进程中,主导国家话语的影响、全球大国制造的冲突以及沉淀在历史文化记忆中的规范,都使这两个群体之间保持着一条紧张的线。理解这种张力需要理解所有这些过程和各种反应。例如,叙利亚战争引发的移民运动导致土耳其民族主义抬头,库尔德人和阿拉维人因此处于不同的战线上。或者,当政府将人民民主党与恐怖主义联系起来时,Alevis可以相信政府的民族主义言论,尽管他们在任何其他情况下都不同意AKP(政府的领导党)。本研究试图通过人类学方法的田野调查,深入到这种张力之中,这种张力只能通过与心理世界的接触来理解。为了结束因对身份的仇恨而产生的两极分化,并建立真正的民主,只有通过被压迫人民的平等接触才能实现。尤其是在独裁政权在世界各地崛起的时候。因此,本研究的重点是解读阿列维人与民族主义话语之间的互动,这些话语导致了这种仇恨,并寻找建立和平沟通方式的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emotional Exhaustion, Performance of Teaching Staff, and Moderation of Demographic Variables Alevis’ Perspective on the Kurdish Movement and the Establishment of Distance U.S. V. Brendt Christensen: Jurisdictional, Psychosocial and Cross-cultural Issues Leadership Needs in the Hungarian Social Cooperatives. Results of a Survey The Double Discrimination: A Lived Experience of Female Humanities Teachers in Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1